Literature DB >> 28774471

Quantitative evaluation of diffusion-kurtosis imaging for grading endometrial carcinoma: a comparative study with diffusion-weighted imaging.

T Chen1, Y Li1, S-S Lu1, Y-D Zhang1, X-N Wang1, C-Y Luo2, H-B Shi3.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis magnetic resonance imaging (DKI) and standard diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in discriminating tumour grades of endometrial carcinoma (EC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-three patients with EC were included in this study. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value from standard DWI, apparent diffusion for Gaussian distribution (Dapp), and apparent kurtosis coefficient (Kapp) from DKI were acquired using a 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system. The measurement was based on an entire-tumour analysis. Histogram parameters (Dapp, Kapp, and ADC) were compared between high-grade (grade 3) and low-grade (grade 1 and 2) tumours. The diagnostic performance of imaging parameters for discriminating high- from low-grade tumours was analysed using a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC).
RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the 10th percentile of Dapp, 90th percentile of Kapp and 10th percentile of ADC were higher than other parameters in distinguishing high-grade tumours from low-grade tumours (AUC=0.821, 0.891 and 0.801, respectively). The combination of 10th percentile of Dapp and 90th percentile of Kapp improved the AUC to 0.901, which was significantly higher than that of the 10th percentile of ADC (0.810, p=0.0314) in differentiating high- from low-grade EC.
CONCLUSION: Entire-tumour volume histogram analysis of DKI and standard DWI were feasible for discriminating histological tumour grades of EC. DKI was relatively better than DWI in distinguishing high-grade from low-grade tumour in EC.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28774471     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  5 in total

1.  Amide Proton Transfer Imaging vs Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging for Predicting Histological Grade of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Baolin Wu; Fei Jia; Xuekun Li; Meng Zhang; Dongming Han; Zhiyun Jia
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2020-10-09

Review 2.  Diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging in abdominal oncological setting: why and when.

Authors:  Vincenza Granata; Roberta Fusco; Andrea Belli; Ginevra Danti; Eleonora Bicci; Carmen Cutolo; Antonella Petrillo; Francesco Izzo
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.698

3.  Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with microvascular invasion and histologic grade.

Authors:  Likun Cao; Jie Chen; Ting Duan; Min Wang; Hanyu Jiang; Yi Wei; Chunchao Xia; Xiaoyue Zhou; Xu Yan; Bin Song
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-04

4.  Metabolic Volumetric Parameters in 11C-Choline PET/MR Are Superior PET Imaging Biomarkers for Primary High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Jing-Ren Tseng; Lan-Yan Yang; Yu-Chun Lin; Chung-Yi Liu; See-Tong Pang; Ji-Hong Hong; Tzu-Chen Yen; Li-Jen Wang
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Evaluation of Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted Imaging for Risk Factors in Stage I Endometrial Cancer: A Comparison With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging.

Authors:  Xingxing Jin; Ruifang Yan; Zhong Li; Gaiyun Zhang; Wenling Liu; Hongxia Wang; Meng Zhang; Jinxia Guo; Kaiyu Wang; Dongming Han
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 5.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.