| Literature DB >> 28774148 |
Francesco Porcaro1, Laura Carlini2, Andrea Ugolini3, Daniela Visaggio4, Paolo Visca5, Ilaria Fratoddi6, Iole Venditti7, Carlo Meneghini8, Laura Simonelli9, Carlo Marini10, Wojciech Olszewski11,12, Nitya Ramanan13, Igor Luisetto14, Chiara Battocchio15.
Abstract
The synthesis, characterization and assessment of the antibacterial properties of hydrophilic silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) were investigated with the aim to probe their suitability for innovative applications in the field of nanobiotechnology. First, silver nanoparticles were synthetized and functionalized with two capping agents, namely 3-mercapto-1-propansulfonate (3MPS) and 1-β-thio-d-glucose (TG). The investigation of the structural and electronic properties of the nano-systems was carried out by means of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) and X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS). XPS data provided information about the system stability and the interactions between the metallic surface and the organic ligands. In addition, XPS data allowed us to achieve a deep understanding of the influence of the thiols stoichiometric ratio on the electronic properties and stability of AgNPs. In order to shed light on the structural and electronic local properties at Ag atoms sites, XAS at Ag K-Edge was successfully applied; furthermore, the combination of Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) and XAS results allowed determining AgNPs sizes, ranging between 3 and 13 nm. Finally, preliminary studies on the antibacterial properties of AgNPs showed promising results on four of six multidrug-resistant bacteria belonging to the ESKAPE group (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter sp.).Entities:
Keywords: antibacterial activity; hydrophilic ligands; silver nanoparticles
Year: 2016 PMID: 28774148 PMCID: PMC5456982 DOI: 10.3390/ma9121028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1(a) Targeting of bacterial cells by means of nanoparticles surface functionalization. Glucose functionalization can induce a selective interaction between nanoparticles and Glucose receptors expressed by bacterial cells promoting the uptake; (b) General reaction scheme of AgNPs-3MPS-TGs nanoparticles synthesis. The reaction involves the Ag reduction by means of NaBH4. Briefly, to a 3MPS and TG solution, Ag solution is added (1). Subsequently, the NaBH4 is added (2) in order to induce the metal reduction leading to the nanostructure formation.
Details of AgNPs.
| Sample Name | Molar Ratio | DLS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag | 3MPS | TG | Size (nm); Z Potential (mV) | |
| AgNPs-3MPS | 1 | 4 | / | 10 ± 2; −33 ± 2 |
| AgNPs-3MPS-TG1 | 1 | 4 | 0.1 | 3 ± 1; −40 ± 5 |
| AgNPs-3MPS-TG2 | 1 | 4 | 0.5 | 6 ± 2; −38 ± 4 |
Figure 2(a) Normalized Spectra of NPs and Foil samples and Ag+ determination. Inset: Zoom on XANES region shows the raising of white line intensity (arrow) and decreasing of fine structure oscillations in NPs with respect to the bulk reference; (b) Results of Ag+ sample quantification by means of subtraction method. The methodology is further described in Materials and Methods Section.
Figure 3k2 weighted Ag K-edge EXAFS spectra of the Ag-reference metal foil (top curve) and the data measured on AgNPs (vertically shifted for clarity).
Ag K-edge R-space refinement results for AgNPs-3MPS, AgNPs-3MPS-TG1, AgNPs-3MPS-TG2 NPs.
| Sample | Shell | Bond | CN | R (Å) | σ2 (Å2) | ∆E0 (eV) | R-Factor | Diameter (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag-Foil | I | Ag–Ag | 12 * | 2.86 (1) | 0.0092 (4) | 3.1 (1) | 0.009 | ∞ |
| AgNPs-3MPS | I | Ag–Ag | 11.2 (4) | 2.85 (1) | 0.010 (1) | 2.8 (1) | 0.010 | 13 (1) |
| AgNPs-3MPS-TG1 | I | Ag–Ag | 11.1 (3) | 2.85 (1) | 0.010 (1) | 2.8 (1) | 0.013 | 11 (1) |
| AgNPs-3MPS-TG2 | I | Ag–Ag | 10.8 (4) | 2.85 (1) | 0.010 (1) | 3.0 (1) | 0.013 | 9 (1) |
* Indicates parameters kept fixed during the refinements.
Figure 4Graphical results of EXAFS analysis: (a) Example of EXAFS best fit analysis on Ag-3MPS-TG2 sample: Ag K-edge k2 weighted Fourier transform modulus (top curves) and imaginary part (bottom curves): experimental (points) and best fit (red full lines) shifted for clarity. The fit takes into account only Ag–Ag single scattering signal path present in first shell; (b) Fourier filtered experimental (points) and best fit (ful lines) for reference Ag foil and NPs, vertically shifted for clarity.
S2p3/2 binding energy values and relative atomic ratios of AgNPs-3MPS and AgNPs-3MPS-TG1 samples.
| AgNPs-3MPS | 161.33 | 0.8 |
| AgNPs-3MPS-TG1 | 161.53 | 0.7 |
| AgNPs-3MPS | 169.06 | 1 |
| AgNPs-3MPS-TG1 | 168.31 | 1 |
O1s binding energy, relative atomic ratio and atomic percent for AgNPs-3MPS and AgNPs-3MPS TG-samples.
| AgNPs-3MPS | 532.25 | 0.46 | 30.17 |
| AgNPs-3MPS-TG1 | 532.03 | 0.56 | 31.37 |
| AgNPs-3MPS-TG2 | 532.29 | 1.09 | 43.89 |
| AgNPs-3MPS | 533.6 | 0.07 | 4.71 |
| AgNPs-3MPS-TG1 | 533.5 | 0.23 | 12.85 |
| AgNPs-3MPS-TG2 | 533.73 | 0.39 | 15.84 |
Figure 5XPS measurements on AgNPs S2p and Ag3d signals: (a) S2p and (b) Ag3d spectra for AgNPs-3MPS sample; and (c) S2p and (d) Ag3d spectra for AgNPs-3MPS-TG1 sample.
Figure 6XPS measurements on AgNPs 1Os signals: (a) Comparison between O1s spectra for AgNPs-3MPS, AgNPs-3MPS-TG1 and AgNPs-3MPS-TG2 samples. The peak at lower BE (~530 eV) refers to the TiO2 signal of the sample support, and it has been chosen as reference component to normalize spectra intensities; (b) Detail of the 532.6–534 eV BE region, evidencing the C-OH component intensity trend.
Inhibitory concentrations (IC50 and IC90; μg/mL) of AgNPs-3MPS, AgNPs-3MPS-TG1 and AgNPs-3MPS-TG2 against reference bacterial strains. Experiments were performed in triplicate and mean IC vales are reported ± the standard deviation.
| Strain | IC50 | IC90 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgNPs-3MPS | AgNPs-3MPS-TG1 | AgNPs-3MPS-TG2 | AgNPs-3MPS | AgNPs-3MPS-TG1 | AgNPs-3MPS-TG2 | |
| 55 ± 2.2 | 27 ± 1.5 | 33 ± 2.3 | 122 ± 2.9 | 56 ± 3.2 | 119 ± 2.4 | |
| >128 | 59 ± 2.4 | 62 ± 3.3 | >128 | >128 | >128 | |
| >128 | 122 ± 2.6 | >128 | >128 | >128 | >128 | |
| >128 | >128 | >128 | >128 | >128 | >128 | |
| 98 ± 3.6 | 25 ± 3.2 | 88 ±2.6 | 119 ± 3.1 | 31 ± 2.5 | 120 ± 2.7 | |
| 126 ± 1.2 | 39 ± 2.4 | 28 ± 2.2 | >128 | 59 ± 2.3 | >128 | |