| Literature DB >> 28774143 |
Sanchari Biswas1, Adya Karthikeyan2, Anne-Marie Kietzig3.
Abstract
We report on the effect of repetition rate on the formation and surface texture of the laser induced homogenous microstructures. Different microstructures were micromachined on copper (Cu) and titanium (Ti) using femtosecond pulses at 1 and 10 kHz. We studied the effect of the repetition rate on structure formation by comparing the threshold accumulated pulse ( F Σ p u l s e ) values and the effect on the surface texture through lacunarity analysis. Machining both metals at low F Σ p u l s e resulted in microstructures with higher lacunarity at 10 kHz compared to 1 kHz. On increasing F Σ p u l s e , the microstructures showed higher lacunarity at 1 kHz. The effect of the repetition rate on the threshold F Σ p u l s e values were, however, considerably different on the two metals. With an increase in repetition rate, we observed a decrease in the threshold F Σ p u l s e on Cu, while on Ti we observed an increase. These differences were successfully allied to the respective material characteristics and the resulting melt dynamics. While machining Ti at 10 kHz, the melt layer induced by one laser pulse persists until the next pulse arrives, acting as a dielectric for the subsequent pulse, thereby increasing F Σ p u l s e . However, on Cu, the melt layer quickly resolidifies and no such dielectric like phase is observed. Our study contributes to the current knowledge on the effect of the repetition rate as an irradiation parameter.Entities:
Keywords: accumulated fluence; copper; femtosecond laser; lacunarity analysis; microstructures; repetition rate; surface micromachining; titanium
Year: 2016 PMID: 28774143 PMCID: PMC5456961 DOI: 10.3390/ma9121023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Experimental conditions of various microstructures on metals.
| Microstructures in Metals | Micromachining Parameters (Wavelength, Repetition Rate, Pulse Duration, Fluence) | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Periodic nanostructures (LIPSS) | ||
| Ni | 800 nm, 1 kHz, 500 fs, 2.04 J/ | Zuhlke et al. 2013 [ |
| Al | 800 nm, 100 Hz, 65 fs, 0.05 J/ | Vorobyev and Guo 2008 [ |
| Au | 800 nm, 1 kHz, 65 fs, 0.16 J/ | Vorobyev et al. 2007 [ |
| Undulated groove microstructures | ||
| Ti | 800 nm, 1 kHz, 100 fs, 0.75 J/ | Tsukamoto et al. 2006 [ |
| Ni | not reported, 1 kHz, 50 fs, 1.392 J/ | Zuhlke et al. 2013 [ |
| Columnar microstructures | ||
| Ti | 800 nm, 1 kHz, 130 fs, 0.75 J/ | Nayak and Gupta 2010 [ |
| Ni | not reported, 1 kHz, 50 fs, 1.392–3.08 J/ | Zuhlke et al. 2013 [ |
| Al | 800 nm, 1 kHz, 130 fs, <0.16 J/ | Nayak and Gupta 2010 [ |
| Bumpy microstructures | ||
| Al | 800 nm, 10 kHz, <100 fs, 0.4–1 J/ | Ahmmed et al. 2015 [ |
| Ti | 800 nm, 10 kHz, <100 fs, 1.5–3 J/ | Ahmmed et al. 2015 [ |
| Conical microstructures | ||
| Ti | 800 nm, 1 kHz, 130 fs, 0.5–1.2 J/ | Nayak and Gupta 2010 [ |
| Ni | 800 nm, 1 kHz, 50 fs, 0.12 J/ | Zuhlke et al. 2013 [ |
Figure 1Representative images of the microstructures on Cu machined at 1 kHz (a) Nanoforest; (b) Deep and well defined trenches; (c) Narrow trenches; (d) Rough and rugged chaotic structures; (e) Tree bark; (f) Stalagmite structures; (g) Fish scales and (h) Aggregate structures showing the partial breaking (solid circle) of the top layer and the underlying structure (dashed circle). All scale bars represent 50 µm.
Microstructures fabricated at the two repetition rates.
| Microstructures | Labels as in | 1 kHz | 10 kHz | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nanoforest | √ | √ | Common microstructures | |
| Trench: narrow | √ | √ | ||
| Trench | √ | √ | ||
| Tree bark | √ | × | – | |
| Stalagmite | √ | × | – | |
| Fish scale | √ | × | – | |
| Aggregate | √ | × | – | |
| Undulating grooves | √ | √ | Common microstructures | |
| Bumps | √ | √ | ||
| Holes | √ | √ | ||
| Chaotic | √ | √ | ||
| Trench | – | × | √ | – |
| Stalagmite | √ | × | – | |
| Aggregate | √ | × | – | |
Figure 2Representative images of the microstructures on Ti machined at 1 kHz. (a) Undulating grooves; (b) Bumpy structures; (c) Holes; (d) Chaotic structures; (e) Stalagmites and (f) Aggregate structures. All scale bars represent 50 µm.
Figure 3vs. plots on Cu at (a) 1 kHz and (b) 10 kHz [23]. (Reprinted from Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 66, K.M. Tanvir Ahmmed, Edwin Jee Yang Ling, Phillip Servio, Anne-Marie Kietzig, Introducing a new optimization tool for femtosecond laser-induced surface texturing on titanium, stainless steel, aluminum and copper, 258-268, 2014, with permission from Elsevier.)
The threshold values of the common microstructures at 1 and 10 kHz [23] (in J/cm2).
| Common Microstructures | Labels as in | 1 kHz | 10 kHz |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nanoforest | 120 | 88 | |
| Trench:narrow | 400 | 282 | |
| Trench | 2101 | 353 | |
| Undulating grooves | 80 | 90 | |
| Bumps | 112 | 165 | |
| Holes | 233 | 275 | |
| Chaotic | 400 | 565 | |
Figure 4vs. plots on Ti at (a) 1 kHz and (b) 10 kHz [23].
Figure 5Lacunarity plots for the common microstructures on Cu at (a) 1 kHz and (b) 10 kHz.
Figure 6Lacunarity plots for the common microstructures on Ti at (a) 1 kHz and (b) 10 kHz.