| Literature DB >> 28774042 |
Juan C Pérez-Medina1, Miguel A Waldo-Mendoza2, Víctor J Cruz-Delgado3, Zoe V Quiñones-Jurado4, Pablo González-Morones5, Ronald F Ziolo6, Juan G Martínez-Colunga7, Florentino Soriano-Corral8, Carlos A Avila-Orta9.
Abstract
Metamaterial behavior of polymer nanocomposites (NCs) based on isotactic polypropylene (iPP) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) was investigated based on the observation of a negative dielectric constant (ε'). It is demonstrated that as the dielectric constant switches from negative to positive, the plasma frequency (ωp) depends strongly on the ultrasound-assisted fabrication method, as well as on the melt flow index of the iPP. NCs were fabricated using ultrasound-assisted extrusion methods with 10 wt % loadings of MWCNTs in iPPs with different melt flow indices (MFI). AC electrical conductivity (σ(AC)) as a function of frequency was determined to complement the electrical classification of the NCs, which were previously designated as insulating (I), static-dissipative (SD), and conductive (C) materials. It was found that the SD and C materials can also be classified as metamaterials (M). This type of behavior emerges from the negative dielectric constant observed at low frequencies although, at certain frequencies, the dielectric constant becomes positive. Our method of fabrication allows for the preparation of metamaterials with tunable ωp. iPP pure samples show only positive dielectric constants. Electrical conductivity increases in all cases with the addition of MWCNTs with the largest increases observed for samples with the highest MFI. A relationship between MFI and the fabrication method, with respect to electrical properties, is reported.Entities:
Keywords: AC electrical properties; carbon nanotubes; extrusion; melt flow index; metamaterials; negative dielectric constant; polypropylene; ultrasound
Year: 2016 PMID: 28774042 PMCID: PMC5457228 DOI: 10.3390/ma9110923
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Electrical properties of iPP with different MFIs (2.5, 34, and 1200 g/10 min). (a) ε′ and (b) σ(AC).
Figure 2ε′ for (a) iPPMFI=2.5/MWCNT; (b) iPPMFI=34/MWCNT; and (c) iPPMFI=1200/MWCNT fabricated using different ultrasound-assisted extrusion methods.
Reading from top to bottom: type of electrical material 1, crossover frequency from negative to positive (ωp), negative ε′ maximum value, and metamaterial classification for iPP/MWCNT nanocomposites fabricated by different ultrasound-assisted methods.
| Sample | Fabrication Method | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W-U | F-U | V-U | PT | |
| iPPMFI=2.5/MWCNT | Insulator | Insulator | Insulator | Insulator |
| N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| iPPMFI=34/MWCNT | Insulator | Static-dissipative | Static-dissipative | Conductor |
| N/A | 0.006 Hz | 0.1 Hz | 400 Hz | |
| N/A | −102 | −103 | −107 | |
| N/A | Metamaterial | Metamaterial | Metamaterial | |
| iPPMFI=1200/MWCNT | Conductor | Static-dissipative | Static-dissipative | Conductor |
| 20 Hz | 0.9 Hz | 0.1 Hz | 300 Hz | |
| −106 | −105 | −103 | −107 | |
| Metamaterial | Metamaterial | Metamaterial | Metamaterial | |
1 Data from Avila-Orta et al. [22].
Figure 3σ(AC) for (a) iPPMFI=2.5/MWCNT; (b) iPPMFI=34/MWCNT; and (c) iPPMFI=1200/MWCNT fabricated using different ultrasound-assisted extrusion methods.
Figure 4Electrical properties of iPPMFI=1200/MWCNT obtained by the PT fabrication method, (a) ε′ and (b) σ(AC).
Figure 5Low-magnification SEM micrographs for iPPMFI=34/MWCNT fabricated using different ultrasound-assisted extrusion methods (a) W-U; (b) F-U’; (c) V-U; and (d) PT.
Figure 6SEM micrographs within agglomerates for iPPMFI=34/MWCNT fabricated using different ultrasound-assisted extrusion methods (a) W-U; (b) F-U; (c) V-U; and (d) PT.
Figure 7SEM micrographs taken between agglomerates for iPPMFI = 34/MWCNT fabricated using different ultrasound-assisted extrusion methods (a) W-U; (b) F-U; (c) V-U; and (d) PT.