| Literature DB >> 28774002 |
Shuanglong Lin1, Miao Wang2, Li Liu3, Yinghua Liang4, Wenquan Cui5, Zisheng Zhang6,7, Nan Yun8,9.
Abstract
A facile and feaclass="Chemical">sibleEntities:
Keywords: X-ray diffraction; catalytic properties; chemical synthesis; optical properties; semiconductors
Year: 2016 PMID: 28774002 PMCID: PMC5457266 DOI: 10.3390/ma9110882
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1XRD patterns of the as-synthesized pure Bi2O2CO3, Ag@AgBr and Ag@AgBr/Bi2O2CO3 photocatalysts: 3 wt %, 7 wt %, and 11 wt % Ag@AgBr/Bi2O2CO3 composites.
Figure 2SEM images of: (a) Bi2O2CO3; (b) Ag@AgBr; and (c) Ag@AgBr(7 wt %)/Bi2O2CO3. The inset of (c): Ag@AgBr(11 wt %)/Bi2O2CO3. TEM image of: (d,e) Ag@AgBr(7 wt %)/Bi2O2CO3. HRTEM image of (f) Ag@AgBr(7 wt %)/Bi2O2CO3. SAED image of the (g) Ag@AgBr(7 wt %)/Bi2O2CO3. EDX image of (h) Ag@AgBr(7 wt %)/Bi2O2CO3.
Specific surface areas and average pore size of the prepared samples.
| Photocatalyst | Bi2O2CO3 | Ag@AgBr | Ag@AgBr | Ag@AgBr | Ag@AgBr | Ag@AgBr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surface area/m2·g−1 | 12.59 | 15.15 | 18.1 | 22.33 | 25.16 | 28.91 |
| Average pore size/nm | 21.15 | 21.43 | 21.64 | 22.02 | 21.75 | 21.25 |
Figure 3SEM image (a) and the corresponding elemental mapping images (b–f) of Ag@AgBr(7 wt %)/Bi2O2CO3.
Figure 4(a) UV-vis absorption spectra of the samples; and (b) (αhν)1/2 vs. photon energy (hν) curves of Bi2O2CO3 and Ag@AgBr(7 wt %)/Bi2O2CO3.
Figure 5(a) XPS survey spectrum of Ag@AgBr(7 wt %)/Bi2O2CO3. High resolution XPS spectra of: (b) Ag 3d spectra; (c) Bi 4f spectra; (d) C 1s spectra; and (e) O 1s spectra.
Figure 6Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of pure Bi2O2CO3 and Ag@AgBr(7 wt %)/Bi2O2CO3 sample (excitation at 280 nm at room temperature).
Figure 7Photocatalytic adsorption (a); and degradation (b) curves of MB over the various samples. (c) Absorption spectra for MB solution in the presence of Ag@AgBr(7 wt %)/Bi2O2CO3 under visible light irradiation over time; (d) TOC removal of MB over various photocatalysts under visible light irradiation.
Figure 8The kinetic rate constants of Ag@AgBr and Ag@AgBr/Bi2O2CO3 composite with different Ag@AgBr content for the photocatalytic degradation of MB under visible light irradiation.
Figure 9Effects of different scavengers on degradation of MB in the presence of Ag@AgBr(7 wt %)/Bi2O2CO3 photocatalyst under visible-light irradiation.
Figure 10Cycling runs for the photocatalytic degradation of MB in the presence of Ag@AgBr(7 wt %)/Bi2O2CO3 under visible light irradiation.
Figure 11Current density-time curves of electrodes made from pure Bi2O2CO3, and photocatalysts of various Ag@AgBr contents.
Figure 12Nyquist plots of Bi2O2CO3, Ag@AgBr(3 wt %)/Bi2O2CO3, Ag@AgBr(7 wt %)/Bi2O2CO3 and Ag@AgBr(11 wt %)/Bi2O2CO3 photoelectrodes in 0.1 M Na2SO4 solution (pH = 6.7).
Figure 13(a) The kinetic plots of photocatalytic degradation of BPA under visible light irradiation; (b) UV-vis spectra obtained at different reaction times in visible light-induced BPA photocatalytic degradation on Ag@AgBr(7 wt %)/Bi2O2CO3; (c) TOC removal of BPA over various photocatalysts under visible light irradiation
Figure 14Schematic diagram of the separation of electron–hole pairs over Ag@AgBr/Bi2O2CO3 under visible light irradiation.