| Literature DB >> 28773970 |
Jingguang Peng1,2, Yan Zhao3, Di Chen4, Kiade Li5, Wei Lu6, Biao Yan7.
Abstract
Powder metallurgy (PM) components are widely used in the auto industry due to the advantage of net-shape forming, low cost, and high efficiency. Still, usage of PM components is limited in the auto industry when encountering rigorous situations, like heavy load, due to lower strength, hardness, wear resistance, and other properties compared to wrought components due to the existence of massive pores in the PM components. In this study, through combining the powder metallurgy process and rolling process, the pores in the PM components were decreased and a homogenous densified layer was formed on the surface, which resulted in the enhancement of the strength, hardness, wear resistance, and other properties, which can expand its range of application. In this paper, we study the impact of different rolling feeds on the performance of the components' surfaces. We found that with the increase of the rolling feed, the depth of the densified layer increased.Entities:
Keywords: powder metallurgy; rolling; surface densification; wear resistance
Year: 2016 PMID: 28773970 PMCID: PMC5456641 DOI: 10.3390/ma9100846
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Chemical composition of the PM material.
|
| Cr | C | Cu | Astaloy 85Mo |
|
| 0.85 | 0.80 | 1.50 | Bal. |
Figure 1Schematic view of the experimental apparatus.
Figure 2Metallographs of the tooth of the sprocket with different rolling feeds. (a) △d = 0 mm; (b) △d = 0.2 mm; (c) △d = 0.4 mm; (d) △d = 0.6 mm; and (e) △d = 0.8 mm.
Depth of the densified layer with different rolling feeds.
|
| 0 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
|
| 0 | 0.16 | 0.33 | 0.56 | 0.61 |
Figure 3Enlarged view of the metallograph of the tooth of the sprocket after the rolling.
Figure 4Comparison of porosity distributions with different rolling feeds.
Figure 5SEM images of interior zones and edge zones of the pre-rolled and post-rolled part.
Figure 6Micro-hardness distributions of gears with different rolling feeds.
Figure 7Comparison of tooth flank roughness.
Figure 8Penetration depth of pre-rolled and post-rolled gears.
Figure 9Friction coefficient curve of pre-rolled and post-rolled gears.