| Literature DB >> 28773938 |
Maira Berenice Moreno-Trejo1, Margarita Sánchez-Domínguez2.
Abstract
The synthesis that is described in this study is for the preparation of silver nanoparticles of sizes ranging from 10 nm to 30 nm with a defined shape (globular), confirmed by UV-vis, SEM, STEM and DLS analysis. This simple and favorable one-step modified Tollens reaction does not require any special equipment or other stabilizing or reducing agent except for a solution of purified mesquite gum, and it produces aqueous colloidal dispersions of silver nanoparticles with a stability thatexceeds three months, a relatively narrow size distribution, a low tendency to aggregate and a yield of at least 95% for all cases. Reaction times are between 15 min and 60 min to obtain silver nanoparticles in concentrations ranging from 0.1 g to 3 g of Ag per 100 g of reaction mixture. The proposed synthetic method presents a high potential for scale-up, since its production capacity is rather high and the methodology is simple.The synthesis that is described in this study is for the preparation of silver nanoparticles of sizes ranging from 10 nm to 30 nm with a defined shape (globular), confirmed by UV-vis, SEM, STEM and DLS analysis. This simple and favorable one-step modified Tollens reaction does not require any special equipment or other stabilizing or reducing agent except for a solution of purified mesquite gum, and it produces aqueous colloidal dispersions of silver nanoparticles with a stability thatexceeds three months, a relatively narrow size distribution, a low tendency to aggregate and a yield of at least 95% for all cases. Reaction times are between 15 min and 60 min to obtain silver nanoparticles in concentrations ranging from 0.1 g to 3 g of Ag per 100 g of reaction mixture. The proposed synthetic method presents a high potential for scale-up, since its production capacity is rather high and the methodology is simple.Entities:
Keywords: NP synthesis; mesquite gum; modified Tollens method; silver nanoparticles
Year: 2016 PMID: 28773938 PMCID: PMC5456612 DOI: 10.3390/ma9100817
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1UV-VIS absorption spectra of silver nanoparticles with different initial AgNO3 concentrations: (A) 0.5 M diluted 1:1000 15 min treatment; (B) 0.2 M diluted 1:1000 15 min treatment; (C) 0.1 M diluted 1:1000 15 min treatment; (D) 0.05 M diluted 1:100 15 min treatment; (E) 0.01 M diluted 1:10 15 min heat treatment; (F) 0.01 M diluted 1:10 30 min heat treatment; (G) 0.01 M diluted 1:10 60 min heat treatment; and (H) Mesquite Gum, same conditions as 0.01 M diluted 1:10, 15 min heat treatment sample. The mentioned dilutions were only for measurement of UV-Vis spectra, after Ag NPs synthesis.
Figure 2Micrographs of silver nanoparticles synthesized at different AgNO3 concentrations: (A) concentration 0.01 mol/L (15 min, 1:1 AgNO3:MG); (B) concentration 0.2 mol/L (15 min, 1:1 AgNO3:MG); and (C) concentration 0.5 mol/L (15 min, 1:1 AgNO3:MG).
Figure 3STEM micrographs of silver nanoparticles concentration 0.01 M, 15 min, 1:1 AgNO3:MG: (A) bright field; (B) dark field; and (C) measurement of interplanar distance for a particular nanoparticle. Silver nanoparticles concentration 0.2 M, 15 min, 1:1 AgNO3:MG: (D) bright field; (E) dark field; and (F) crystalline features. Silver nanoparticles concentration 0.5 M; 15 min, 1:1 AgNO3:MG: (G) bright field; (H) dark field; and (I) crystalline features.
Measurements of the effective hydrodynamic diameter (DLS data) of Ag NPs samples synthesized at different conditions.
| Sample Silver Concentration (mol/L) | Time in Treatment (min) | AgNO3:Mesquite Gum Ratio | PdI | SIZE (d.nm) ± SE (% Volume) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Peak | 2nd Peak | ||||
| 0.01 | 15 | 1:1 | 0.159 | 10.3 ± 3.1 (99.4) | 65.9 ± 20.6 (0.6) |
| 0.05 | 15 | 1:1 | 0.225 | 27.9 ± 11.3 (95.9) | 4674 ± 1009 (4.1) |
| 0.1 | 15 | 1:1 | 0.252 | 35.4 ± 13.9 (86.2) | 4585 ± 1053 (13.8) |
| 0.2 | 15 | 1:1 | 0.205 | 32.8 ± 13.5 (100) | - |
| 0.5 | 15 | 1:1 | 0.221 | 35.9 ± 13.9 (94) | 4920 ± 889.7 (6) |
| 0.01 | 30 | 1:1 | 0.232 | 15.9 ± 3.1 (95.2) | 67.4 ± 18.1 (4.8) |
| 0.01 | 60 | 1:1 | 0.175 | 12.3 ± 2.5 (93.8) | 60.4 ± 21.4 (6.2) |
| 0.05 | 30 | 1:1 | 0.169 | 33.2 ± 7.5 (100) | - |
| 0.05 | 60 | 1:1 | 0.315 | 26.9 ± 4.1 (100) | - |
| 0.2 | 15 | 1:0.3 | 0.276 | 28.9 ± 12.9 (96.1) | 4965 ± 866.3 (3.9) |
| 0.2 | 15 | 1:0.5 | 0.306 | 22.9 ± 14.6 (100) | |
Follow-up of the colloidal stability of Ag NPs samples synthesized at different conditions after one month of synthesis: hydrodynamic diameter (DLS data).
| Sample Silver (mol/L) | Time in Treatment (min) | AgNO3:Mesquite Gum Ratio | PdI | Size (d.nm) ± SE (% Volume) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Peak | 2nd Peak | ||||
| 0.01 | 15 | 1:1 | 0.739 | 9.9 ± 7.6 (96.5) | 4329 ± 1172 (3.3) |
| 0.05 | 15 | 1:1 | 0.225 | 27.7 ± 10.1 (92) | 4946 ± 881.1 (8) |
| 0.1 | 15 | 1:1 | 0.252 | 30.4 ± 12.1 (100) | - |
| 0.2 | 15 | 1:1 | 0.205 | 31.6 ± 11.2 (100) | - |
| 0.5 | 15 | 1:1 | 0.221 | 31.4 ± 10.7 (100) | - |
| 0.01 | 30 | 1:1 | 0.396 | 11.4 ± 3.4 (91) | 56.06 ± 37.5(5.6) |
| 0.01 | 60 | 1:1 | 0.391 | 10.3 ± 1.5 (98.1) | 5283 ± 711.4 (1.9) |
| 0.05 | 30 | 1:1 | 0.194 | 31.0 ± 11.5 (100) | - |
| 0.05 | 60 | 1:1 | 0.315 | 28.0 ± 9.9 (99) | 251.5 ± 55.2 (1) |
| 0.2 | 15 | 1:0.3 | 0.321 | 48.9 ± 12.9 (92.8) | 5225 ± 793.5 (5.8) |
| 0.2 | 15 | 1:0.5 | 0.302 | 42.6 ± 21.7 (98) | 3125 ± 85.5 (2) |
Follow-up of the colloidal stability of Ag NPs samples synthesized at different conditions after three months of synthesis: hydrodynamic diameter (DLS data).
| Sample Silver (mol/L) | Time in Treatment (min) | AgNO3:Mesquite Gum Ratio | PdI | Size (d.nm) ± SE (% Volumen) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Peak | 2nd Peak | ||||
| 0.01 | 15 | 1:1 | 0.380 | 35.6 ± 17.3 (77.3) | 5462 ± 634.8 (18.7) |
| 0.05 | 15 | 1:1 | 0.141 | 28.4 ± 9.3(100) | - |
| 0.1 | 15 | 1:1 | 0.179 | 31.4 ± 6.5 (100) | - |
| 0.2 | 15 | 1:1 | 0.237 | 30.3 ± 5.8 (100) | - |
| 0.5 | 15 | 1:1 | 0.195 | 32.1 ± 10.5 (100) | - |
| 0.01 | 30 | 1:1 | 0.237 | 51.8 ± 11.7 (100) | - |
| 0.01 | 60 | 1:1 | 0.149 | 10.1 ± 2.1 (94.7) | 53.3 ± 5.3 (5.3) |
| 0.05 | 30 | 1:1 | 0.204 | 31.2 ± 6.3 (100) | - |
| 0.05 | 60 | 1:1 | 0.378 | 26.7 ± 12.4 (94.4) | 5456 ± 636.8 (5.6) |
| 0.2 | 15 | 1:0.3 | 0.402 | 88.9 ± 5.6 (92.8) | 7225 ± 954.7 (8.2) |
| 0.2 | 15 | 1:0.5 | 0.398 | 62.9 ± 18.7 (95) | 3125 ± 85.5 (5) |
Figure 4IR spectra of: (A) solid powder of mesquite gum; and (B) dried 0.5 mol/L 15 min 1:1 silver NPs.
Silver ion concentration by ion selective electrode measure and assessment of % Ag.
| Sample Name, Reaction Time, Diluted | Total Ag (M) | Electrode Potential (mV) | Ag+ (M) | Ag0 (M) | Concentration of Ag0 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.01 30 min 1:10 | 0.00093819 | 201.5 | 7.67183 × 10−6 | 0.000930516 | 99.1822713 |
| 0.01 30 min 1:100 | 0.00009382 | 197 | 2.78488 × 10−7 | 9.35403 × 10−5 | 99.70316447 |
| 0.01 60 min 1:10 | 0.00093819 | 250 | 6.43172 × 10−6 | 0.000931756 | 99.31445266 |
| 0.01 60 min 1:100 | 0.00009382 | 168.6 | 5.17802 × 10−8 | 9.3767 × 10−5 | 99.94480825 |
| 0.05 30 min 1:10 | 0.00416826 | 230.3 | 2.00221 × 10−6 | 0.004166256 | 99.95196538 |
| 0.05 30 min 1:100 | 0.00041683 | 198.3 | 3.00781 × 10−7 | 0.000416525 | 99.92784012 |
| 0.05 60 min 1:10 | 0.00416826 | 243.1 | 4.27378 × 10−6 | 0.004163984 | 99.89746842 |
| 0.05 60 min 1:100 | 0.00041683 | 201.7 | 3.67893 × 10−7 | 0.000416458 | 99.91173937 |
| 0.1 1:10 | 0.00797664 | 180.3 | 1.03554 × 10−7 | 0.007976537 | 99.99870178 |
| 0.1 1:100 | 0.00079766 | 190.6 | 1.90614 × 10−7 | 0.000797473 | 99.97610351 |
| 0.2 1:10 | 0.01519171 | 155 | 2.31355 × 10−8 | 0.015191687 | 99.99984771 |
| 0.2 1:100 | 0.00151917 | 210.2 | 6.08695 × 10−7 | 0.001518562 | 99.95993242 |
| 0.5 1:10 | 0.03312199 | 212.8 | 7.10051 × 10−7 | 0.03312128 | 99.99785626 |
| 0.5 1:100 | 0.0033122 | 221 | 1.15412 × 10−6 | 0.003311045 | 99.96515559 |
Figure 5Schematic diagram of steric stability conferred to silver nanoparticles by the mesquite gum.
Figure 6Schematic diagram of purposed mechanism of aggregation.
Figure 7Schematic diagram of proposed reduction reaction.
Comparison of the estimated production capacity for several methods of Ag nanoparticle synthesis reported in the literature and the method reported here.
| Authors | Method | Estimated Production Capacity (g Ag/100 g) * | Reaction Time | Particle Size | Observations | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moreno & Sánchez | Aqueous, Tollens with mesquite gum | ~3.0 (with 0.5 M AgNO3) | ~15–30 min | ~30 nm | High colloidal stability in water (tested for 3 months) | This work |
| He et al. | Aqueous, Tollens, glucose, Al(NO3)3 | ~0.43 | 60 min | Nanosheets 27 nm thickness | Dimension of nanosheets, hundreds of nm | [ |
| Kora et al. | Aqueous, kondagogu gum, Autoclave 121 °C | ~0.01 | ~20–60 min | Various, 3–20 nm | Need high temperature and pressure | [ |
| Dong et al. | Aqueous, Acacia (Arabic) gum, 60–80 °C | ~0.06 | ~3 h | 2–20 nm | High colloidal stability in water (tested for 1 month) | [ |
| Kora et al. | Aqueous, ghatti gum, Autoclave 121 °C | ~0.01 | ~20–60 min | Variou, 5–30 nm | Need high temperature and pressure | [ |
| Sosa et al. | W/O microemulsion, 70 °C, NaBH4 | ~1.5 | ~2.5 h | 9 nm | Toluene, AOT, SDS, 7 washings with water/acetone | [ |
| Melendrez et al. | Ethyleneglycol, PVP, microwave | ~1.0 | ~10 min | Nanowires 70–110 nm diameter | Need microwave treatment, solvent (ethyleneglycol) | [ |
| He et al. | Aqueous, 12–2-12 gemini surfactant, NaBH4 | ~0.54 | ~10 h | 11 nm | 12–2-12 surfactant not available commercially | [ |
| Li et al. | Tween® 80, 100 °C | ~3.2 | 1–3 days | Various, 20–40 nm | High surfactant concentration (about 95%); high temperature and large reaction times | [ |
| Toisawa et al. | Ethanol, toluene, dodecylamine Ag2O powder, ultrasound | 2–9 | 3–10 h | Various, 10–30 nm | Several hours of ultrasound needed; toluene used | [ |
* Estimated by the authors of the present work, taking into account the experimental data provided in the corresponding references.