| Literature DB >> 28773913 |
Miruna Silvia Stan1, Ionela Cristina Nica2, Anca Dinischiotu3, Elena Varzaru4, Ovidiu George Iordache5, Iuliana Dumitrescu6, Marcela Popa7,8, Mariana Carmen Chifiriuc9,10, Gratiela G Pircalabioru11,12, Veronica Lazar13,14, Eugenia Bezirtzoglou15, Marcel Feder16, Lucian Diamandescu17.
Abstract
Our research was focused on the evaluation of the photocatalytic and antimicrobial properties, as well as biocompatibility of cotton fabrics coated with fresh and reused dispersions of nanoscaled TiO₂-1% Fe-N particles prepared by the hydrothermal method and post-annealed at 400 °C. The powders were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Mössbauer spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The textiles coated with doped TiO₂ were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray analyses, and their photocatalytic effect by trichromatic coordinates of the materials stained with methylene blue and coffee and exposed to UV, visible and solar light. The resulting doped TiO₂ consists of a mixture of prevailing anatase phase and a small amount (~15%-20%) of brookite, containing Fe3+ and nitrogen. By reusing dispersions of TiO₂-1% Fe-N, high amounts of photocatalysts were deposited on the fabrics, and the photocatalytic activity was improved, especially under visible light. The treated fabrics exhibited specific antimicrobial features, which were dependent on their composition, microbial strain and incubation time. The in vitro biocompatibility evaluation on CCD-1070Sk dermal fibroblasts confirmed the absence of cytotoxicity after short-term exposure. These results highlight the potential of TiO₂-1% Fe-N nanoparticles for further use in the development of innovative self-cleaning and antimicrobial photocatalytic cotton textiles. However, further studies are required in order to assess the long-term skin exposure effects and the possible particle release due to wearing.Entities:
Keywords: TiO2-1% Fe-N; antimicrobial properties; biocompatibility; photocatalysis; textiles
Year: 2016 PMID: 28773913 PMCID: PMC5457061 DOI: 10.3390/ma9090789
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1X-ray diffraction patterns of TiO2-1% Fe-N samples obtained at pH 8.5 (a) and pH 5.5 (b).
Rietveld refinement parameters for TiO2-1% Fe-N hydrothermal samples.
| Sample | Lattice Parameters (Å) | Crystallite Size (nm) | Phase Assignment/Abundance (wt %) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| Sample 1 (pH = 8.5) | 3.7912 | - | 9.4909 | 12.3 | Anatase 85.3 |
| 9.1429 | 5.4215 | 5.2450 | 8.5 | Brookite 14.7 | |
| Sample 2 (pH = 5.5) | 3.7907 | - | 9.4743 | 10.4 | Anatase 79.4 |
| 9.1629 | 5.4437 | 5.1809 | 11.6 | Brookite 20.6 | |
| Errors | ±0.0005 | ±0.0005 | ±0.0005 | ±1.5 | ±1.4 |
Figure 2Mössbauer spectra of the hydrothermal samples at pH 8.5 (a) and 5.5 (b) together with the computer fit (continuous lines).
Mössbauer fit parameters for the for TiO2-1% Fe-N hydrothermal samples. IS, isomer shift.
| Sample | IS (mm/s) | ΔEQ (mm/s) | Γ (mm/s) | Areas (%) | Site/Phase Assignment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample 1 | 0.417 | 0.598 | 0.45 | 85.2 | Fe3+: Anatase |
| 0.096 | 0.703 | 0.46 | 14.8 | Fe3+: Brookite | |
| Sample 2 | 0.419 | 0.551 | 0.40 | 79.4 | Fe3+: Anatase |
| 0.182 | 0.587 | 0.41 | 20.6 | Fe3+: Brookite | |
| Errors | ±0.002 | ±0.004 | ±0.03 | ±0.4 | - |
Figure 3Photocatalytic degradation versus time of Sample 1 (a) and Sample 2 (b).
Figure 4SEM analysis of untreated (control) and treated cotton fabrics.
EDX analyses of the cotton knit treated with TiO2-1% Fe-N (Samples 1 and 2) and polyacrylic binder.
| Element, wt % | HT1 | HT1 ITO | HT2 | HT2 ITO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C K | 46.19 | 45.99 | 49.20 | 68.01 |
| O K | 43.71 | 34.93 | 45.77 | 29.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Trichromatic coordinates of the cotton knit treated with TiO2-1% Fe-N (Samples 1 and 2), stained with 0.01 g/L methylene blue (MB) and coffee exposed to visible light (Xenotest).
| Sample | L* | a* | b* | dL* | da* | db* | dE* | dC* | dH* | Grades |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control cotton knit stained with MB | 86.98 | −2.06 | −2.53 | 0.23 | 5.62 | 5.14 | 7.62 | −7.59 | 0.61 | 2 |
| Cotton knit ITO-MB | 82.32 | −3.83 | −7.02 | 2.46 | 1.04 | 1.23 | 2.94 | −1.58 | 0.30 | 3.50 |
| HT1-MB | 84.75 | −4.32 | −2.93 | 5.48 | 13.37 | 9.68 | 17.39 | −16.5 | −0.25 | 1 |
| HT1 ITO-MB | 90.35 | −2.01 | −0.34 | 13.31 | 14.66 | 13.27 | 23.84 | −19.48 | −3.39 | 1 |
| HT2-MB | 82.13 | −6.05 | −5.68 | 2.07 | 11.82 | 7.59 | 14.2 | −13.96 | 1.57 | 1 |
| HT2 ITO-MB | 89.68 | −3.07 | −1.47 | 5.92 | 14.92 | 10.49 | 2.2 | −18.2 | −1.2 | 1 |
| Control cotton knit stained with coffee | 80.26 | 4.96 | 19.72 | 3.46 | −0.68 | 0.45 | 3.56 | 0.26 | 0.77 | 3 |
| Cotton knit ITO-coffee | 71.95 | 6.86 | 22.17 | 1.82 | −0.72 | −2.42 | 3.12 | −2.53 | −0.03 | 3.50 |
| HT1-coffee | 78.38 | 5.2 | 21.92 | 5.06 | −0.91 | 0.6 | 5.18 | 22.18 | - | 2.5 |
| HT1 ITO-coffee | 82.25 | 4.99 | 22.61 | 4.88 | −1.33 | 0.68 | 5.1 | 0.34 | 1.46 | 2.5 |
| HT2-coffee | 81.29 | 5.25 | 23.69 | 4.05 | −1.16 | 0.6 | 4.25 | 0.3 | 1.27 | 2.5 |
| HT2 ITO-coffee | 80.98 | 5.56 | 25.26 | 2.9 | −0.67 | 1.54 | 3.35 | 1.34 | 1.01 | 3 |
Trichromatic coordinates of the cotton knit treated with TiO2-1% Fe-N (Samples 1 and 2), stained with 0.01 g/L MB and coffee, exposed to UV light.
| Sample | L* | a* | b* | dL* | da* | db* | dE* | dC* | dH* | Grades |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control cotton knit stained with MB | 87.38 | −5.06 | −2.61 | 3.2 | 5.68 | 6.58 | 9.26 | −8.44 | −2.07 | 1.5 |
| Cotton knit ITO-MB | 77.67 | −18.76 | −15.15 | −2.36 | −0.61 | −0.19 | 2.44 | 0.59 | −0.24 | 3.50 |
| HT1-MB | 81.7 | −8.01 | −3.02 | 1.7 | 7.09 | 8.03 | 10.84 | −10.15 | −3.42 | 1.5 |
| HT1 ITO-MB | −8.47 | −1.55 | 2.12 | 9.41 | 11.52 | 15.03 | 14.46 | −13.54 | −6.17 | 1 |
| HT2-MB | 82.13 | −6.05 | −5.68 | 2.07 | 11.82 | 7.59 | 14.2 | −13.96 | 1.57 | 1 |
| HT2 ITO-MB | 87.76 | −7.04 | 2.31 | 2.93 | 7.46 | 10.02 | 12.83 | −9.02 | −8.65 | 1 |
| Control cotton knit stained with coffee | 73.19 | 5.96 | 21.56 | −5.72 | 1.71 | 5.22 | 7.93 | 5.49 | −0.29 | 2 |
| Cotton knit ITO-coffee | 67.97 | 7.91 | 27.01 | 1.41 | −0.68 | −1.58 | 2.22 | −1.71 | 0.20 | 4.00 |
| HT1-coffee | 74.76 | 5.13 | 21.55 | 0.4 | −0.01 | 2.18 | 2.22 | 2.11 | 0.55 | 4 |
| HT1 ITO-coffee | 75.47 | 7.31 | 24.87 | 3.06 | −1.12 | −0.30 | 3.27 | −0.63 | 0.98 | 3 |
| HT2-coffee | 76.05 | 5.28 | 24.39 | 1.97 | −0.45 | 3.18 | 3.77 | 2.99 | 1.18 | 3 |
| HT2 ITO-coffee | 74.83 | 6.01 | 24.71 | 2.07 | −0.77 | 2.26 | 2.97 | 1.98 | 1.34 | 3.5 |
Trichromatic coordinates of the cotton knit treated with TiO2-1% Fe-N (Samples 1 and 2), stained with 0.01 g/L MB and coffee and exposed to solar light.
| Sample | L* | a* | b* | dL* | da* | db* | dE* | dC* | dH* | Grades |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control cotton knit stained with MB | 85.7 | −3.41 | −4.67 | 4.85 | 5.59 | 4.58 | 8.71 | −7.13 | 1.21 | 1.5 |
| Cotton knit ITO-MB | 78.79 | −10.54 | −11.62 | 0.08 | 9.36 | 4.93 | 10.58 | −10.20 | 2.83 | 1.50 |
| HT1-MB | 88.5 | −1.68 | −2.87 | 5.93 | 11.48 | 7.19 | 14.79 | −13.24 | 2.86 | 1 |
| HT2-MB | 85.36 | −3.02 | −2.4 | 1.58 | 7.77 | 6.53 | 10.27 | −10.15 | −0.14 | 1.5 |
| Control cotton knit stained with coffee | 69.48 | 8.07 | 26.77 | 0.23 | −1.08 | −3.57 | −3.73 | 0.01 | 1.01 | 3.5 |
| Cotton knit ITO-coffee | 68.44 | 7.21 | 24.32 | −1.43 | −0.64 | −3.35 | 3.70 | −3.40 | −0.32 | 3.00 |
| HT1-coffee | 78.17 | 4.64 | 21.04 | 2.54 | −0.59 | 1.25 | 2.9 | 1.08 | 0.87 | 3.5 |
| HT2-coffee | 80.26 | 3.71 | 17.58 | 5.8 | −2.16 | −3.38 | 7.05 | −3.8 | 1.29 | 2 |
Figure 5Graphic representation of the log10 colony forming units (CFU)/mL values of microbial biofilm cells grown on the cotton knit samples after 15 min of incubation.
Figure 6Graphic representation of the logarithmic values of CFU/mL of viable cell counts recovered after 24 h of contact with the cotton knit samples.
Representation of the material samples exhibiting antimicrobial activity against the tested microbial strains at different time intervals.
| Microbial Strain | 15 min | 24 h | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gram negative bacilli |
| HT1, HT2, HT1 ITO | - |
|
| HT1, HT2, HT1 ITO, HT2 ITO | HT1, HT2 ITO | |
| Gram positive bacilli |
| HT1, HT1 ITO | - |
| Gram positive cocci |
| HT1, HT2, HT2 ITO | HT2, HT1 ITO, HT2 ITO |
|
| HT1, HT2, HT1 ITO | - | |
Figure 7Biocompatibility of cotton knit treated with TiO2-1% Fe-N samples after 4 h of incubation with dermal fibroblast cells as shown by cell viability, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release and NO level. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3) and represented relative to the untreated cotton sample (control). * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 compared to the control.
Figure 8Actin cytoskeleton organization of dermal fibroblast cells after 4 h of incubation with cotton knit treated with TiO2-1% Fe-N samples. F-actin (green) was labeled with phalloidin-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), and nuclei (blue) were counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI). Scale bar: 100 µm.