| Literature DB >> 28773877 |
Aishu Yin1, Feng Xu2, Xueming Zhang3.
Abstract
Biomass is the most plentiful and well-utilized renewable carbon resource on the earth. Direct conversion of biomass to carbon aerogel provides a promising approach to develop adsorbent materials. In the present work, the effect of presence of water during hydrothermal treatment and holding temperature during post-pyrolysis process have been investigated for the preparation of carbon aerogels (CAs) using eggplant as raw material. The results showed that the addition of water during hydrothermal treatment was advantageous for the preparation of CA samples with higher surface area and stronger hydrophobicity, resulting in superior adsorption capacities of CAs for both oil and organic solvents compared with that fabricated without the presence of water. The optimized carbon aerogel possessed higher specific surface of 249 m²·g-1 and exhibited excellent hydrophobicity with a water contact angle of 133°. The adsorption capacities of carbon aerogel for oils and organic solvents could reach 35-45 times its own weight. In addition, the adsorbed oil and organic solvents could be recovered by distillation, and the regenerated carbon aerogels samples exhibited the stable performance and outstanding reusability. Therefore, the carbon aerogel has great potential in application of oil recovery and environmental protection.Entities:
Keywords: adsorption oil; biomass; carbon aerogels; hydrothermal treatment; recyclable
Year: 2016 PMID: 28773877 PMCID: PMC5457041 DOI: 10.3390/ma9090758
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1SEM images of eggplant hydrogels (EH) and carbon aerogels (CAs). (a) Ec; (b) EH1; (c) EH2; (d) CA1; (e) CA2; (f) CA3; (g) CA4.
Figure 2Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) of eggplant gels. (a) Ec; (b) EH1; (c) EH2; (d) CA1.
Figure 3Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of different eggplant hydrogels. (a) EH1; (b) EH2.
Physical characteristics of carbon aerogels.
| Samples | Nitrogen Adsorption | Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surface Area (m2·g−1) | Pore Volume (cm3·g−1) | Pore Diameter (nm) | Average Pore Diameter (nm) | Total Porosity (%) | |
| CA1 | 43 | 0.07 | 6.72 | 5968 | 88 |
| CA2 | 48 | 0.08 | 8.72 | 6185 | 89 |
| CA3 | 239 | 0.14 | 3.65 | 10,751 | 92 |
| CA4 | 249 | 0.16 | 2.55 | 16,192 | 94 |
Figure 4Pore size distribution of carbon aerogels.
Figure 5Water contact angle of carbon aerogels. The error bar in each column indicates the standard deviation.
Figure 6Adsorption capacity of carbon aerogels for gasoline. The error bar in each column indicates the standard deviation. Inset is the removal of chloroform dyed with Sudan red from underwater.
Figure 7Recyclability of carbon aerogels for adsorption of ethanol (a) and ethyl acetate (b) with a distillation method.
Treatment methods and pyrolyzing procedures for preparing carbon aerogels.
| Hydrothermal Treatment | Carbonization | |
|---|---|---|
| Pyrolyzing Procedures (1) c | Pyrolyzing Procedures (2) d | |
| EH1
| CA1 | CA2 |
| EH2
| CA3 | CA4 |
without water addition during hydrothermal treatment; with water addition during hydrothermal treatment; the temperature was raised to 250 °C and held for 1 h, and then the temperature was raised to 800 °C and held for 1 h under N2 atmosphere; the temperature was raised to 400 °C and held for 1 h, and then the temperature was raised to 800 °C and held for 1 h under N2 atmosphere.
Figure 8Mercury cumulative intrusion (filled dots) and extrusion curves (hollow dots) of carbon aerogels.