| Literature DB >> 28773795 |
Hae-Weon Lee1, Mansoo Park2, Jongsup Hong3, Hyoungchul Kim4, Kyung Joong Yoon5, Ji-Won Son6, Jong-Ho Lee7, Byung-Kook Kim8.
Abstract
Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) are inevitably affected by the tensile stress field imposed by the rigid substrate during constrained sintering, which strongly affects microstructural evolution and flaw generation in the fabrication process and subsequent operation. In the case of sintering a composite cathode, one component acts as a continuous matrix phase while the other acts as a dispersed phase depending upon the initial composition and packing structure. The clustering of dispersed particles in the matrix has significant effects on the final microstructure, and strong rigidity of the clusters covering the entire cathode volume is desirable to obtain stable pore structure. The local constraints developed around the dispersed particles and their clusters effectively suppress generation of major process flaws, and microstructural features such as triple phase boundary and porosity could be readily controlled by adjusting the content and size of the dispersed particles. However, in the fabrication of the dense electrolyte layer via the chemical solution deposition route using slow-sintering nanoparticles dispersed in a sol matrix, the rigidity of the cluster should be minimized for the fine matrix to continuously densify, and special care should be taken in selecting the size of the dispersed particles to optimize the thermodynamic stability criteria of the grain size and film thickness. The principles of constrained sintering presented in this paper could be used as basic guidelines for realizing the ideal microstructure of SOFCs.Entities:
Keywords: cathode; composite; constrained sintering; electrolyte; solid oxide fuel cell
Year: 2016 PMID: 28773795 PMCID: PMC5510732 DOI: 10.3390/ma9080675
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Summary of key processing parameters used by several research groups to determine the optimum composition of GDC/LSCF composite cathodes.
| Reference | Powder Characteristics | Consolidation Method | Sintering Condition | GDC/LSCF by Vol % | Polarization Resistance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDC | LSCF | |||||
| [ | 2.3 | 0.7 | Slurry painting followed by cold isostatic pressing | 800–900 °C/2 h | 36/64 | 0.6 Ω∙cm2 @590 °C |
| [ | 2.3 | 0.7 | Spin coating | 900 °C/2 h | 50/50 | 0.33 Ω∙cm2 @600 °C |
| [ | 0.16 | 0.47 | Screen printing | 1000 °C/2 h | 45/55 | 0.22 Ω∙cm2 @700 °C |
| [ | Nextech | GNP | Screen printing | 975 °C/2 h | 65/35 | 0.27 Ω∙cm2 @600 °C |
Figure 1Cross-section image of the cell with functionally graded tri-layer LSM-YSZ composite cathode.
Structural characteristics of the functionally graded tri-layer LSM-YSZ composite cathode.
| YSZ Particle Size (μm) | Porosity (%) | Average Pore Diameter (μm) | Thickness (μm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Top Layer | 2 | 43 | 1.31 | 7 |
| Middle Layer | 0.2 | 39 | 1.03 | 7 |
| Bottom Layer | 0.02 | 36 | 0.88 | 6 |
Figure 2Relative density of LSM-YSZ composites as a function of YSZ content and particle size of YSZ sintered at (A) 1100 and (B) 1150 °C.
Figure 3Comparison of shrinkage behavior between the free sintering of bulk alumina and the constrained sintering of alumina thick film on a rigid alumina substrate.
Figure 4Sintering behavior of LSM-YSZ composite with (A) slow- and (B) fast-sintering YSZ particles dispersed in LSM matrix under free sintering condition.
Figure 5Sintering behavior of LSM-YSZ composite with (A) slow- and (B) fast-sintering YSZ particles dispersed in LSM matrix under constrained (red) and free (black) sintering conditions.
Figure 6Sintered surface of a YSZ thin electrolyte layer obtained with the chemical solution containing (A) 9 and (B) 18 vol % YSZ nanoparticles.
Figure 7Sintered surface of a YSZ thin electrolyte layer obtained with the chemical solution containing 5 vol % YSZ nanoparticles.
Figure 8SEM images of the bi-layer electrolyte fabricated by chemical solution deposition route collected in (A) secondary electron and (B) back-scattered electron modes.