| Literature DB >> 28773716 |
Erika Fantino1, Annalisa Chiappone2, Flaviana Calignano3, Marco Fontana4, Fabrizio Pirri5,6, Ignazio Roppolo7.
Abstract
Polymer nanocomposites have always attracted the interest of researchers and industry because of their potential combination of properties from both the nanofillers and the hosting matrix. Gathering nanomaterials and 3D printing could offer clear advantages and numerous new opportunities in several application fields. Embedding nanofillers in a polymeric matrix could improve the final material properties but usually the printing process gets more difficult. Considering this drawback, in this paper we propose a method to obtain polymer nanocomposites by in situ generation of nanoparticles after the printing process. 3D structures were fabricated through a Digital Light Processing (DLP) system by disolving metal salts in the starting liquid formulation. The 3D fabrication is followed by a thermal treatment in order to induce in situ generation of metal nanoparticles (NPs) in the polymer matrix. Comprehensive studies were systematically performed on the thermo-mechanical characteristics, morphology and electrical properties of the 3D printed nanocomposites.Entities:
Keywords: 3D printing; polymer-based nanocomposites; silver nanoparticles
Year: 2016 PMID: 28773716 PMCID: PMC5456854 DOI: 10.3390/ma9070589
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Sketch of Digital Light Processing (DLP) setup that projects dynamic digital masks on the photocurable formulation featuring the formation of the polyethylene glycol diacrylate structure. Subsequent Thermal treatment, with the formation of the silver nanoparticles by reduction of the metal precursors.
Figure 23D objects produced by DLP technique from the formulation containing polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA) and 15 phr of silver nitrate. (a) Honeycomb structure as printed; (b,c) samples after the thermal treatments; the metallic aspect induced by the presence of the silver nanoparticles is clearly visible.
Figure 3(a) Isothermal treatments performed in air at different temperature (100 °C, 150 °C and 200 °C); (b) thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) plot of the sample PEGDA_15 phr AgNO3 heated in nitrogen at a rate of 10 °C/min.
Figure 4UV-Vis plots of samples treated at (a) 100 °C; (b) 150 °C; (c) 200 °C in air and (d) 200 °C in vacuum obtained after different heating times.
Figure 5(a) Cross section of a sample treated 1 h at 150 °C in air; (b) Cross section of a sample treated 1 h at 150 °C in vacuum; (c) Cross section of the core of a sample treated 1 h at 150 °C in vacuum.
Tg values measured in DSC for PEGDA containing 15 phr of AgNO3 after the thermal post treatment at different temperature (100 °C, 150 °C and 200 °C) at different time (10′, 30′ and 60′).
| Treatment | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| No TT | −28 | ||
| TT_Air | @100 °C | @150 °C | @200 °C |
| 10′ | −25 | −25 | −25 |
| 30′ | −25 | −26 | −38 |
| 60′ | −26 | −30 | −37 |
| TT_Vacuum | - | @150 °C | @200 °C |
| 30′ | - | −26 | −26 |
| 60′ | −27 | −28 | |
Figure 6(a) Relationship between resistance and heating temperatures measured on flat printed specimens; (b) Conductivity and resistance values measured on flat samples treated at different temperatures for different times.
Figure 7I–V plot obtained by contating an honeycomb structure treated at 200 °C in vacuum. Inset: the current flowing trough the structure was sufficient to achieve the illumination of a led.