| Literature DB >> 28773551 |
Abd Elaziz Sarrai1,2,3, Salah Hanini4, Nachida Kasbadji Merzouk5, Djilali Tassalit6, Tibor Szabó7, Klára Hernádi8, László Nagy9.
Abstract
The feasibility of the application of the Photo-Fenton process in the treatment of aqueous solution contaminated by Tylosin antibiotic was evaluated. The Response Surface Methodology (RSM) based on Central Composite Design (CCD) was used to evaluate and optimize the effect of hydrogen peroxide, ferrous ion concentration and initial pH as independent variables on the total organic carbon (TOC) removal as the response function. The interaction effects and optimal parameters were obtained by using MODDE software. The significance of the independent variables and their interactions was tested by means of analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a 95% confidence level. Results show that the concentration of the ferrous ion and pH were the main parameters affecting TOC removal, while peroxide concentration had a slight effect on the reaction. The optimum operating conditions to achieve maximum TOC removal were determined. The model prediction for maximum TOC removal was compared to the experimental result at optimal operating conditions. A good agreement between the model prediction and experimental results confirms the soundness of the developed model.Entities:
Keywords: CCD; Photo-Fenton; RSM; Tylosin
Year: 2016 PMID: 28773551 PMCID: PMC5456803 DOI: 10.3390/ma9060428
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Chemical structure of Tylosin.
Figure 2Schematic diagram of photochemical reaction device.
Optimization of parameters, experimental range and level of independent variables, on photo-Fenton degradation of Tylosin.
| Range and Level | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independent variable | −α | −1 | 0 | +1 | +α |
| H2O2 ( | 0.132 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.468 |
| pH ( | 1.89 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 3.5 | 3.9 |
| Fe2+ Concentration ( | 0.64 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 7.36 |
α = 1.68 (star or axial point for orthogonal CCD in the case of three independent variables) and their actual values were rounded.
Experimental designs of the five levels and their experimental results and predictive values.
| Run Number | TOC Removal (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observed | Predicted | ||||
| 1 | 0.2 | 2.3 | 2 | 74.83 | 73.13 |
| 2 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 2 | 65.01 | 68.36 |
| 3 | 0.2 | 3.5 | 2 | 55.68 | 56.51 |
| 4 | 0.2 | 2.3 | 6 | 85.92 | 83.45 |
| 5 | 0.4 | 3.5 | 2 | 31.15 | 34.85 |
| 6 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 6 | 96.04 | 96.44 |
| 7 | 0.2 | 3.5 | 6 | 71.24 | 69.12 |
| 8 | 0.4 | 3.5 | 6 | 62.29 | 65.22 |
| 9 | 0.13 | 2.9 | 4 | 87.28 | 91.12 |
| 10 | 0.46 | 2.9 | 4 | 89.42 | 83.83 |
| 11 | 0.3 | 1.92 | 4 | 61.03 | 61.87 |
| 12 | 0.3 | 3.88 | 4 | 24.22 | 21.64 |
| 13 | 0.3 | 2.9 | 0.73 | 65.29 | 62.21 |
| 14 | 0.3 | 2.9 | 7.26 | 95.1 | 96.44 |
| 15 | 0.3 | 2.9 | 4 | 88.15 | 88.27 |
| 16 | 0.3 | 2.9 | 4 | 88.63 | 88.27 |
| 17 | 0.3 | 2.9 | 4 | 88.93 | 88.27 |
| 18 | 0.3 | 2.9 | 4 | 88.45 | 88.27 |
| 19 | 0.3 | 2.9 | 4 | 87.85 | 88.27 |
| 20 | 0.3 | 2.9 | 4 | 88.32 | 88.36 |
ANOVA for the response surface quadratic model.
| Source | Sum of Squares | Degree of Freedom | Mean Squares | Remark | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 7698.9 | 9 | 855.4 | 75.7 | <0.001 | Significant |
| 66.1 | 1 | 66.1 | 5.6 | 0.038 | Significant | |
| 1957.4 | 1 | 1957.4 | 166.8 | <0.001 | Significant | |
| 1417.9 | 1 | 1417.9 | 120.9 | <0.001 | Significant | |
| 142.6 | 1 | 142.6 | 12.1 | 0.005 | Significant | |
| 157.7 | 1 | 157.7 | 13.4 | 0.005 | Significant | |
| 2.6 | 1 | 2.6 | 0.2 | 0.640 | – | |
| 0.0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7581 | – | |
| 3901.9 | 1 | 3901.9 | 332.6 | <0.001 | Significant | |
| 126.9 | 1 | 126.9 | 10.8 | 0.005 | Significant | |
| Residual | 112.9 | 10 | 11.3 | – | – | – |
| Pure error | 0.4 | 5 | 0.0913 | – | – | – |
| Total | 7811.8 | 19 | 411.147 | – | – | – |
| – | – | – | – | – |
p < 0.05 is considered as significant.
Figure 3Effects of pH, H2O2 and Fe2+ initial concentration on TOC removal rate. (a,b) Fe2+ concentration was kept constant at 4 mg∙L−1; (c,d) H2O2 concentration was kept constant at 0.3 g∙L−1; (e,f) pH value was kept constant at 2.9.
Comparison of the predictive and the experimental result optimum values of TOC removal.
| Parameter | Optimum Value | TOC Removal (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Predictive | Experimental | ||
| 0.4 | 100 | 97.1 | |
| 2.6 | – | – | |
| 6 | – | – | |