| Literature DB >> 28773526 |
Elisa Rupérez1, José María Manero2, Luis-Alberto Bravo-González3, Eduardo Espinar4, F J Gil5.
Abstract
A bioactive layer, free of nickel, has been performed for its greater acceptability and reliability in clinical applications for NiTi shape memory alloys. In the first step, a safe barrier against Ni release has been produced on the surface by means of a thicker rutile/anastase protective layer free of nickel. In the second step, a sodium alkaline titanate hydrogel, which has the ability to induce apatite formation, has been performed from oxidized surface. An improvement of host tissue-implant integration has been achieved in terms of Ni ions release and the bioactivity of the treated NiTi alloys has been corroborated with both in vitro and in vivo studies. The transformation temperatures (As, Af, Ms, and Mf), as well as the critical stresses (σβ⇔M), have been slightly changed due to this surface modification. Consequently, this fact must be taken into account in order to design new surface modification on NiTi implants.Entities:
Keywords: NiTi alloy; bioactivity; biomimetic surfaces; shape memory effect; superelasticity
Year: 2016 PMID: 28773526 PMCID: PMC5456747 DOI: 10.3390/ma9060402
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Variation of the titanium oxide composition as a function of depth for different surface treatments studied (UT: untreated samples; OT: treated samples).
| Treatment | Sputtering Time (min)/Depth (nm) | Chemical Element | % of total Ti 2p Signal |
|---|---|---|---|
| UT | 0/0 | Ti0 Ti+2, Ti+3/Ti+4 | 8/10/82 |
| OT | 0/0 | Ti+4 | 100 |
| OT | 1/6 | Ti3+ Ti4+ | 61/39 |
Figure 1XPS depth profile of the nickel for austenitic alloy, after oxidation treatment.
Figure 2(a) SEM micrograph showing a microporous layer of sodium titanate on NiTi surface (alloy A); and (b) GI-XRD pattern of sodium titanate layer.
Figure 3(a) SEM micrograph of apatite layer on NiTi surface (Alloy A) after soaked in SBF for three days; and (b) GI-XRD pattern showing peaks corresponding to the apatite crystals (32° and 26°).
Figure 4(a) Cell spreading and cell number after 2 h of culture corresponding to different surfaces: C, Teflon; UT, untreated Ti; OX, oxidized Ti; and BI, bioactive Ti; (b) Representative fluorescence microscopy images of MG63 cells on untreated NiTi (A) and bioactive NiTi (B) after seven days of incubation (alloy A).
Bone index contact after one and six weeks of implantation (columns) in percent.
| Type of Implants | 1 Week | 6 Weeks |
|---|---|---|
| NiTi | 9% (±4%) | 44% (±11%) |
| NiTi bioactive | 27% (±5%) | 68% (±15%) |
Figure 5Histological micrograph showing the interface bone–implant for the bioactive NiTi alloy (×400). The implant–bone interface is almost completely covered after six weeks of implantation.
Transformation temperatures (°C) for the Ni-Ti studied.
| Alloy | Ms | Mf | As | Af |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | 74.1 ± 0.3 | 55.7 ± 0.4 | 86.9 ± 0.1 | 129.3 ± 0.7 |
| M-bioactive | 64.2 ± 0.6 | 46.1 ± 0.5 | 71.0 ± 0.1 | 109.3 ± 0.7 |
| A | 9.8 ± 0.2 | 6.2 ± 0.3 | 7.1 ± 0.4 | 20.4 ± 0.5 |
| A-bioactive | 0.5 ± 2.4 | −3.9 ± 1.2 | −0.4 ± 1.7 | 11.2 ± 4.5 |
Critical stresses at different test temperatures for austenitic NiTi alloy.
| Autenitic NiTi Alloy | Critical Stresses | 20 °C | 37 °C |
|---|---|---|---|
| NiTi original | σβ→SIM (MPa) | 150 ± 17 | 262 ± 24 |
| σSIM→β (MPa) | 55 ± 5 | 211 ± 19 | |
| NiTi bioactive | σβ→SIM (MPa) | 180 ± 15 | 290 ± 22 |
| σSIM→β (MPa) | 65 ± 9 | 183 ± 19 |