| Literature DB >> 28773485 |
María Jesús Pastor1, Cristián Cuerva2, José A Campo3, Rainer Schmidt4, María Rosario Torres5, Mercedes Cano6.
Abstract
Ionic liquidEntities:
Keywords: ionic conductivity; ionic liquid crystals; ionic salts; liquid crystals; polymorphism; smectic mesophase
Year: 2016 PMID: 28773485 PMCID: PMC5503038 DOI: 10.3390/ma9050360
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Nomenclature proposed for the salts described in this work, including the numbering.
| Family | I | II | III | IV | V |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BF4− | ReO4− | CF3SO3− | NO3− | CuCl42− | |
| 12 | |||||
| 14 | |||||
| 16 | |||||
| 18 |
Scheme 1Synthetic route to obtain the ionic salts. The numbering scheme used in the 1H-NMR assignments is also denoted.
Figure 1Crystal structure of [HOOR(12)pyH][ReO4] (5): Layer-type distribution showing interdigitated chains. The inset shows the ORTEP plot with 40% probability.
Thermal data of compounds of the families I (BF4-n), II (ReO4-n), III (CF3SO3-n), IV (NO3-n) and V (CuCl4-n).
| Compound | Transition 1 | T2/°C | ΔH/kJmol−1 | Compound | Transition 1 | T2/°C | ΔH/kJmol−1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cr→Cr′ | 99 | 2.0 | Cr→Cr′ | 81 | 14.5 | ||
| Cr′→SmA | 132 | 25.0 | Cr′→Cr″ | 98 | 2.2 | ||
| SmA→Iso | 163 3 | – | Cr″→SmA→Iso | 165 | 18.7 4 | ||
| Cr→Cr′ | 72 | 14.1 | Iso→SmA→Cr′ | 142 | −19.3 4 | ||
| Cr′→Cr″ | 106 | 11.9 | Cr′→Cr | 95 | −1.8 | ||
| Cr″→SmA | 136 | 26.4 | Cr→Cr′ | 116 | 8.8 | ||
| SmA→Iso | 170 3 | – | Cr′→SmA→Iso | 169 | 21.6 4 | ||
| Cr→Cr′ | 83 | 10.2 | Iso→SmA | 156 | −1.0 | ||
| Cr′→SmA | 137 | 35.7 | SmA→Cr′ | 142 | −19.5 | ||
| SmA→Iso | 176 3 | – | Cr′→Cr | 112 | −7.0 | ||
| Cr→Cr′ | 85 | 55.0 4 | Cr→Cr′ | 79 | 1.5 | ||
| Cr′→Cr″ | 117 | Cr′→Cr″ | 117 | 14.1 | |||
| Cr″→SmA | 133 | Cr″→SmA | 155 | 14.1 | |||
| SmA→Iso | 175 3 | – | SmA→Iso | 173 | 0.2 | ||
| Cr→Cr′ | 106 | 13.5 | Iso→SmA | 170 | −0.8 | ||
| Cr′→Cr″ | 114 | 7.9 | SmA→Cr′ | 129 | −15.7 | ||
| Cr″→SmA | 138 | 17.7 | Cr′→Cr | 110 | −11.4 | ||
| SmA→Iso | 173 | 1.6 | Cr→Cr′ | 84 | 5.0 | ||
| Cr→Cr′ | 105 | 26.2 4 | Cr′→Cr″ | 116 | 13.4 | ||
| Cr′→Cr″ | 116 | Cr″→SmA | 150 | 11.2 | |||
| Cr″→SmA | 133 | 34.7 | SmA→Iso | 192 | 0.2 | ||
| SmA→Iso | 186 | 0.5 | Iso→SmA | 166 | −0.5 | ||
| Cr→Cr′ | 111 | 29.6 | SmA→Cr | 111 | −27.0 | ||
| Cr′→SmA | 135 | 18.2 | Cr→SmA | 124 | 41.6 4 | ||
| SmA→Iso | 178 | 0.8 | SmA→Iso | 132 | |||
| Cr→Cr′ | 77 | 2.8 | Cr→SmA→Iso | 135 | 48.6 4 | ||
| Cr′→Cr″ | 107 | 22.4 | Cr→SmA→Iso | 136 | 56.4 4 | ||
| Cr″→SmA | 127 | 5.4 | Cr→SmA→Iso | 135 | 50.1 4 | ||
| SmA→Iso | 182 | 0.2 | Cr→SmC | 110 | 32.8 | ||
| SmC→Iso | 185 | 54.6 | |||||
| Cr→Cr′ | 79 | 73.1 4 | |||||
| Cr′→SmC | 92 | ||||||
| SmC→Cr″ | 108 | −34.2 | |||||
| Cr″→SmC | 174 | 42.9 | |||||
| SmC→Iso | 199 | 45.7 |
1 Cr, Cr′, Cr″ = solid phases, SmA = smectic A mesophase, SmC = smectic C mesophase, Iso = isotropic liquid; 2 DSC onset peaks given in the first heating process; 3 Detected by POM; 4 Overlapped processes.
Figure 2POM photomicrographs of: (a) BF at 114 °C on cooling; (b) ReO at 104 °C on cooling; (c) CF at 148 °C on cooling; (d) NO at 112 °C on cooling; (e) CuCl at 158 °C on heating; (f) CuCl at 111 °C on cooling.
Figure 3Phase transition temperatures of the different salts as dependent on the anion and the cation length.
Figure 4X-ray diffractograms of ReO (7) at (a) 25 °C; (b) 120 °C and (c) 140 °C on heating. The insets show a magnification of the XRD trace at the mesophase temperature (a) showing the (002) peak and (b) the broad halo corresponding to the liquid-like order of the molten alkyl chains.
Figure 5Schematic representation of the structural features: (a) [HOOR(16)pyH][ReO4] at the solid state based on the structure of ReO; (b) proposal for [HOOR(16)pyH][ReO4] at the SmA mesophase; and (c) proposal for [HOOR(12)pyH]2[CuCl4] at the SmC mesophase.
X-ray diffraction data of selected compounds.
| Compound | T/°C | 2 | [ | Lattice Parameter/Å | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 130 | 2.5 | 34.5 | 34.5 | (001) | ||
| 5.0 | 17.5 | 17.3 | (002) | |||
| 7.5 | 11.7 | 11.5 | (003) | |||
| 19 | 5.2 | – | halo | |||
| 140 | 1.8 | 47.0 | 47.0 | (001) | ||
| 3.6 | 24.5 | 23.5 | (002) | |||
| 20 | 4.9 | – | halo | |||
| 160 | 2.8 | 31.5 | 31.5 | (001) | ||
| 5.6 | 15.7 | 15.7 | (002) | |||
| 18 | 5.4 | – | halo | |||
| 120 | 3.2 | 27.1 | 27.1 | (001) | ||
| 6.3 | 13.9 | 13.6 | (002) | |||
| 18.5 | 5.3 | – | halo | |||
| 103 | 3.3 | 26.5 | 26.5 | (001) | ||
| 6.8 | 13.0 | 13.2 | (002) | |||
| 10.2 | 8.7 | 8.8 | (003) | |||
| 18.5 | 5.3 | – | halo |
1 dobs and dcal are the observed and calculated diffraction spacings; 2 [hkl] are the Miller indices of the reflections.
Figure 6(a–c) Z″ vs. Z′ and (d) C′ vs. f plots for the Cl−, CuCl42− and ReO4− salts; (e) σ′ vs. f plots for the favorable ReO4− salt.
Figure 7(a–c) C′ vs. T and (d–f) σ′ vs. f plots for the Cl−, CuCl42− and ReO4−- based compounds.
Activation energies E for the Cl−, CuCl42− and ReO4− salts in the solid phase and the mesophase. Note that the Cl− does not exhibit a mesophase. Conductivity values are given at 410 K in the CuCl42− and ReO4− mesophases and the solid phase for the Cl−.
| [A] | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cl− | 3.08/3.14 | – | 6.3 × 10−7 |
| CuCl42− | 2.20 | 5.10 | 8.7 × 10−8 |
| ReO4− | 2.71 | 4.61 | 8.7 × 10−6 |