| Literature DB >> 28773414 |
Valentina Nicolini1, Monica Caselli2, Erika Ferrari3, Ledi Menabue4, Gigliola Lusvardi5, Monica Saladini6, Gianluca Malavasi7.
Abstract
In this paper, we report the study of the loading and the release of curcuminoids by bioactive glasses (BG) and mesoporous bioactive glasses (MBG). Through a detailed spectroscopic study, it was possible to determine the amount and the type of molecules released in water and in simulated body fluid (SBF). In particular, curcumin and K2T21 show a good ability to be released in di-keto and keto-enolic form, depending from the pH. However, after 24 h, the amount of pristine curcumin release is very low with a consequent increment of degradation products derived by curcuminoids. The presence of -OH groups on curcuminoids is a fundamental pre-requisite in order to obtain a high loading and release in polar solution such as water and SBF. The substrate on which we loaded the drugs does not seem to affect significantly the loading and the release of the drugs. The environment, instead, affects the release: for all the drugs, the release in SBF, buffered at pH of 7.4, is slightly worse than the release in water (basic pH values).Entities:
Keywords: bioactive glass; curcuminoids; drug release
Year: 2016 PMID: 28773414 PMCID: PMC5502983 DOI: 10.3390/ma9040290
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Structures of the investigated drugs loaded in the bioactive glasses: (a) curcumin; (b) K2T21; and (c) K2T23.
Figure 2Structure of the self-assembling polymer Pluronic P123.
Comparison between the composition (mM) of human plasma and simulate body fluid (SBF).
| Na+ | K+ | Ca2+ | Mg2+ | Cl− | HPO42− | HCO3− | SO42− | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma | 142.0 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 103.0 | 1.0 | 27.0 | 0.5 |
| SBF | 142.0 | 5.7 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 147.8 | 1.0 | 4.2 | 0.5 |
Percentage (w/w) of the loaded drug on the glass delivery system via evaporation method (SD = standard deviation obtained by three different replicate determinations).
| Glass | Drug | %drug ( |
|---|---|---|
| BG | Curcumin | 3.1 ± 0.1 |
| K2T21 | 3.3 ± 0.1 | |
| K2T23 | 2.3 ± 0.2 | |
| MBG | Curcumin | 3.9 ± 0.2 |
| K2T21 | 3.1 ± 0.1 | |
| K2T23 | 2.4 ± 0.1 |
N2 adsorption analysis performed on MBG sample before and after the soaking in ethanol.
| SSA (m2/g) | BJH Mesopore Area (m2/g) | BJH Average Pore Width (Å) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BG before | 120 | 10 | – |
| BG after | 93 | 3 | – |
| MBG before | 472 | 224 | 30 |
| MBG after | 359 | 162 | 30 |
Figure 3Static release tests performed in pure water at different times: (a) curcumin; (b) K2T21; and (c) K2T23.
Figure 4UV-Vis spectra and cumulative release in pure water (expressed in %) of BG and MBG samples loaded with: curcumin (a–d); K2T21 (e–h); and K2T23 (i–l).
Figure 5UV-Vis spectra and cumulative release in SBF (expressed in %) of BG and MBG samples loaded with: curcumin (a–d); and K2T21 (e–h).
Figure 6UV-Vis spectra in SBF of (a) BG and (b) MBG samples loaded with K2T23.