| Literature DB >> 28773365 |
Sung-Hwan Jang1,2, Yong-Lae Park3,4, Huiming Yin5.
Abstract
Multifunctional polymer-based composites have been widely used in various research and industrial applications, such as flexible and stretchable electronics and sensors and sensor-integrated smart structures. This study investigates the influence of particle coalescence on the mechanical and electrical properties of spherical nickel powder (SNP)/polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) composites in which SNP was aligned using an external magnetic field. With the increase of the volume fraction of the SNP, the aligned SNP/PDMS composites exhibited a higher tensile strength and a lower ultimate strain. In addition, the composites with aligned SNP showed a lower percolation threshold and a higher electrical conductivity compared with those with randomly dispersed SNP. However, when the concentration of the SNP reached a certain level (40 vol. %), the anisotropy of the effective material property became less noticeable than that of the lower concentration (20 vol. %) composites due to the change of the microstructure of the particles caused by the coalescence of the particles at a high concentration. This work may provide rational methods for the fabrication of aligned composites.Entities:
Keywords: alignment; coalescence; electrical conductivity; magnetic field; mechanical property; metal-polymer composite
Year: 2016 PMID: 28773365 PMCID: PMC5502886 DOI: 10.3390/ma9040239
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Experimental setup and sample preparation for electrical conductivity and tensile test: (a) Experimental set-up; and (b) Sample preparation for: (i) electrical conductivity and (ii) tensile test.
Figure 23D simulation results of particle alignments in composite structures; (a) 5 vol. % nickel particles; and (b) 30 vol. % nickel particles.
Figure 3Alignment process of SNP in the matrix (10 vol. %) with magnetization times: (a) 1 second; (b) 5 seconds; (c) 10 seconds; (d) 15 seconds; (e) 20 seconds; and (f) 25 seconds.
Figure 4Illustration of particle alignment process in the pre-polymer state: (a) Without magnetic field; (b) Magnetic field with short magnetization time; and (c) Magnetic field with long magnetization time.
Figure 5OM images of SNP in the matrix at different concentration; (a) 10 vol. % SNP without magnetic field; (b) 10 vol. % SNP under magnetic field; (c) 20 vol. % SNP under magnetic field; and (d) 30 vol. % SNP under magnetic field.
Figure 6(a) Stress-strain curve of tensile strength testing for pure PDMS and SNP/PDMS composites; and (b) tensile stress ratio of parallel to perpendicular SNP configurations.
Maximum tensile strength and strain of PDMS and SNP/PDMS composites.
| Sample | Ultimate Tensile Strength (MPa) | Maximum Tensile Strain (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Pure PDMS | 5.39 ± 1.23 | 144 ± 9.3 |
| 10 vol. % (Perpendicular) | 5.11 ± 1.53 | 141 ± 10.2 |
| 10 vol. % (Parallel) | 6.78 ± 1.52 | 127 ± 9.1 |
| 20 vol. % (Perpendicular) | 6.90 ± 1.42 | 137 ± 11.5 |
| 20 vol. % (Parallel) | 7.48 ± 1.48 | 120 ± 10.2 |
| 30 vol. % (Perpendicular) | 6.98 ± 1.30 | 97 ± 9.1 |
| 30 vol. % (Parallel) | 7.80 ± 1.02 | 89 ± 9.4 |
| 40 vol. % (Perpendicular) | 8.23 ± 1.21 | 82 ± 8.8 |
| 40 vol. % (Parallel) | 8.43 ± 1.43 | 79 ± 10.3 |
Figure 7Electrical conductivity of SNP/PDMS composite.
Summary of electrical conductivity of SNP/PDMS composite.
| Volume Fraction of SNP (vol. %) | Electrical Conductivity (S/m) | Ratio of Parallel to Perpendicular | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perpendicular | Parallel | ||
| 10 | 1.0 ± 0.04 × 10−14 | 1.0 ± 0.05 × 10−14 | 1.0 |
| 20 | 1.0 ± 0.05 × 10−14 | 3.2 ± 0.03 × 10−10 | 32,000.0 |
| 30 | 4.4 ± 0.03 × 10−9 | 6.1 ± 0.04 × 10−8 | 13.9 |
| 40 | 8.2 ± 0.07 × 10−7 | 1.3 ± 0.05 × 10−6 | 1.6 |