| Literature DB >> 28773254 |
Zhengyao Qu1, Peng Liu2, Xiaoyu Yang3, Fazhou Wang4, Wenqin Zhang5, Chenggang Fei6.
Abstract
In the present study, BiVO₄ sample was prepared under different pH 0.5-13 without capping agent. Different morphology characteristics were observed, such as sheet crystal structure, cross crystal structure and branching crystal structure. The mechanism of the formation of BiVO₄ nanostructure was discussed. Under acid condition, sheet crystal structure was obtained. The phenomenon could be attributed to polymerization of vanadate in the presence of H⁺. In the weak alkaline solution, across structure and branching type morphology was obtained. The photocatalytic efficiency for the samples ranked as pH 5 > pH 3 > pH 7 > pH 9 > pH 1 > pH 11 > pH 13 > blank, which is in good agreement with X-ray diffraction (XRD) result. E. coli envelop was damaged in the presence of BiVO₄ under visible light. The protrusion on envelop was diminished by BiVO₄. Attenuated Total Reflection Fourier transformed Infrared Spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) results suggested the intensity was weakened for the amide, phosphoric, -COO- group and C-H bond in lipopolysaccharides (LPS), peptidoglycan and periplasm molecules.Entities:
Keywords: BiVO4; E. coli; envelop; monoclinic scheelite structure; photocatalytic efficiency
Year: 2016 PMID: 28773254 PMCID: PMC5456712 DOI: 10.3390/ma9030129
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the BiVO4 samples prepared at different hydrothermal pH values.
Figure 2Morphology of BiVO4 prepared under pH = 0.5 (a;b), pH =1 (c;d), pH = 3 (e;f), pH = 5 (g;h), pH = 7(i;j), pH = 9 (k;l), pH = 11 (m;n), pH = 13 (o;p).
The length and thickness of BiVO4 prepared under different pH.
| pH | Length (µm) | Thickness (µm) |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 20–30 | 2 |
| 1 | 10–20 | 1 |
| 3 | 1–9 | 0.5 |
| 5 | 0.8–1.0 | 0.1 |
| 7 | 0.1–1.0 | 0.05 |
| 9 | 0.05 | 0.01 |
| 11 | 1–3 | 0.01 |
| 13 | 5–10 | 0.01 |
Figure 3UV-vis diffuse reflectance absorption (A); and photocatalytic efficiency (B) of BiVO4 prepared under different pH values.
Figure 4Field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) images with different magnification of bacteria before (A1 and A2) and after (B1 and B2) treatment of BiVO4 with illumination of visible light. The cells in image A2 and B2 was derived from image A1 and B1 separately with higher magnification.
Figure 5Schematic molecular representation of E. coli envelops.
Figure 6Attenuated total reflection fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) of E. coli envelop after treatment of BiVO4 with illumination of visible light.