| Literature DB >> 28773156 |
Arunkumar Jayakumar1, Sarat Singamneni2, Maximiano Ramos3, Ahmed M Al-Jumaily4, Sethu Sundar Pethaiah5.
Abstract
The conventional gas diffusion layer (GDL) of polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cells incorporates a carbon-based substrate, which suffers from electrochemical oxidation as well as mechanical degradation, resulting in reduced durability and performance. In addition, it involves a complex manufacturing process to produce it. The proposed technique aims to resolve both these issues by an advanced 3D printing technique, namely selective laser sintering (SLS). In the proposed work, polyamide (PA) is used as the base powder and titanium metal powder is added at an optimised level to enhance the electrical conductivity, thermal, and mechanical properties. The application of selective laser sintering to fabricate a robust gas diffusion substrate for PEM fuel cell applications is quite novel and is attempted here for the first time.Entities:
Keywords: PEM fuel cell; carbon paper; gas diffusion layer; membrane and electrode assembly; polyamide; selective laser sintering; titanium
Year: 2017 PMID: 28773156 PMCID: PMC5551839 DOI: 10.3390/ma10070796
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1A 2D view of a gas diffusion electrode (GDE) indicating the catalyst layer and gas diffusion layer (GDL; comprising a backing layer and mesoporous layer, MPL).
Figure 2Manufacturing steps involved in conventional GDL fabrication (SGL 39 BC) [8]. PTFE: polytetrafluoroethylene.
Laser power required to sinter various configurations of polyamide (PA)/titanium.
| Laser Power (W) | Polyamide/Titanium Composition (%) |
|---|---|
| 15 | 10/90 |
| 12 | 20/80 |
| 9 | 30/70 |
Figure 3SEM image of the proposed gas diffusion material. (a) Surface; (b) Cross-section.
The elemental analysis of the proposed composite material after selective laser sintering (SLS).
| C | N | O | Ti | Zr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S7-_PA | 66.1 | 8.3 | 9.1 | 14.8 | 1.7 |
Thermophysical properties of polyamide-titanium composite.
| Temperature/°C | Thermal Diffusivity mm2/s | Specific Heat kJ/(kg·K) | Thermal Conductivity W/(m·K) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 0.680 | 1.289 | 0.588 |
| 80 | 0.521 | 1.559 | 0.544 |
| 140 | 0.408 | 1.870 | 0.512 |
Figure 4Polarization plots for the 3D-printed GDL [80% PA + 20% Ti] used membrane and electrode assembly (MEA) and normal MEA tested with humidified H2/O2 at 75 °C and 15 psi pressure.
Comparison of functional properties of the proposed material with Sigracet™ 39 BC [8].
| Material Properties | Proposed Material (Polyamide-80% & Titanium-20%) Fabricated by SLS | Sigracet™ 39 BC |
|---|---|---|
| Thickness (µm) | 430 | 325 |
| Basic Weight (gm−2) | 380 | 105 |
| In-Plane Conductivity (S/cm) | 1–10 * S/cm | 170 ** |
| Thermal Conductivity (W/(mK)) | 0.588–0.512 (Using Laser Flash Analysis) | 0.25 |
| Porosity (%) | ca. 42% (Using ImageJ) | 52 |
| Tensile Strength (N/cm) | ≥4 | NA |
* Uncompressed; ** Compressed with 1 MPa.