| Literature DB >> 28773017 |
Zhanfeng Yang1, Yong Tian2, Weibin Li3, Haiqiang Zhou4, Weibin Zhang5, Jingming Li6.
Abstract
The measurement of acoustic nonlinear response is known as a promising technique to characterize material micro-damages. In this paper, nonlinear ultrasonic approach is used to characterize the evolution of fatigue induced micro-cracks in polymer bonded explosives. The variations of acoustic nonlinearity with respect to fatigue cycles in the specimens are obtained in this investigation. The present results show a significant increase of acoustic nonlinearity with respect to fatigue cycles. The experimental observation of the correlation between the acoustic nonlinearity and fatigue cycles in carbon/epoxy laminates, verifies that an acoustic nonlinear response can be used to evaluate the progressive fatigue damage in the granular polymer bonded explosives. The sensitivity comparison of nonlinear and linear parameters of ultrasonic waves in the specimens shows that nonlinear acoustic parameters are more promising indicators to fatigue induced micro-damage than linear ones. The feasibility study of the micro-damage assessment of polymer bonded explosives by nonlinear ultrasonic technique in this work can be applied to damage identification, material degradation monitoring, and lifetime prediction of the explosive parts.Entities:
Keywords: acoustic nonlinearity; fatigue; micro-cracks; polymer bonded explosives
Year: 2017 PMID: 28773017 PMCID: PMC5554041 DOI: 10.3390/ma10060660
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Block diagram of ultrasonic measurement system.
Figure 2Experimental time domain signal (a) and (b) frequency spectrum (FFT) of the signal.
Figure 3Comparison of higher harmonic generation in intact and damaged specimens.
Figure 4Experimental waveforms of ultrasonic waves in the specimens with higher density (a) and (b) lower density.
Figure 5Micrographs of specimens with (a) higher density and (b) lower density.
Figure 6Variation of relative acoustic nonlinear parameter versus fatigue cycles.
Figure 7Comparison of variations of acoustic nonlinear parameter and wave velocity to fatigue loadings in the specimens; the acoustic nonlinearity and wave velocity are normalized by the reference values of the raw material, = 1.31 and CRaw = 2.323 km/s, respectively.
Figure 8Optical (a) and computer tomographical image (b) of the specimen after 350 fatigue cycles.