| Literature DB >> 28772919 |
Ewelina Sobierajska1, Malgorzata Konopka2, Anna Janaszewska3, Kinga Piorecka4, Andrzej Blauz5, Barbara Klajnert-Maculewicz6,7, Maciej Stanczyk8, Wlodzimierz A Stanczyk9.
Abstract
Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS), bearing eight 3-chloroammoniumpropyl substituents, was studied as a potential nanocarrier in co-delivery systems with doxorubicin (DOX). The toxicity of doxorubicin and POSS:DOX complexes at four different molar ratios (1:1; 1:2, 1:4, 1:8) towards microvascular endothelial cells (HMEC-1), breast cancer cells (MCF-7), and human cervical cancer endothelial cells (HeLa) was determined. The rate of penetration of the components into the cells, their cellular localization and the hydrodynamic diameter of the complexes was also determined. A cytotoxicity profile of POSS:DOX complexes indicated that the POSS:DOX system at the molar ratio of 1:8 was more effective than free DOX. Confocal images showed that DOX co-delivery with POSS allowed for more effective penetration of doxorubicin through the cell membrane. Taking all the results into account, it can be claimed that the polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (T₈-POSS) is a promising, complex nanocarrier for doxorubicin delivery.Entities:
Keywords: POSS; co-delivery; doxorubicin; in vitro toxicity; silsesquioxane
Year: 2017 PMID: 28772919 PMCID: PMC5459003 DOI: 10.3390/ma10050559
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1The concept of co-delivery of polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) and doxorubicin (DOX) into the cell.
Figure 2The influence of doxorubicin and polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes co-delivered at different molar ratios on cell viability (A) of human breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7), (B) microvascular endothelial (HMEC-1), and (C) human cervical cancer endothelial (HeLa) cell lines. Data are presented as a percentage of control ± SD, * p < 0.05 (statistical significance between DOX and POSS:DOX complexes).
Comparison of IC50 values for free doxorubicin and doxorubicin co-delivered with polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane in three different cell lines.
| Sample | IC50 [µM/L] | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| MCF-7 | HeLa | HMEC-1 | |
| Doxorubicin (DOX) | 17.44 ± 5.23 | 1.45 ± 0.15 | 10.33 ±4.63 |
| POSS:DOX 1:1 | 13.65 ± 4.03 | 1.44 ± 0.12 | 10.92 ± 2.26 |
| POSS:DOX 1:2 | 76.97 ± 35.11 | 1.61 ± 0.26 | 14.81 ± 12.10 |
| POSS:DOX 1:4 | 109.10 ± 55.88 | 1.25 ± 0.08 | 9.11 ± 4.56 |
| POSS:DOX 1:8 | 2.69 ± 0.15 | 0.92 ± 0.09 | 2.51 ± 0.42 |
Figure 3The cellular uptake of doxorubicin (1 µM) and polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane co-delivered at different molar ratios by (A) human breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7), (B) microvascular endothelial (HMEC-1), and (C) human cervical cancer endothelial (HeLa) cell lines.
Figure 4Confocal images of MCF-7, HMEC-1 and HeLa cells treated with 1 µM doxorubicin or doxorubicin (1 µM) co-delivered and polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane at POSS:DOX = 1:8 molar ratio. Doxorubicin (red channel), cell nucleus stained with DAPI (blue channel), and overlapping channels. Scale bars: 10 µm.
Figure 5Hydrodynamic diameters of complexes formed by doxorubicin and polyhedral oligomericsilsesquioxanes (50 μM) at different molar ratios. Data are expressed as means ± SD. Statistical differences occurred for POSS and all conjugates at different molar ratios between 0 and 24 h of incubation.
Figure 6Proposed mechanism of complex formation by doxorubicin and polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane at different molar ratios.