| Literature DB >> 28772880 |
Tongqing Li1,2, Yuxing Peng3,4, Zhencai Zhu5,6, Shengyong Zou7, Zixin Yin8,9.
Abstract
Aiming at predicting what happens in reality inside mills, the contact parameters of iron ore particles for discrete element method (DEM) simulations should be determined accurately. To allow the irregular shape to be accurately determined, the sphere clump method was employed in modelling the particle shape. The inter-particle contact parameters were systematically altered whilst the contact parameters between the particle and wall were arbitrarily assumed, in order to purely assess its impact on the angle of repose for the mono-sized iron ore particles. Results show that varying the restitution coefficient over the range considered does not lead to any obvious difference in the angle of repose, but the angle of repose has strong sensitivity to the rolling/static friction coefficient. The impacts of the rolling/static friction coefficient on the angle of repose are interrelated, and increasing the inter-particle rolling/static friction coefficient can evidently increase the angle of repose. However, the impact of the static friction coefficient is more profound than that of the rolling friction coefficient. Finally, a predictive equation is established and a very close agreement between the predicted and simulated angle of repose is attained. This predictive equation can enormously shorten the inter-particle contact parameters calibration time that can help in the implementation of DEM simulations.Entities:
Keywords: DEM simulation; angle of repose; contact parameters; iron ore particles; mills
Year: 2017 PMID: 28772880 PMCID: PMC5459068 DOI: 10.3390/ma10050520
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1The illustration of the contact forces between particle i and particle j.
The real physical properties of thirty-six particles using a high-accuracy 3D scanner.
| No | Ψ | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12.00 | 10.13 | 9.04 | 306.59 | 371.26 | 249.76 | 0.815 |
| 2 | 17.28 | 10.96 | 9.32 | 384.21 | 450.97 | 284.34 | 0.740 |
| 3 | 16.33 | 8.81 | 10.56 | 362.99 | 417.46 | 270.08 | 0.744 |
| 4 | 17.08 | 7.66 | 10.56 | 356.01 | 396.36 | 260.90 | 0.733 |
| 5 | 11.99 | 11.10 | 9.00 | 315.12 | 386.53 | 256.56 | 0.814 |
| 6 | 8.90 | 7.80 | 6.57 | 177.12 | 140.36 | 130.59 | 0.737 |
| 7 | 9.06 | 10.32 | 8.40 | 207.58 | 184.78 | 156.86 | 0.756 |
| 8 | 7.27 | 6.81 | 7.92 | 157.98 | 132.59 | 125.72 | 0.796 |
| 9 | 9.87 | 6.98 | 6.58 | 190.06 | 172.74 | 149.97 | 0.789 |
| 10 | 7.68 | 8.26 | 7.16 | 164.40 | 138.55 | 129.47 | 0.787 |
| 11 | 10.87 | 9.99 | 5.76 | 216.31 | 198.35 | 164.45 | 0.760 |
| 12 | 8.66 | 4.68 | 9.18 | 196.37 | 179.84 | 154.05 | 0.785 |
| 13 | 10.06 | 7.24 | 7.52 | 188.76 | 165.99 | 146.04 | 0.77 |
| 14 | 6.90 | 6.68 | 5.60 | 138.72 | 124.48 | 120.54 | 0.87 |
| 15 | 9.78 | 5.50 | 8.02 | 177.04 | 145.33 | 133.65 | 0.75 |
| 16 | 7.25 | 13.93 | 10.87 | 330.06 | 358.60 | 244.05 | 0.74 |
| 17 | 7.73 | 15.17 | 9.13 | 335.25 | 350.82 | 240.511 | 0.72 |
| 18 | 14.14 | 7.09 | 8.76 | 272.36 | 283.56 | 208.69 | 0.77 |
| 19 | 13.98 | 8.13 | 8.80 | 319.42 | 409.57 | 266.66 | 0.83 |
| 20 | 10.51 | 8.15 | 8.50 | 246.43 | 265.3 | 199.65 | 0.81 |
| 21 | 14.23 | 8.60 | 9.19 | 340.58 | 383.07 | 255.03 | 0.749 |
| 22 | 14.40 | 10.72 | 5.92 | 289.56 | 272.20 | 203.08 | 0.701 |
| 23 | 11.70 | 13.77 | 6.36 | 328.38 | 343.20 | 237.02 | 0.722 |
| 24 | 10.23 | 8.57 | 10.07 | 272.33 | 328.38 | 230.14 | 0.845 |
| 25 | 9.44 | 11.33 | 5.86 | 254.76 | 284.11 | 208.96 | 0.820 |
| 26 | 14.01 | 7.77 | 7.67 | 258.21 | 239.39 | 186.41 | 0.722 |
| 27 | 10.33 | 6.63 | 10.22 | 237.68 | 236.24 | 184.78 | 0.777 |
| 28 | 12.54 | 6.90 | 7.06 | 230.27 | 217.36 | 174.80 | 0.759 |
| 29 | 10.26 | 7.30 | 9.09 | 209.29 | 203.88 | 167.49 | 0.800 |
| 30 | 9.04 | 8.21 | 7.40 | 207.62 | 211.68 | 171.73 | 0.827 |
| 31 | 10.84 | 6.59 | 6.823 | 190.17 | 150.06 | 136.54 | 0.718 |
| 32 | 9.02 | 7.13 | 6.232 | 167.01 | 144.34 | 133.05 | 0.797 |
| 33 | 7.10 | 8.25 | 7.374 | 171.66 | 141.85 | 131.51 | 0.766 |
| 34 | 6.94 | 8.27 | 8.773 | 178.29 | 163.69 | 144.69 | 0.812 |
| 35 | 8.66 | 6.82 | 7.359 | 167.92 | 148.69 | 135.71 | 0.808 |
| 36 | 8.11 | 7.29 | 6.48 | 146.37 | 120.78 | 118.14 | 0.807 |
Figure 2Iron ore particle modelling by the sphere clump method (60 spheres).
Figure 3Forming process of the particle pile on the plane. (a) Initial state of the simulation; (b) being in the particle’s accumulating; (c) sand-pile stabilized.
Input parameters for EDEM simulations.
| Material Parameters | Symbols | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Particle density (kg m−3) | 3886 | |
| Particle shear modulus (Gpa) | 2.587 | |
| Particle Poisson’s ratio | 0.283 | |
| Wall density (kg m−3) | 1200 | |
| Wall shear modulus (Gpa) | 1.05 | |
| Wall Poisson’s ratio | 0.41 | |
| Particle-wall restitution coefficient | 0.5 | |
| Particle-wall static friction coefficient | 0.6 | |
| Particle-wall rolling friction coefficient | 0.05 | |
| Particle-particle restitution coefficient | 0–0.6 | |
| Particle-particle static friction coefficient | 0–0.8 | |
| Particle-particle rolling friction coefficient | 0–0.2 |
Figure 4Sphericity of thirty-six iron ore particles.
Percent of the particle size used in the simulations.
| Volume Intervals (mm3) | Percent |
|---|---|
| 100–200 | 44.44% |
| 200–300 | 25% |
| 300–400 | 22.22% |
| 400–500 | 8.33% |
Figure 5The geometrical model of iron ore particles with various numbers of sphere clumps.
Figure 6The change in volume error and EIT error with number of sphere clumps.
Figure 7Effect of velocity on angle of speed when e = 0.05, μ = 0.15, μ = 0.01.
Figure 8Effect of the restitution coefficient on the angle of repose.
Figure 9The effect of the static friction coefficient on the angle of repose.
Figure 10The effect of the rolling friction coefficient on the angle of repose.
Figure 11The effect of the simulated angle of repose with the predicted angle of repose.