| Literature DB >> 28772816 |
Lihui Xuan1, Guangping Han2, Dong Wang3, Wanli Cheng4, Xun Gao5, Feng Chen6,7, Qingde Li8,9.
Abstract
Surface modification and characterization of titanium dioxide (TiO₂) nanoparticles and their roles in thermal, mechanical, and accelerated aging behavior of foamed wheat straw fiber/polypropylene (PP) composites are investigated. To improve the dispersion of nanoparticles and increase the possible interactions between wheat straw fiber and the PP matrix, the surface of the TiO₂ nanoparticles was modified with ethenyltrimethoxy silane (A171), a silane coupling agent. The grafting of A171 on the TiO₂ nanoparticles' surface was characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The wheat straw fibers treated with A171 and modified TiO₂ nanoparticles were characterized by FTIR and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). FTIR spectra confirmed that the organic functional groups of A171 were successfully grafted onto the TiO₂ nanoparticles and wheat straw fibers, and the modified TiO₂ nanoparticles were adsorbed onto the wheat straw fibers. Thermogravimetric analysis showed that a higher thermal stability of the wheat straw fiber was obtained with the modified TiO₂ nanoparticles. The flexural, tensile, and impact properties were improved. A higher ultraviolet (UV) stability of the samples treated with modified TiO₂ nanoparticles was exhibited by the study of the color change and loss in mechanical properties.Entities:
Keywords: UV stability; foamed wheat straw fiber/polypropylene composites; mechanical properties; surface-modified TiO2 nanoparticles; thermostability
Year: 2017 PMID: 28772816 PMCID: PMC5459069 DOI: 10.3390/ma10050456
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Optical microscope images of (a) untreated wheat straw fiber and (b) wheat straw fiber treated by A171 and modified TiO2 nanoparticles.
Formulations of various samples for the preparation of the foamed wheat straw fiber/PP composites.
| E | Modified TiO2 Nanoparticles (wt.%) | Silane Coupling Agent (wt.%) | Wheat Straw Fiber (wt.%) | PP (wt.%) | AC (wt.%) | ZnO (wt.%) | CaCO3 (wt.%) | Paraffin (wt.%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 0 | 1 | 29 | 62.5 | 2 | 0.5 | 4 | 1 |
| B | 1 | 1 | 29 | 61.5 | 2 | 0.5 | 4 | 1 |
| C | 1.5 | 1 | 29 | 61 | 2 | 0.5 | 4 | 1 |
| D | 2 | 1 | 29 | 60.5 | 2 | 0.5 | 4 | 1 |
| E | 2.5 | 1 | 29 | 60 | 2 | 0.5 | 4 | 1 |
| F | 3 | 1 | 29 | 59.5 | 2 | 0.5 | 4 | 1 |
Figure 2The samples of (a) before the UV aging test; (b) being UV aging tested; and (c) after the UV aging test.
Figure 3The samples’ (a) tensile property being tested; (b) the flexural property being tested; and (c) the impact property being tested.
Figure 4FTIR spectra of (a) untreated TiO2 and (b) A171-grafted TiO2 nanoparticles.
Figure 5FTIR spectra of (a) untreated wheat straw fiber and (b) wheat straw fiber treated by A171 and modified TiO2 nanoparticles.
Figure 6SEM images of (a) untreated TiO2 and (b) A171-grafted TiO2 nanoparticles.
Figure 7TGA curves of wheat straw fiber with different surface-modified TiO2 nanoparticle contents.
Figure 8The change in color of foamed wheat straw fiber/PP composites with different modified TiO2 nanoparticle content after UV weathering.
Figure 9The change in mechanical properties of wheat straw fiber/PP composites with different modified TiO2 nanoparticle content after UV weathering.
The change and reduction ratio in mechanical properties of wheat straw fiber/PP composites with different modified TiO2 nanoparticle content after UV weathering.
| Modified Nano TiO2 Level (wt.%) | 0 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flexural properties | Before UV exposure | Flexural strength (MPa) | 11.02 | 13.66 | 13.85 | 15.56 | 15.74 | 18.13 |
| Flexural modulus (MPa) | 413.59 | 653.62 | 680.33 | 767.42 | 795.99 | 984.05 | ||
| After UV exposure | Flexural strength (MPa) | 6.89 | 11.2 | 11.63 | 13.38 | 13.85 | 16.5 | |
| Flexural strength loss (%) | 37.48 | 18.01 | 16.03 | 14.01 | 12.01 | 8.99 | ||
| Flexural modulus (MPa) | 256.06 | 535.97 | 578.28 | 659.98 | 708.43 | 895.49 | ||
| Flexural modulus loss (%) | 38.09 | 18.00 | 15.00 | 14.00 | 11.00 | 9.00 | ||
| Tensile properties | Before UV exposure | Tensile strength (MPa) | 5.02 | 7.66 | 7.89 | 8.04 | 8.18 | 10.29 |
| After UV exposure | Tensile strength (MPa) | 3.72 | 6.51 | 6.79 | 7.08 | 7.2 | 9.36 | |
| Tensile strength loss (%) | 25.90 | 15.01 | 13.94 | 11.94 | 11.98 | 9.04 | ||
| Impact properties | Before UV exposure | Impact (KJ/m2) | 0.53 | 1.86 | 1.92 | 2.25 | 3.03 | 3.28 |
| After UV exposure | Impact (KJ/m2) | 0.46 | 1.69 | 1.73 | 2 | 2.8 | 3.12 | |
| Impact loss (%) | 13.21 | 9.14 | 9.90 | 11.11 | 7.59 | 4.88 | ||