| Literature DB >> 28772803 |
Jeong Gook Jang1, Sol Moi Park2, Haeng Ki Lee3.
Abstract
The present study investigates the retention mechanisms of cesium and strontium for alkali-activated cements. Retention mechanisms such as adsorption and precipitation were examined in light of chemical interactions. Batch adsorption experiments and multi-technical characterizations by using X-ray diffraction, zeta potential measurements, and the N₂ gas adsorption/desorption methods were conducted for this purpose. Strontium was found to crystalize in alkali-activated cements, while no cesium-bearing crystalline phases were detected. The adsorption kinetics of alkali-activated cements having relatively high adsorption capacities were compatible with pseudo-second-order kinetic model, thereby suggesting that it is governed by complex multistep adsorption. The results provide new insight, demonstrating that characteristics of aluminosilicate gel with a highly negatively charged surface and high micropore surface area facilitated more effective immobilization of cesium and strontium in comparison with calcium silicate hydrates.Entities:
Keywords: adsorption kinetics; alkali-activated cements; cesium; gel; immobilization; strontium
Year: 2017 PMID: 28772803 PMCID: PMC5506979 DOI: 10.3390/ma10040447
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Chemical compositions of the raw materials used in this study.
| (wt %) | Fly Ash | Slag | Portland Cement |
|---|---|---|---|
| CaO | 5.3 | 47.7 | 62.5 |
| SiO2 | 51.5 | 32.4 | 21.0 |
| Al2O3 | 22.0 | 11.5 | 5.9 |
| Fe2O3 | 10.8 | 0.6 | 3.2 |
| MgO | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.8 |
| K2O | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.9 |
| TiO2 | 1.6 | 0.5 | - |
| SO3 | 0.7 | 2.7 | 2.1 |
Mix design of the samples.
| Sample Code | Mix Design (Relative Weight Proportion) | Initial Curing (for 24 h) |
|---|---|---|
| PC | Portland cement (1.0) + Water (0.5) | 20 °C |
| S0 | Fly ash (1.0) + 9 M NaOH (0.25) + Sodium silicate (0.25) | 60 °C |
| S1 | Fly ash (0.9) + Slag (0.1) + 4 M NaOH (0.33) + Sodium silicate (0.17) | 20 °C |
| S3 | Fly ash (0.7) + Slag (0.3) + 4 M NaOH (0.33) + Sodium silicate (0.17) | 20 °C |
| S5 | Fly ash (0.5) + Slag (0.3) + 4 M NaOH (0.33) + Sodium silicate (0.17) | 20 °C |
Figure 1The precipitates formed in the binder matrix incorporating cesium and strontium: (a) microscope images and (b) X-ray diffraction peak patterns of the precipitates.
Figure 2The influence of the incorporated cesium and strontium on the crystalline structures of the binder.
Figure 3Adsorption capacities and kinetic modelings of (a) cesium and (b) strontium adsorptions on various binder types.
Parameters of kinetic models of cesium adsorptions on various binder types.
| Binder | Experimental | Pseudo-First-Order Model | Pseudo-Second-Order Model | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC | 18.65 | 0.510 | 18.44 | 0.994 | 0.040 | 19.09 | 0.976 |
| S0 | 59.57 | 2.230 | 58.80 | 0.888 | 0.127 | 59.52 | 0.997 |
| S1 | 35.61 | 1.492 | 34.41 | 0.887 | 0.093 | 35.23 | 0.988 |
| S3 | 31.21 | 0.861 | 30.50 | 0.911 | 0.054 | 31.32 | 0.998 |
| S5 | 29.22 | 0.563 | 28.94 | 0.999 | 0.029 | 29.87 | 0.970 |
Parameters of kinetic models of strontium adsorptions on various binder types.
| Binder | Experimental | Pseudo-First-Order Model | Pseudo-Second-Order Model | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC | 33.44 | 0.843 | 32.92 | 0.996 | 0.044 | 33.80 | 0.935 |
| S0 | 54.52 | 1.662 | 53.38 | 0.887 | 0.073 | 54.49 | 0.997 |
| S1 | 45.59 | 2.048 | 44.67 | 0.872 | 0.135 | 45.33 | 0.991 |
| S3 | 44.65 | 2.119 | 44.10 | 0.836 | 0.183 | 44.61 | 0.994 |
| S5 | 43.64 | 2.030 | 43.56 | 0.998 | 0.154 | 44.03 | 0.914 |
Figure 4Compilation of K values for (a) cesium and (b) strontium in this study and values from the literature.
Figure 5Zeta potential values of powdered binders before and after the adsorption tests.
Figure 6Pore size distribution of powdered binders measured by a BJH N2 desorption method.
Pore characteristics of powdered binders.
| Binder | PC | S0 | S1 | S3 | S5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BET surface area (m2/g) | 36.2 | 77.6 | 55.6 | 37.8 | 12.72 |
| BJH cumulative volume of pores (cm3/g) | 0.089 | 0.138 | 0.116 | 0.071 | 0.037 |
| BJH average pore diameter (nm) | 9.8 | 5.2 | 5.9 | 5.4 | 8.0 |