| Literature DB >> 28772569 |
Fuchang Peng1,2, Honglin Gao3, Genlin Zhang4, Zhongqi Zhu5, Jin Zhang6, Qingju Liu7.
Abstract
Mixed phase TiO₂ nanoparEntities:
Keywords: co-doped TiO2; mixed phase TiO2; photocatalytic activity; sol-gel; synergistic effects
Year: 2017 PMID: 28772569 PMCID: PMC5459127 DOI: 10.3390/ma10020209
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1XRD patterns of the pure TiO2, C-TiO2, Sm-TiO2, and Sm-C-TiO2 samples calcined at 500 °C.
XRD results of the different TiO2 samples calcined at 500 °C.
| Samples | Anatase | Crystal Size | Interplanar Spacing | Average Grain Size (nm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| d-(101) Å | d-(110) Å | |||||
| Pure TiO2 | 12.6 | 29.8 | 31.8 | 3.5145 | 3.2478 | 174 |
| C-TiO2 | 4.0 | 31.7 | 30.5 | 3.5148 | 3.2475 | 143 |
| Sm-TiO2 | 74.3 | 12.1 | 22.0 | 3.5175 | 3.2525 | 58 |
| Sm-C-TiO2 | 70.0 | 11.3 | 25.9 | 3.5092 | 3.2550 | 78 |
a Anatase/Rutile proportions were calculated from Spurr and Myers’ equation: WR/WA = 1.22(IR/IA) − 0.025 based on the X-ray diffraction patterns [29]. WR/WA stands for the ratio of rutile and anatase phases. IR refers to the intensity of the rutile (110) diffraction line, and IA refers to the intensity of the anatase (101) diffraction line. The infinity symbol is used for the pure anatase phase or pure rutile phase calculation.
Figure 2FT-IR spectra of Sm-C-TiO2, C-TiO2, Sm-TiO2, and TiO2 samples.
Figure 3Bright field TEM (a); HRTEM (b); and SEM image (c) of Sm-C-TiO2 with the corresponding elemental distribution maps (d–f). The inset shown in (a) is the diffraction pattern of the particles.
Figure 4XPS spectra for the Sm-C-TiO2. (a) Ti 2p; (b) C 1s; (c) Sm 3d; (d) O 1s.
Figure 5(a) Diffusive reflectance UV-Visible absorption profiles of the samples of pure TiO2, C-TiO2, Sm-TiO2, and Sm-C-TiO2, inset shows the corresponding Tauc plots as well as the optical band gap values for the undoped and doped TiO2. The time course (b) and kinetic curves (c) of MB photodegradation over different samples under visible light irradiation.(P25; pure TiO2; Sm-TiO2; C-TiO2; Sm-C-TiO2). (d) Cycling runs in photocatalytic degradation of MB in the presence of Sm-C-TiO2 photocatalysts under visible light irradiation.
Figure 6PL spectra of the samples. (a) P25; (b) pure TiO2; (c) Sm-TiO2; (d) C-TiO2; (e) Sm-C-TiO2.
Figure 7Photocatalytic degradation of MB over Sm-C-TiO2 samples under visible light irradiation with the addition of different scavengers: MB blank, BQ, TBA, AO, and AgNO3.
Figure 8Schematic illustration for the twin synergistic effects of Sm-C co-doping and the mixed phase TiO2. In our experiment, the band gap of rutile TiO2 may show the band gap of TiO2 as the 3.05 eV, the band gap of C-TiO2, Sm-TiO2, and Sm-C-TiO2 are 3.03 eV, 2.99 eV, and 2.97 eV, respectively, indicating that the C and Sm form impurity energy levels.