Literature DB >> 28772188

Spatial representation of magnitude in gorillas and orangutans.

Regina Paxton Gazes1, Rachel F L Diamond2, Jasmine M Hope3, Damien Caillaud4, Tara S Stoinski5, Robert R Hampton2.   

Abstract

Humans mentally represent magnitudes spatially; we respond faster to one side of space when processing small quantities and to the other side of space when processing large quantities. We determined whether spatial representation of magnitude is a fundamental feature of primate cognition by testing for such space-magnitude correspondence in gorillas and orangutans. Subjects picked the larger quantity in a pair of dot arrays in one condition, and the smaller in another. Response latencies to the left and right sides of the screen were compared across the magnitude range. Apes showed evidence of spatial representation of magnitude. While all subjects did not adopt the same orientation, apes showed consistent tendencies for spatial representations within individuals and systematically reversed these orientations in response to reversal of the task instruction. Results suggest that spatial representation of magnitude is phylogenetically ancient and that consistency in the orientation of these representations in humans is likely culturally mediated.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ape; Pongo; SNARC; Space

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28772188     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  10 in total

1.  Limited evidence of number-space mapping in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Kristin French; Travis R Smith; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 2.  On the genesis of spatial-numerical associations: Evolutionary and cultural factors co-construct the mental number line.

Authors:  Elizabeth Y Toomarian; Edward M Hubbard
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Non-symbolic and symbolic number lines are dissociated.

Authors:  Xingcheng He; Pengpeng Guo; Shuyi Li; Xiaojing Shen; Xinlin Zhou
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2021-03-22

4.  The future is in front, to the right, or below: Development of spatial representations of time in three dimensions.

Authors:  Ariel Starr; Mahesh Srinivasan
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2021-01-21

5.  Greater dependence on working memory and restricted familiarity in orangutans compared with rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Ryan J Brady; Jennifer M Mickelberg; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.699

6.  Numerical magnitude, rather than individual bias, explains spatial numerical association in newborn chicks.

Authors:  Rosa Rugani; Giorgio Vallortigara; Konstantinos Priftis; Lucia Regolin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Cultural factors weaken but do not reverse left-to-right spatial biases in numerosity processing: Data from Arabic and English monoliterates and Arabic-English biliterates.

Authors:  Dominique Lopiccolo; Charles B Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Relative numerical middle in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Rosa Rugani; Michael L Platt; Zhaoying Chen; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  The Developing Mental Number Line: Does Its Directionality Relate to 5- to 7-Year-Old Children's Mathematical Abilities?

Authors:  Lauren S Aulet; Stella F Lourenco
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-06

10.  Perceiving numerosity does not cause automatic shifts of spatial attention.

Authors:  Michele Pellegrino; Mario Pinto; Fabio Marson; Stefano Lasaponara; Fabrizio Doricchi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.