Literature DB >> 28772164

Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for evaluating new medicines in Health Technology Assessment and beyond: The Advance Value Framework.

Aris Angelis1, Panos Kanavos2.   

Abstract

Escalating drug prices have catalysed the generation of numerous "value frameworks" with the aim of informing payers, clinicians and patients on the assessment and appraisal process of new medicines for the purpose of coverage and treatment selection decisions. Although this is an important step towards a more inclusive Value Based Assessment (VBA) approach, aspects of these frameworks are based on weak methodologies and could potentially result in misleading recommendations or decisions. In this paper, a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methodological process, based on Multi Attribute Value Theory (MAVT), is adopted for building a multi-criteria evaluation model. A five-stage model-building process is followed, using a top-down "value-focused thinking" approach, involving literature reviews and expert consultations. A generic value tree is structured capturing decision-makers' concerns for assessing the value of new medicines in the context of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and in alignment with decision theory. The resulting value tree (Advance Value Tree) consists of three levels of criteria (top level criteria clusters, mid-level criteria, bottom level sub-criteria or attributes) relating to five key domains that can be explicitly measured and assessed: (a) burden of disease, (b) therapeutic impact, (c) safety profile (d) innovation level and (e) socioeconomic impact. A number of MAVT modelling techniques are introduced for operationalising (i.e. estimating) the model, for scoring the alternative treatment options, assigning relative weights of importance to the criteria, and combining scores and weights. Overall, the combination of these MCDA modelling techniques for the elicitation and construction of value preferences across the generic value tree provides a new value framework (Advance Value Framework) enabling the comprehensive measurement of value in a structured and transparent way. Given its flexibility to meet diverse requirements and become readily adaptable across different settings, the Advance Value Framework could be offered as a decision-support tool for evaluators and payers to aid coverage and reimbursement of new medicines.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision theory; European health policy; Health Technology Assessment; Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis; New medicines; Pharmaceuticals; Value Based Assessment; Value framework

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28772164     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.06.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  28 in total

1.  A multi-criteria sustainability assessment framework: development and application in comparing two food waste management options using a UK region as a case study.

Authors:  Eleni Iacovidou; Nikolaos Voulvoulis
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Recalibrating Health Technology Assessment Methods for Cell and Gene Therapies.

Authors:  Aris Angelis; Huseyin Naci; Allan Hackshaw
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Incorporating Quantitative Patient Preference Data into Healthcare Decision Making Processes: Is HTA Falling Behind?

Authors:  David John Mott
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Could or Should We Use MCDA in the French HTA Process?

Authors:  Salah Ghabri; Jean-Michel Josselin; Benoît Le Maux
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  A systematic review of moral reasons on orphan drug reimbursement.

Authors:  Bettina M Zimmermann; Johanna Eichinger; Matthias R Baumgartner
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.123

6.  A New Decision Model Approach for Health Technology Assessment and A Case Study for Dialysis Alternatives in Turkey.

Authors:  Necla Öztürk; Hakan Tozan; Özalp Vayvay
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Artificial Intelligence and Health Technology Assessment: Anticipating a New Level of Complexity.

Authors:  Hassane Alami; Pascale Lehoux; Yannick Auclair; Michèle de Guise; Marie-Pierre Gagnon; James Shaw; Denis Roy; Richard Fleet; Mohamed Ali Ag Ahmed; Jean-Paul Fortin
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Multiple criteria decision analysis in the context of health technology assessment: a simulation exercise on metastatic colorectal cancer with multiple stakeholders in the English setting.

Authors:  Aris Angelis; Gilberto Montibeller; Daniel Hochhauser; Panos Kanavos
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Models in Health Technology Assessment of Orphan Drugs-a Systematic Literature Review. Next Steps in Methodology Development?

Authors:  Aleksandra Baran-Kooiker; Marcin Czech; Coen Kooiker
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-10-15

10.  Early Health Technology Assessment during Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Drug Development: A Two-Round, Cross-Country, Multicriteria Decision Analysis.

Authors:  Aris Angelis; Mark Thursz; Vlad Ratziu; Alastair O'Brien; Lawrence Serfaty; Ali Canbay; Ingolf Schiefke; Joao Bana E Costa; Pascal Lecomte; Panos Kanavos
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.