OBJECTIVE: To determine if varus thrust, a bowing out of the knee during gait (i.e., the first appearance or worsening of varus alignment during stance), is associated with incident and progressive knee osteoarthritis (OA), we undertook an Osteoarthritis Initiative ancillary study. We further considered hypothesized associations adjusted for static alignment, anticipating some attenuation. METHODS: Gait was observed for the presence of thrust by 1 of 2-3 examiners per study site at 4 sites. In eligible knees, incident OA was defined as subsequent incident Kellgren/Lawrence grade ≥2, whole- and partial-grade medial joint space narrowing (JSN), and annualized loss of joint space width (JSW); progression was defined as medial JSN and JSW loss. Outcome measures were assessed for up to 7 years of follow-up. Analyses were knee-level, using multivariable logistic and linear regression with generalized estimating equations to account for between-limb correlation. RESULTS: The incident OA sample included 4,187 knees (2,610 persons); the progression sample included 3,421 knees (2,284 persons). In knees with OA, thrust was associated with progression as assessed by each outcome measure, with adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, and pain on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale. In knees without OA, varus thrust was not associated with incident OA or other outcomes. After adjustment for alignment, the thrust-progression association was attenuated, but an independent association persisted for partial-grade JSN and JSW loss outcome models. WOMAC pain and alignment were consistently associated with all outcome measures. Within the stratum of varus knees, thrust was associated with an increased risk of progression. CONCLUSION: Varus thrust visualized during gait is associated with knee OA progression and should be a target of intervention development.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if varus thrust, a bowing out of the knee during gait (i.e., the first appearance or worsening of varus alignment during stance), is associated with incident and progressive knee osteoarthritis (OA), we undertook an Osteoarthritis Initiative ancillary study. We further considered hypothesized associations adjusted for static alignment, anticipating some attenuation. METHODS: Gait was observed for the presence of thrust by 1 of 2-3 examiners per study site at 4 sites. In eligible knees, incident OA was defined as subsequent incident Kellgren/Lawrence grade ≥2, whole- and partial-grade medial joint space narrowing (JSN), and annualized loss of joint space width (JSW); progression was defined as medial JSN and JSW loss. Outcome measures were assessed for up to 7 years of follow-up. Analyses were knee-level, using multivariable logistic and linear regression with generalized estimating equations to account for between-limb correlation. RESULTS: The incident OA sample included 4,187 knees (2,610 persons); the progression sample included 3,421 knees (2,284 persons). In knees with OA, thrust was associated with progression as assessed by each outcome measure, with adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, and pain on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale. In knees without OA, varus thrust was not associated with incident OA or other outcomes. After adjustment for alignment, the thrust-progression association was attenuated, but an independent association persisted for partial-grade JSN and JSW loss outcome models. WOMAC pain and alignment were consistently associated with all outcome measures. Within the stratum of varus knees, thrust was associated with an increased risk of progression. CONCLUSION: Varus thrust visualized during gait is associated with knee OA progression and should be a target of intervention development.
Authors: Armaghan Mahmoudian; Jaap H van Dieen; Sjoerd M Bruijn; Isabel Ac Baert; Gert S Faber; Frank P Luyten; Sabine Mp Verschueren Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2016-10-08 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Kim L Bennell; Fiona Dobson; Ewa M Roos; Søren T Skou; Paul Hodges; Tim V Wrigley; Mary Kyriakides; Ben Metcalf; Michael A Hunt; Rana S Hinman Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: A E Wink; K D Gross; C A Brown; A Guermazi; F Roemer; J Niu; J Torner; C E Lewis; M C Nevitt; I Tolstykh; L Sharma; D T Felson Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2017-01-16 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Nasim Foroughi; Richard M Smith; Angela K Lange; Michael K Baker; Maria A Fiatarone Singh; Benedicte Vanwanseele Journal: Knee Date: 2009-11-05 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: A H Chang; J S Chmiel; K C Moisio; O Almagor; Y Zhang; S Cahue; L Sharma Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2013-08-12 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: L-C Tsai; E S Cooper; K M Hetzendorfer; G L Warren; Y-H Chang; N J Willett Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Enzo S Mameri; Suhas P Dasari; Luc M Fortier; Fernando Gómez Verdejo; Safa Gursoy; Adam B Yanke; Jorge Chahla Journal: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med Date: 2022-08-10
Authors: Kerry E Costello; Samantha Eigenbrot; Alex Geronimo; Ali Guermazi; David T Felson; Jim Richards; Deepak Kumar Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Alexandra E Wink; K Douglas Gross; Carrie A Brown; Cora E Lewis; James Torner; Michael C Nevitt; Irina Tolstykh; Leena Sharma; David T Felson Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Grace H Lo; Uzoh E Ikpeama; Jeffrey B Driban; Andrea M Kriska; Timothy E McAlindon; Nancy J Petersen; Kristi L Storti; Charles B Eaton; Marc C Hochberg; Rebecca D Jackson; C Kent Kwoh; Michael C Nevitt; Maria E Suarez-Almazor Journal: PM R Date: 2019-12-04 Impact factor: 2.298