INTRODUCTION: The analgesic metamizole (dipyrone) is not recommended during pregnancy due to limited experience. In several countries, metamizole has no market authorization because of agranulocytosis as a rare but severe adverse effect. However, in others, metamizole is available and widely used as a pain reliever, and its use occurs also during pregnancy, often followed by fears of potential teratogenic risk. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study compared pregnancy outcomes of 446 women exposed with metamizole in the first trimester with a randomly selected control cohort comprising 887 women not exposed to metamizole. Relevant data were obtained via structured questionnaires applied during the first trimester and 2 months after the expected date of birth between January 2000 and December 2015. RESULTS: The rate of major birth defects (7/373, 1.9%) was not increased in the metamizole cohort (OR adjusted 1.15, 95% CI 0.4-3.5). The cumulative incidences for spontaneous abortions did not reveal a significant difference between the exposed (12.2%, 32/446) and comparison cohort (19.4%, 77/887) (HR adjusted 0.72, 95% CI 0.5-1.1). Elective terminations of pregnancy (ETOP), mostly for "social" reasons, were more frequent in the metamizole (12.5%, 45/446) than in the comparison cohort (9.4%, 50/887; HR adjusted 1.48, 95% CI 0.98-2.2). CONCLUSIONS: Metamizole exposure in the first trimester does not seem to bear a substantial teratogenic risk. Our study results support reassurance in those instances where metamizole has been used during an unrecognized pregnancy or where its use appears indispensable.
INTRODUCTION: The analgesic metamizole (dipyrone) is not recommended during pregnancy due to limited experience. In several countries, metamizole has no market authorization because of agranulocytosis as a rare but severe adverse effect. However, in others, metamizole is available and widely used as a pain reliever, and its use occurs also during pregnancy, often followed by fears of potential teratogenic risk. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study compared pregnancy outcomes of 446 women exposed with metamizole in the first trimester with a randomly selected control cohort comprising 887 women not exposed to metamizole. Relevant data were obtained via structured questionnaires applied during the first trimester and 2 months after the expected date of birth between January 2000 and December 2015. RESULTS: The rate of major birth defects (7/373, 1.9%) was not increased in the metamizole cohort (OR adjusted 1.15, 95% CI 0.4-3.5). The cumulative incidences for spontaneous abortions did not reveal a significant difference between the exposed (12.2%, 32/446) and comparison cohort (19.4%, 77/887) (HR adjusted 0.72, 95% CI 0.5-1.1). Elective terminations of pregnancy (ETOP), mostly for "social" reasons, were more frequent in the metamizole (12.5%, 45/446) than in the comparison cohort (9.4%, 50/887; HR adjusted 1.48, 95% CI 0.98-2.2). CONCLUSIONS:Metamizole exposure in the first trimester does not seem to bear a substantial teratogenic risk. Our study results support reassurance in those instances where metamizole has been used during an unrecognized pregnancy or where its use appears indispensable.
Authors: Alana Cavadino; Lovisa Sandberg; Inger Öhman; Tomas Bergvall; Kristina Star; Helen Dolk; Maria Loane; Marie-Claude Addor; Ingeborg Barisic; Clara Cavero-Carbonell; Ester Garne; Miriam Gatt; Babak Khoshnood; Kari Klungsøyr; Anna Latos-Bielenska; Nathalie Lelong; Reneé Lutke; Anna Materna-Kiryluk; Vera Nelen; Amanda Nevill; Mary O'Mahony; Olatz Mokoroa; Anna Pierini; Hanitra Randrianaivo; Anke Rissmann; David Tucker; Awi Wiesel; Lyubov Yevtushok; Joan K Morris Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2021-05-09 Impact factor: 5.606