Allison K Ikeda1, Anthony A Prince2, Jenny X Chen2, Judith E C Lieu3, Jennifer J Shin2. 1. School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A. 2. Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A. 3. Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the potential association of macrolide antibiotics with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and which agents and dosage may be related. To evaluate whether an optimal treatment exists for reversing SNHL that occurs after macrolide therapy. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of the literature. METHODS: Computerized (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library) and manual searches were performed to identify human studies of all ages (patients) who received macrolides (intervention, with or without control) and documented SNHL (outcome). All study designs were assessed. Extracted data included macrolide regimen details, as well as the timing, severity, and reversibility of SNHL with drug cessation alone or with additional medical intervention. Study designs and the associated risk of bias were assessed. RESULTS: The 44 publications (3 prospective, 41 retrospective) that met these criteria described 78 cases of audiometrically confirmed SNHL. SNHL was associated with oral and intravenous macrolide administration at standard and elevated doses. SNHL was irreversible in six cases, despite macrolide cessation (n = 5) and oral steroid treatment (n = 1). Irreversible SNHL was observed following 2 to 3 days of exposure. SNHL was reversible with macrolide cessation alone in 70 cases. In two cases, macrolide cessation coupled with oral steroid administration restored hearing. Reversible cases improved within hours to days. Nine studies also described 42 cases of subjective patient-reported hearing loss. Limitations in the data arose from study design, related comorbidities, and concomitant drug administration. CONCLUSION: SNHL may follow macrolide exposure, even at standard oral doses. Further research is needed to understand the incidence, prevalence, and biological mechanism of its ototoxicity. Laryngoscope, 128:228-236, 2018.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the potential association of macrolide antibiotics with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and which agents and dosage may be related. To evaluate whether an optimal treatment exists for reversing SNHL that occurs after macrolide therapy. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of the literature. METHODS: Computerized (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library) and manual searches were performed to identify human studies of all ages (patients) who received macrolides (intervention, with or without control) and documented SNHL (outcome). All study designs were assessed. Extracted data included macrolide regimen details, as well as the timing, severity, and reversibility of SNHL with drug cessation alone or with additional medical intervention. Study designs and the associated risk of bias were assessed. RESULTS: The 44 publications (3 prospective, 41 retrospective) that met these criteria described 78 cases of audiometrically confirmed SNHL. SNHL was associated with oral and intravenous macrolide administration at standard and elevated doses. SNHL was irreversible in six cases, despite macrolide cessation (n = 5) and oral steroid treatment (n = 1). Irreversible SNHL was observed following 2 to 3 days of exposure. SNHL was reversible with macrolide cessation alone in 70 cases. In two cases, macrolide cessation coupled with oral steroid administration restored hearing. Reversible cases improved within hours to days. Nine studies also described 42 cases of subjective patient-reported hearing loss. Limitations in the data arose from study design, related comorbidities, and concomitant drug administration. CONCLUSION: SNHL may follow macrolide exposure, even at standard oral doses. Further research is needed to understand the incidence, prevalence, and biological mechanism of its ototoxicity. Laryngoscope, 128:228-236, 2018.
Authors: Matt Mason; Eric Gregory; Keith Foster; Megan Klatt; Sara Zoubek; Albert J Eid Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2022-06-15 Impact factor: 4.423
Authors: Adam J Kimple; Brent A Senior; Edward T Naureckas; David A Gudis; Ted Meyer; Sarah E Hempstead; Helaine E Resnick; Dana Albon; Wayne Barfield; Margo McKenna Benoit; Daniel M Beswick; Eliza Callard; Shelagh Cofer; Veronica Downer; E Claire Elson; Angela Garinis; Ashleigh Halderman; Lisa Hamburger; Meagan Helmick; Michael McCown; Cameron J McKinzie; Hanna Phan; Kenneth Rodriguez; Ronald C Rubenstein; Ashley Severin; Gopi Shah; Ambika Shenoy; Brittney Sprouse; Frank Virgin; Bradford A Woodworth; Stella E Lee Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2022-02-22 Impact factor: 5.426
Authors: Virginia Fancello; Stavros Hatzopoulos; Virginia Corazzi; Chiara Bianchini; Magdalena B Skarżyńska; Stefano Pelucchi; Piotr Henryk Skarżyński; Andrea Ciorba Journal: Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol Date: 2021 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 3.219
Authors: Anna Vanoverschelde; Berthe C Oosterloo; Nelly F Ly; M Arfan Ikram; André Goedegebure; Bruno H Stricker; Lies Lahousse Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2021-09-15 Impact factor: 5.790