Literature DB >> 28770462

Predictive value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with acute type B aortic intramural hematoma.

Fan Yang1, Jianfang Luo2, Qingyi Hou3, Nianjin Xie1, Zhiqiang Nie4, Wenhui Huang1, Yuan Liu1, Yingling Zhou1, Jiyan Chen1, Qingshan Geng1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical course and predictors of adverse aortic events (AAE) in patients with acute Stanford type B intramural hematoma (IMH) remain controversial. This study aimed to investigate whether 18F-FDG PET/CT can predict risk in patients with acute type B IMH. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This study included 34 patients with acute type B IMH who underwent PET/CT within 14 days from the onset of symptoms. The maximal standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of 18F-FDG uptake was significantly different between patients with or without AAE (4.3 ± 0.6 vs 3.7 ± 1.0, P = 0.020), but not the target to blood ratio (TBR, SUVmax divided by SUV in the superior vena cava) (1.6 ± 0.2 vs 1.5 ± 0.5, P = 0.064). In patients with initial ulcer-like projection (ULP), a blood-filled pouch protruding into the IMH, which was seen in 25 patients(74%), both the SUVmax and TBR were significantly higher in patients who developed AAE, (4.3 ± 0.6 vs 3.3 ± 0.5, P = 0.001; 1.6 ± 0.2 vs 1.4 ± 0.2, P = 0.01); the TBR >1.5, which is determined from receiver-operating-characteristic curve, had a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 80% in predicting AAE.
CONCLUSION: Patients with ULP and high 18F-FDG uptake were more likely to develop AAE and may require closer surveillance with serial imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG); PET/CT imaging; outcomes research; peripheral artery disease

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28770462     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-017-1014-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  34 in total

1.  Prognosis of aortic intramural hemorrhage compared with classic aortic dissection.

Authors:  H Shimizu; H Yoshino; H Udagawa; A Watanuki; K Yano; H Ide; K Sudo; K Ishikawa
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Analysis of predictive factors for progression of type B aortic intramural hematoma with computed tomography.

Authors:  Eijun Sueyoshi; Tatsuya Imada; Ichiro Sakamoto; Yohjiro Matsuoka; Kuniaki Hayashi
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Newly developed ulcer-like projection (ULP) in aortic intramural haematoma on follow-up CT: is it different from the ULP seen on the initial CT?

Authors:  Y M Jang; J B Seo; Y K Lee; E J Chae; S H Park; J-W Kang; T-H Lim
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Acute intramural hematoma of the aorta: a mystery in evolution.

Authors:  Arturo Evangelista; Debabrata Mukherjee; Rajendra H Mehta; Patrick T O'Gara; Rossella Fattori; Jeanna V Cooper; Dean E Smith; Jae K Oh; Stuart Hutchison; Udo Sechtem; Eric M Isselbacher; Christoph A Nienaber; Linda A Pape; Kim A Eagle
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-02-14       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Intramural hematoma of the aorta: predictors of progression to dissection and rupture.

Authors:  Yskert von Kodolitsch; Susanne K Csösz; Dietmar H Koschyk; Ilka Schalwat; Roger Loose; Matthias Karck; Christoph Dieckmann; Rossella Fattori; Axel Haverich; Jürgen Berger; Thomas Meinertz; Christoph A Nienaber
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-03-04       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  The value of [18F]FDG-PET in the diagnosis of large-vessel vasculitis and the assessment of activity and extent of disease.

Authors:  Martin A Walter; Ralph A Melzer; Christian Schindler; Jan Müller-Brand; Alan Tyndall; Egbert U Nitzsche
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-03-04       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Outcomes of medically treated patients with aortic intramural hematoma.

Authors:  Jae-Kwan Song; Hyun-Sook Kim; Jong-Min Song; Duk-Hyun Kang; Jong-Won Ha; Se-Joong Rim; Namsik Chung; Kee-Sik Kim; Seung Woo Park; Yong Jin Kim; Dae-Won Sohn
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Computed tomography evaluation of aortic remodeling after endovascular treatment for complicated ulcer-like projection in patients with type B aortic intramural hematoma.

Authors:  Eijun Sueyoshi; Hiroki Nagayama; Koji Hashizume; Kiyoyuki Eishi; Ichiro Sakamoto; Masataka Uetani
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Increased 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in abdominal aortic aneurysms in positron emission/computed tomography is associated with inflammation, aortic wall instability, and acute symptoms.

Authors:  Christian Reeps; Markus Essler; Jaroslav Pelisek; Stefan Seidl; Hans-Henning Eckstein; Bernd-Joachim Krause
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 10.  Intramural hematoma and penetrating ulcers: indications to endovascular treatment.

Authors:  H Eggebrecht; B Plicht; P Kahlert; R Erbel
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 7.069

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Role of PET/CT in the Evaluation of Aortic Disease.

Authors:  Jahae Kim; Ho-Chun Song
Journal:  Chonnam Med J       Date:  2018-09-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.