Masatoyo Nakajo1, Yoriko Kajiya2, Atsushi Tani3, Megumi Jinguji3, Masayuki Nakajo2, Masaki Kitazono4, Takashi Yoshiura3. 1. Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, 890-8544, Japan. toyo.nakajo@dolphin.ocn.ne.jp. 2. Department of Radiology, Nanpuh Hospital, 14-3 Nagata, Kagoshima, 892-8512, Japan. 3. Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, 890-8544, Japan. 4. Department of Surgery, Nanpuh Hospital, 14-3 Nagata, Kagoshima, 892-8512, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This retrospective study was done to examine whether the heterogeneity in primary tumor F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) and 18F-3'-fluoro-3'-deoxythymidine (18F-FLT) distribution can predict prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer who received surgery. METHODS: The enrolled 32 patients with colorectal cancer underwent both 18F-FDG- and 18F-FLT-PET/CT studies before surgery. Clinicopathological factors, stage, SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (SUV ≥ 2.5), total lesion glycolysis, total lesion proliferation and seven texture heterogeneity parameters (coefficient of variation, local parameters: entropy, homogeneity, and dissimilarity; and regional parameters: intensity variability [IV], size-zone variability [SZV], and zone percentage [ZP]) were obtained. Progression free survival (PFS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic significance was assessed by Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: Eight patients had eventually come to progression, and 24 patients were alive without progression during clinical follow-up [mean follow-up PFS; 55.9 months (range, 1-72)]. High stage (p = 0.004), high 18F-FDG-IV (p = 0.015), high 18F-FDG-SZV (p = 0.013) and high 18F-FLT-entropy (p = 0.015) were significant in predicting poor 5-year PFS. Other parameters did not predict the disease outcome. At bivariate analysis, disease event hazards ratios for 18F-FDG-IV and 18F-FDG-SZV remained significant when adjusted for stage and 18F-FLT-entropy (18F-FDG-IV; p = 0.004 [adjusted for stage], 0.007 [adjusted for 18F-FLT-entropy]; 18F-FDG-SZV; p = 0.028 [adjusted for stage], 0.040 [adjusted for 18F-FLT-entropy]). CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET heterogeneity parameters, IV and SZV, have a potential to be strong prognostic factors to predict PFS of patients with surgically resected colorectal cancer and are more useful than 18F-FLT-PET/CT heterogeneity parameters.
PURPOSE: This retrospective study was done to examine whether the heterogeneity in primary tumor F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) and 18F-3'-fluoro-3'-deoxythymidine (18F-FLT) distribution can predict prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer who received surgery. METHODS: The enrolled 32 patients with colorectal cancer underwent both 18F-FDG- and 18F-FLT-PET/CT studies before surgery. Clinicopathological factors, stage, SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (SUV ≥ 2.5), total lesion glycolysis, total lesion proliferation and seven texture heterogeneity parameters (coefficient of variation, local parameters: entropy, homogeneity, and dissimilarity; and regional parameters: intensity variability [IV], size-zone variability [SZV], and zone percentage [ZP]) were obtained. Progression free survival (PFS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic significance was assessed by Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: Eight patients had eventually come to progression, and 24 patients were alive without progression during clinical follow-up [mean follow-up PFS; 55.9 months (range, 1-72)]. High stage (p = 0.004), high 18F-FDG-IV (p = 0.015), high 18F-FDG-SZV (p = 0.013) and high 18F-FLT-entropy (p = 0.015) were significant in predicting poor 5-year PFS. Other parameters did not predict the disease outcome. At bivariate analysis, disease event hazards ratios for 18F-FDG-IV and 18F-FDG-SZV remained significant when adjusted for stage and 18F-FLT-entropy (18F-FDG-IV; p = 0.004 [adjusted for stage], 0.007 [adjusted for 18F-FLT-entropy]; 18F-FDG-SZV; p = 0.028 [adjusted for stage], 0.040 [adjusted for 18F-FLT-entropy]). CONCLUSION:18F-FDG PET heterogeneity parameters, IV and SZV, have a potential to be strong prognostic factors to predict PFS of patients with surgically resected colorectal cancer and are more useful than 18F-FLT-PET/CT heterogeneity parameters.
Authors: Betty S Pio; Cecilia K Park; Richard Pietras; Wei-Ann Hsueh; Nagichettiar Satyamurthy; Mark D Pegram; Johannes Czernin; Michael E Phelps; Daniel H S Silverman Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2006 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Yong Sang Hong; Hye Ok Kim; Kyu-pyo Kim; Jae-Lyun Lee; Hwa Jung Kim; Seung Jin Lee; Sang Ju Lee; Seung Jun Oh; Jae Seung Kim; Jin-Sook Ryu; Dae Hyuk Moon; Tae Won Kim Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2013-06-26 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Andrei Pugachev; Shutian Ruan; Sean Carlin; Steven M Larson; Jose Campa; C Clifton Ling; John L Humm Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-06-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Gary J R Cook; Connie Yip; Muhammad Siddique; Vicky Goh; Sugama Chicklore; Arunabha Roy; Paul Marsden; Shahreen Ahmad; David Landau Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-11-30 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Paula Martin-Gonzalez; Estibaliz Gomez de Mariscal; M Elena Martino; Pedro M Gordaliza; Isabel Peligros; Jose Luis Carreras; Felipe A Calvo; Javier Pascau; Manuel Desco; Arrate Muñoz-Barrutia Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-11-30 Impact factor: 3.240