| Literature DB >> 28770234 |
Norman E Buroker1, Xue-Han Ning1,2, Zhao-Nian Zhou3, Kui Li4, Wei-Jun Cen4, Xiu-Feng Wu3, Wei-Zhong Zhu5, C Ronald Scott1, Shi-Han Chen1.
Abstract
Chronic mountain sickness (CMS) is estimated at 1.2% in Tibetans living at the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Eighteen single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from nine nuclear genes that have an association with CMS in Tibetans have been analyzed by using pairwise linkage disequilibrium (LD). The SNPs included are the angiotensin-converting enzyme (rs4340), the angiotensinogen (rs699), and the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AGTR1) (rs5186) from the renin-angiotensin system. A low-density lipoprotein apolipoprotein B (rs693) SNP was also included. From the hypoxia-inducible factor oxygen signaling pathway, the endothetal Per-Arnt-Sim domain protein 1 (EPAS1) and the egl nine homolog 1 (ENGL1) (rs480902) SNPs were included in the study. SNPs from the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathway included are the v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 3 (rs4590656 and rs2291409), the endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase 3 (rs1007311 and rs1799983), and the (VEGFA) (rs699947, rs34357231, rs79469752, rs13207351, rs28357093, rs1570360, rs2010963, and rs3025039). An increase in LD occurred in 40 pairwise comparisons, whereas a decrease in LD was found in 55 pairwise comparisons between the controls and CMS patients. These changes were found to occur within and between signaling pathways, which suggests that there is an interaction between SNP alleles from different areas of the genome that affect CMS.Entities:
Keywords: HAS; HIF; Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau; RAS; VEGF; miRNA; pathways
Year: 2017 PMID: 28770234 PMCID: PMC5529112 DOI: 10.2147/HP.S117967
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hypoxia (Auckl) ISSN: 2324-1128
Genes and their SNPs that have been found to be associated with chronic mountain sickness
| Protein and gene symbol | Chromosome | SNP | SNP location | Mutation | LD identity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angiotensin I-converting enzyme ( | 17q23.3 | rs4340 | Intron 16 | 288bp Indel/(ALU) | ACE |
| Angiotensinogen ( | 1q43.2 | rs699 | Exon 1 | c.803T>C, p. Met268Thr | AGT |
| Angiotensin II receptor, type 1 ( | 3q24 | rs5186 | 3′UTR | c.*86A>C | AGTR1 |
| v-Akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 3 ( | 1q44 | rs4590656 | Intron 1 | c.46+3654C>T | AKT3-45 |
| v-Akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 3 ( | rs2291409 | Intron 8 | c.819+4031G>A | AKT3-22 | |
| Apolipoprotein B ( | 2p24.1 | rs693 | Exon 26 | c.7545C>T, p.Thr2515Thr | APOB |
| Egl-9 family hypoxia-inducible factor 1 ( | 1q42.2 | rs480902 | Intron 1 | c.892-21782T>C | EGLN1-48 |
| Endothelial PAS domain protein 1 ( | 2p21 | unknown | Intron 5 | c.657-5C>G | EPAS1 |
| Nitric oxide synthase 3 ( | 7q36.1 | rs1007311 | Intron 6 | c.817-26A>G | eNOS3-10 |
| Nitric oxide synthase 3 ( | rs1799983 | Exon 7 | c.894T>G, p.Asp298Glu | eNOS3-17 | |
| Vascular endothelial growth factor A ( | 6p21.1 | rs699947 | (−)2576 TSS | c.-2576C>A | VEGFA-69 |
| Vascular endothelial growth factor A ( | rs34357231 | (−)2550 TSS | c.-2550-2568D>I | VEGFA-34 | |
| Vascular endothelial growth factor A ( | rs79469752 | (−)1203 TSS | c.-663C>T | VEGFA-79 | |
| Vascular endothelial growth factor A ( | rs13207351 | (−)1190 TSS | c.-650A>G | VEGFA-13 | |
| Vascular endothelial growth factor A ( | rs28357093 | (−)1179 TSS | c.-639A>C | VEGFA-28 | |
| Vascular endothelial growth factor A ( | rs1570360 | (−)1154 TSS | c.-614A>G | VEGFA-15 | |
| Vascular endothelial growth factor A ( | rs2010963 | (−)634 TSS | c.-634C>G | VEGFA-20 | |
| Vascular endothelial growth factor A ( | rs3025039 | 3′UTR | c.*237C>T | VEGFA-30 |
Notes: Location of gene chromosome, SNP location in the gene, and the resulting genetic mutation as well as the LD identity using in the analysis are listed.
Abbreviations: LD, linkage disequilibrium; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; TSS, transcriptional start site.
Figure 1Pairwise LD for 18 SNPs in the non-CMS Tibetan Chinese group (A) compared with the CMS Tibetan Chinese group (B). The degree of genetic linkage between the 18 SNPs in each study group is estimated as Lewontin’s coefficient [D’] where no color ([D’] = 0) indicates that LD is weak or nonexistent and the dark red ([D’] = 1) indicates that there exists strong pairwise linkage disequilibrium between SNPs. Blue bar indicates tagging SNP (rs699947).
Abbreviations: LD, linkage disequilibrium; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; CMS, chronic mountain sickness.
Changes in pairwise LD from Figure 1 between 18 SNPs in the CMS Tibetan Chinese group compared with the non-CMS Tibetan Chinese group
| Increase in LD | Decrease in LD | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ACE vs AKT3-45 | 21 | APOB vs eNOS3-17 | 1 | ACE vs AGT | 29 | AKT3-22 vs VEGFA-28 |
| 2 | ACE vs APOB | 22 | APOB vs VEGFA-69 | 2 | ACE vs eNOS3-10 | 30 | APOB vs EPAS1 |
| 3 | ACE vs VEGFA-13 | 23 | APOB vs VEGFA-34 | 3 | ACE vs eNOS3-17 | 31 | APOB vs eNOS3-10 |
| 4 | ACE vs VEGFA-15 | 24 | APOB vs VEGFA-13 | 4 | ACE vs VEGFA-79 | 32 | EGLN1-48 vs EPAS1 |
| 5 | AGT vs VEGFA-69 | 25 | APOB vs VEGFA-15 | 5 | ACE vs VEGFA-28 | 33 | EGLN1-48 vs eNOS3-10 |
| 6 | AGT vs VEGFA-34 | 26 | APOB vs VEGFA-30 | 6 | ACE vs VEGFA-30 | 34 | EGLN1-48 vs eNOS3-17 |
| 7 | AGTR1 vs APOB | 27 | EGLN1-48 vs VEGFA-28 | 7 | AGT vs EGLN1-48 | 35 | EGLN1-48 vs VEGFA-13 |
| 8 | AGTR1 vs EGLN1-48 | 28 | EGLN1-48 vs VEGFA-20 | 8 | AGT vs eNOS3-10 | 36 | EGLN1-48 vs VEGFA-15 |
| 9 | AGTR1 vs EPAS1 | 29 | EPAS1 vs VEGFA-15 | 9 | AGT vs eNOS3-17 | 37 | EGLN1-48 vs VEGFA-30 |
| 10 | AGTR1 vs VEGFA-69 | 30 | eNOS3-10 vs eNOS3-17 | 10 | AGT vs VEGFA-79 | 38 | EPAS1 vs VEGFA-69 |
| 11 | AGTR1 vs VEGFA-34 | 31 | VEGFA-69 vs VEGFA-13 | 11 | AGT vs VEGFA-13 | 39 | EPAS1 vs VEGFA-34 |
| 12 | AGTR1 vs VEGFA-13 | 32 | VEGFA-69 vs VEGFA-15 | 12 | AGT vs VEGFA-15 | 40 | EPAS1 vs VEGFA-20 |
| 13 | AGTR1 vs VEGFA-15 | 33 | VEGFA-69 vs VEGFA-20 | 13 | AGT vs VEGFA-20 | 41 | EPAS1 vs VEGFA-30 |
| 14 | AKT3-45 vs APOB | 34 | VEGFA-34 vs VEGFA-13 | 14 | AGTR1 vs AKT3-45 | 42 | eNOS3-10 vs VEGFA-69 |
| 15 | AKT3-22 vs APOB | 35 | VEGFA-34 vs VEGFA-15 | 15 | AGTR1 vs AKT3-22 | 43 | eNOS3-10 vs VEGFA-15 |
| 16 | AKT3-22 vs eNOS3-10 | 36 | VEGFA-34 vs VEGFA-20 | 16 | AGTR1 vs eNOS3-17 | 44 | eNOS3-10 vs VEGFA-20 |
| 17 | AKT3-22 vs eNOS3-17 | 37 | VEGFA-79 vs VEGFA-13 | 17 | AGTR1 vs VEGFA-28 | 45 | eNOS3-10 vs VEGFA-30 |
| 18 | AKT3-22 vs VEGFA-30 | 38 | VEGFA-79 vs VEGFA-28 | 18 | AKT3-45 vs AKT3-22 | 46 | eNOS3-17 vs VEGFA-69 |
| 19 | APOB vs EGLN1-48 | 39 | VEGFA-79 vs VEGFA-20 | 19 | AKT3-45 vs VEGFA-69 | 47 | eNOS3-17 vs VEGFA-34 |
| 20 | APOB vs EPAS1 | 40 | VEGFA-13 vs VEGFA-20 | 20 | AKT3-45 vs VEGFA-34 | 48 | eNOS3-17 vs VEGFA-79 |
| 21 | AKT3-45 vs VEGFA-79 | 49 | eNOS3-17 vs VEGFA-28 | ||||
| 22 | AKT3-45 vs VEGFA-13 | 50 | eNOS3-17 vs VEGFA-30 | ||||
| 23 | AKT3-45 vs VEGFA-28 | 51 | VEGFA-69 vs VEGFA-30 | ||||
| 24 | AKT3-45 vs VEGFA-15 | 52 | VEGFA-34 vs VEGFA-30 | ||||
| 25 | AKT3-45 vs VEGFA-30 | 53 | VEGFA-79 vs VEGFA-15 | ||||
| 26 | AKT3-22 vs VEGFA-69 | 54 | VEGFA-79 vs VEGFA-30 | ||||
| 27 | AKT3-22 vs VEGFA-34 | 55 | VEGFA-20 vs VEGFA-30 | ||||
| 28 | AKT3-22 vs VEGFA-79 |
Note: Increase and decrease in pairwise LD in the CMS group compared with the Tibetan Chinese control group are listed.
Abbreviations: LD, linkage disequilibrium; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; CMS, chronic mountain sickness.
Figure 2Pairwise LD for 18 SNPs in the CMS Tibetan Chinese group compared with the non-CMS Tibetan Chinese groups from Table 2 is graphed between the pathways. Figure (A) represents an increase in LD in the CMS group compared with the control group, whereas figure (B) represents a decrease in LD. The numbers are the pairwise associations.
Abbreviations: APOB, apolipoprotein B; HIF, hypoxia-inducible factor oxygen signaling pathway; RAS, renin–angiotension system; VEGFA, vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathway; LD, linkage disequilibrium; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; CMS, chronic mountain sickness.