Literature DB >> 28770148

Use of Simultaneous Nasogastric and Nasojejunal Tubes for Proximal Intestinal Atresias - A Preliminary Report.

Enono Yhoshu1, J K Mahajan1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28770148      PMCID: PMC5538615          DOI: 10.21699/jns.v6i2.528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neonatal Surg        ISSN: 2226-0439


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Sir Meeting the caloric needs of the baby in surgically repaired proximal intestinal atresias is a challenge. Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is not readily available everywhere, especially in the resource crunched set-ups, besides sepsis being a prohibitive accompaniment of TPN. Technical difficulties of performing feeding jejunostomy in a small baby, along with added complications of a second surgical procedure deter its use for enteral feeds. We describe novel use of two nasal tubes, one in stomach for drainage and other being a trans-anastomotic nasojejunal tube for enteral feeding. Over a period of 6 months, 6 neonates underwent repair for duodenal (4 cases) and proximal jejunal atresia (2 cases) in one Pediatric surgical unit. Each neonate was inserted two tubes, one through each nostril. Intraoperatively, one tube was manipulated across the anastomosis, while the other tube remained in the stomach. The atresias were repaired in the usual manner. Postoperatively, feeding was instituted through the nasojejunal tube, usually on 3rd or 4th post-operative day based on the abdominal condition of the baby. A contrast study was done through the nasogastric tube on 10th to 12th postoperative day and none of the patients showed anastomotic leak. Once patency of the anastomosis was confirmed, the nasogastric tube feeds were commenced. Gradually, the nasojejunal tube feeds were replaced by the nasogastric feeds. As the baby started tolerating feeds, both the tubes were removed. Total hospital stay ranged from 10 days to 4 weeks for 4 patients. None of the patients had any complications with the use of twin tubes. Two tubes in the nostrils caused no discomfort to the baby and also had no effect on respiration as monitored by the pulse oximetry. Other 2 patients expired after surgery; one was a case of multiple anomalies- tracheoesophageal fistula with esophageal atresia, anovestibular fistula, cleft palate and complex congenital heart disease and the other was a case of jejunal atresia, type-4 (apple peel) and died of sepsis. Early feeding in any surgical case is of utmost importance for wound healing and general well-being of the patient. In intestinal atresias, trans-anastomotic or a feeding jejunostomy beyond the anastomosis, parenteral nutrition and gastrostomy have all been used with variable success.[1] Complications of the nasojejunal tubes such as duodenal and jejunal perforations, changes in bowel flora, abdominal distension, vomiting and diarrhoea have been reported in the past.[2] None of the above complications were encountered in our patients. Although intraoperative placement of tubes through separate enterotomy provides access for enteral nutrition, but it is so with the added disadvantage of risk of leaks, inadvertent tube removal, peristomal infection, bleeding and hematoma, ulceration, gastric outlet obstruction and perforation.[2] Trans-anastomotic tube via the nasal route avoids additional surgery. However, there are concerns and objections about neonates being obligate nasal breathers.[3,4] During the act of breast feeding, larynx elevates to enable the epiglottis to slide up behind the soft palate locking the larynx into nasopharynx. This allows the infant to both swallow and breathe at the same time.[4,5] However, because of smaller oral airway, larger volume of tongue and close proximity of epiglottis with soft palate, the babies prefer to breathe through their nose rather than their mouths. The neonates, though, preferential nasal breathers, will adapt to mouth breathing given the need. Hence use of double tubes via both nares in proximal intestinal atresias in neonates is safe and well tolerated as well as allows for early institution of enteral feeds.

Footnotes

Source of Support: Nil Conflict of Interest: None
  5 in total

Review 1.  Are infants really obligatory nasal breathers?

Authors:  P S Bergeson; J C Shaw
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.168

2.  Congenital duodenal obstruction in neonates: a decade's experience from one center.

Authors:  Qing-Jiang Chen; Zhi-Gang Gao; Jin-Fa Tou; Yun-Zhong Qian; Min-Ju Li; Qi-Xing Xiong; Qiang Shu
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.764

3.  Duodenal perforation: a rare complication of neonatal nasojejunal tube feeding.

Authors:  S C Sun; S Samuels; J Lee; J R Marquis
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Longitudinal changes in suck-swallow-breathe, oxygen saturation, and heart rate patterns in term breastfeeding infants.

Authors:  Vanessa S Sakalidis; Jacqueline C Kent; Catherine P Garbin; Anna R Hepworth; Peter E Hartmann; Donna T Geddes
Journal:  J Hum Lact       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 2.219

Review 5.  Development of Suck and Swallow Mechanisms in Infants.

Authors:  Chantal Lau
Journal:  Ann Nutr Metab       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.374

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Outcomes and survival of infants with congenital duodenal obstruction following Kimura procedure with post-anastomosis jejunostomy feeding tube.

Authors:  Munawir Makkadafi; Aditya Rifqi Fauzi; Setya Wandita; Akhmad Makhmudi
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.067

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.