| Literature DB >> 28770087 |
Borja Milá1, James L Van Tassell2, Jatziri A Calderón1, Lukas Rüber3,4, Rafael Zardoya1.
Abstract
The adaptive radiation of the seven-spined gobies (Gobiidae: Gobiosomatini) represents a classic example of how ecological specialization and larval retention can drive speciation through local adaptation. However, geographically widespread and phenotypically uniform species also do occur within Gobiosomatini. This lack of phenotypic variation across large geographic areas could be due to recent colonization, widespread gene flow, or stabilizing selection acting across environmental gradients. We use a phylogeographic approach to test these alternative hypotheses in the naked goby Gobiosoma bosc, a widespread and phenotypically invariable intertidal fish found along the Atlantic Coast of North America. Using DNA sequence from 218 individuals sampled at 15 localities, we document marked intraspecific genetic structure in mitochondrial and nuclear genes at three main geographic scales: (i) between Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coast, (ii) between the west coast of the Florida peninsula and adjacent Gulf of Mexico across the Apalachicola Bay, and (iii) at local scales of a few hundred kilometers. Clades on either side of Florida diverged about 8 million years ago, whereas some populations along the East Cost show divergent phylogroups that have differentiated within the last 200,000 years. The absence of noticeable phenotypic or ecological differentiation among lineages suggests the role of stabilizing selection on ancestral phenotypes, together with isolation in allopatry due to reduced dispersal and restricted gene flow, as the most likely explanation for their divergence. Haplotype phylogenies and spatial patterns of genetic diversity reveal frequent population bottlenecks followed by rapid population growth, particularly along the Gulf of Mexico. The magnitude of the genetic divergence among intraspecific lineages suggests the existence of cryptic species within Gobiosoma and indicates that modes of speciation can vary among lineages within Gobiidae.Entities:
Keywords: Florida; Gobiidae; genetic diversity; genetic structure; phylogeography; speciation; stabilizing selection
Year: 2017 PMID: 28770087 PMCID: PMC5528222 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3161
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Minimum‐spanning network of 104 unique mtDNA haplotypes obtained from 218 individuals of Gobiosoma bosc sampled at 15 localities across its range (see Table 1). Haplotypes shown correspond to concatenated ATPase and COI haplotypes for each individual, each one preceded by “A” or “C,” respectively, in the final haplotype designation. Each circle in the network corresponds to a haplotype, with size proportional to its total frequency. Each branch corresponds to one nucleotide change, and cross‐bars indicate additional changes. Figures next to black squares indicate nucleotide changes between haplotypes when greater than three. Dashed lines indicate the approximate position of branches among the three main phylogroups. Blue line on the map depicts the Apalachicola River
Sampling localities and sample sizes for mtDNA genes (nmt) and the RAG1 nuclear gene (nnu)
| Locality | Site ID | nmt | nnu | State | Biogeographic Region | Latitude | Longitude |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hudson River | HRNY | 9 | 4 | New York | East Coast | 40.622657 | −74.068991 |
| Peconic River | PRNY | 20 | 5 | New York | East Coast | 40.981845 | −72.709166 |
| Vims | VIVA | 1 | 1 | Virginia | East Coast | 37.253843 | −76.377703 |
| South Carolina | SC | 22 | 8 | S. Carolina | East Coast | 32.865721 | −79.716628 |
| Jacksonville | JAFL | 16 | 8 | Florida | East Coast | 30.342613 | −81.392674 |
| Indian River | IRFL | 18 | 8 | Florida | East FL | 27.730127 | −80.406792 |
| Rose Bay | RBFL | 1 | 1 | Florida | East FL | 29.101224 | −80.962341 |
| Sebastian River | SRFL | 2 | 1 | Florida | East FL | 27.863391 | −80.488994 |
| Cedar Key | CKFL | 24 | 4 | Florida | West FL | 29.133051 | −83.037926 |
| Tampa Bay | TBFL | 14 | 7 | Florida | West FL | 27.651607 | −82.623163 |
| Apalachicola | APFL | 24 | 4 | Florida | Gulf Coast | 29.625725 | −85.120599 |
| Destin | DEFL | 21 | 1 | Florida | Gulf Coast | 30.384663 | −86.511548 |
| Empire | EMLA | 15 | 4 | Louisiana | Gulf Coast | 29.308323 | −89.533638 |
| Ocean Springs | OSMS | 12 | 3 | Mississippi | Gulf Coast | 30.401159 | −88.83142 |
| Galveston | GATX | 19 | 7 | Texas | Gulf Coast | 29.338036 | −94.724663 |
MtDNA genetic diversity and population expansion indices, including haplotype diversity (h), nucleotide diversity (π), and F values from Fu's test of neutrality. For population codes, see Table 1
| Population | nmt | No. mt haps |
| SE | π | SEπ |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| East Coast | 68 | 23 | 0.8920 | 0.0239 | 0.004097 | 0.002188 | −4.122 |
| PRNY | 20 | 5 | 0.7421 | 0.0715 | 0.002473 | 0.001458 | 2.636 |
| HRNY | 9 | 2 | 0.2222 | 0.1662 | 0.000598 | 0.000520 | 1.844 |
| VIVA | 1 | 1 | − | − | − | − | − |
| SC | 22 | 8 | 0.5455 | 0.1276 | 0.000674 | 0.000526 | −4.744 |
| JAFL | 16 | 8 | 0.8417 | 0.0748 | 0.001816 | 0.001141 | −1.821 |
| East Florida | 21 | 10 | 0.8476 | 0.0588 | 0.001143 | 0.000777 | −5.249 |
| IRFL+SRFL+RBFL | 21 | 10 | 0.8476 | 0.0588 | 0.001143 | 0.000777 | −5.249 |
| E FL+ East Coast | 89 | 33 | 0.9290 | 0.0150 | 0.004436 | 0.002343 | −10.085 |
| West Florida | 38 | 21 | 0.9033 | 0.0379 | 0.002148 | 0.001261 | −13.484 |
| TBFL | 14 | 8 | 0.8901 | 0.0603 | 0.002602 | 0.001560 | −1.169 |
| CKFL | 24 | 14 | 0.8007 | 0.0867 | 0.001435 | 0.000922 | −9.523 |
| Gulf of Mexico | 91 | 49 | 0.9407 | 0.0151 | 0.004673 | 0.002456 | −24.984 |
| APFL | 24 | 17 | 0.9203 | 0.0487 | 0.001847 | 0.001131 | −13.191 |
| DEFL | 21 | 15 | 0.9571 | 0.0301 | 0.003657 | 0.002048 | −5.506 |
| EMLA | 15 | 7 | 0.6571 | 0.1384 | 0.002420 | 0.001452 | −0.203 |
| OSMS | 12 | 6 | 0.6818 | 0.1482 | 0.001042 | 0.000753 | −2.032 |
| GATX | 19 | 6 | 0.5380 | 0.1330 | 0.002168 | 0.001308 | 0.993 |
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001.
Figure 2Minimum‐spanning network of four unique RAG1 haplotypes obtained from 62 individuals of Gobiosoma bosc sampled at 15 localities (see Table 1). Each circle in the network corresponds to a haplotype. Each branch corresponds to one nucleotide change, and cross‐bars indicate additional changes
Figure 3BEAST tree of 40 unique Gobiosoma bosc haplotypes obtained by concatenation of ATPase, COI, and RAG1 genes. Asterisks at nodes indicate Bayesian posterior probability of 1. Divergence times for the two main nodes (indicated by arrows) are provided. Time scale at the bottom is in million years
Genetic divergence among populations. Above diagonal: average number of pairwise differences among clades (π); along diagonal: average number of pairwise differences within clades (π); below diagonal: percent average pairwise differences among clades corrected for intraclade polymorphism (π − (π + π)/2)
| GC | WFL | EC | EFL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gulf Coast | 6.9 | 85.3 | 163.5 | 162.4 |
| West FL | 5.4 | 3.2 | 163.9 | 161.6 |
| East Coast | 10.6 | 10.7 | 6.1 | 8.2 |
| East FL | 10.6 | 10.7 | 0.3 | 1.7 |