| Literature DB >> 28769884 |
Matthew J Harke1, Andrew R Juhl1,2, Sheean T Haley1, Harriet Alexander3, Sonya T Dyhrman1,2.
Abstract
The concentration and composition of bioavailableEntities:
Keywords: MMETSP; conserved response; nitrogen; phosphorus; phytoplankton; transcriptome
Year: 2017 PMID: 28769884 PMCID: PMC5513979 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01279
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Growth curves for each species and each treatment during the experiment. Arrows indicate time of harvest for each treatment (designated by treatment abbreviation). RFU indicates “relative fluorescence unit.” Triangles represent the replete condition (control), squares represent the low N, and circles represent the low P. Error bars are the standard error of the mean (n = 3). For A. monilatum, growth curves were determined by cell counts due to difficulty in measuring reliable in vivo fluorescence.
Biochemical measurements at the time of harvest.
| Growth rate (μ) | 0.26 (10%) | 0.20 (17%) | 0.22 (26%) |
| POC (pmoles/cell) | 781.7 (8%) | 1328 (5%) | 1186 (6%) |
| PON (pmoles/cell) | 175.3 (4%) | 187.3 (3%) | 222.1 (10%) |
| C:N | 4.5 (5%) | 7.1 (7%) | 5.4 (4%) |
| pCHO (pmoles/cell) | 402 (31%) | 213 (20%) | 856 (39%) |
| Chl a (μg/cell) | 4.9E-05 (67%) | 8.5E-05 (11%) | 5.9E-05 (74%) |
| Fv/Fm | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Growth rate (μ) | 0.48 (5%) | 0.33 (4%) | 0.34 (1%) |
| POC (pmoles/cell) | 34.2 (17%) | 59.7 (14%) | 73.4 (4%) |
| PON (pmoles/cell) | 3.3 (21%) | 2.5 (8%) | 4.1 (6%) |
| C:N | 11.9 (4%) | 23.9 (18%) | 18.0 (2%) |
| pCHO (pmoles/cell) | 28.4 (55%) | 43.7 (30%) | 53.9 (1%) |
| Chl a (μg/cell) | 1.3E-06 (31%) | 1.3E-06 (28%) | 2.4E-06 (22%) |
| Fv/Fm | 0.59 (5%) | 0.58 (2%) | 0.55 (2%) |
| Growth rate (μ) | 0.80 (6%) | 0.57 (2%) | 0.62 (1%) |
| POC (pmoles/cell) | 14.1 (5%) | 13.2 (12%) | 10.0 (64%) |
| PON (pmoles/cell) | 2.1 (6%) | 0.96 (17%) | 0.97 (61%) |
| C:N | 6.8 (5%) | 12.0 (26%) | 9.9 (12%) |
| pCHO (pmoles/cell) | 5.6 (50%) | 10.7 (6%) | 7.1 (2%) |
| Chl a (μg/cell) | 3.1E-06 (11%) | 5.3E-07 (8%) | 1.9E-06 (6%) |
| Fv/Fm | 0.66 (4%) | 0.36 (5%) | 0.66 (1%) |
| Growth rate (μ) | 0.33 (5%) | 0.21 (3%) | 0.23 (7%) |
| POC (pmoles/cell) | 45.1 (64%) | 52.5 (28%) | 56.9 (49%) |
| PON (pmoles/cell) | 5.5 (55%) | 5.1 (26%) | 6.3 (46%) |
| C:N | 7.6 (21%) | 10.2 (3%) | 8.9 (5%) |
| pCHO (pmoles/cell) | 24.3 (21%) | 28.1 (33%) | 34.0 (65%) |
| Chl a (μg/cell) | 6.5E-06 (78%) | 6.8E-06 (23%) | 9.0E-06 (48%) |
| Fv/Fm | 0.46 (27%) | 0.42 (14%) | 0.44 (2%) |
| Growth rate (μ) | 0.83 (14%) | 0.55 (2%) | 0.45 (6%) |
| POC (pmoles/cell) | 0.64 (61%) | 0.85 (1%) | 1.01 (2%) |
| PON (pmoles/cell) | 0.067 (61%) | 0.069 (3%) | 0.044 (4%) |
| C:N | 9.6 (3%) | 19.4 (4%) | 14.6 (4%) |
| pCHO (pmoles/cell) | 0.17 (80%) | 0.24 (4%) | 0.37 (11%) |
| Chl a (μg/cell) | 1.02E-07 (71%) | 5.95E-08 (10%) | 8.07E-08 (13%) |
| Fv/Fm | 0.67 (2%) | 0.62 (3%) | 0.64 (2%) |
Values represent the mean (n = 3) with coefficient of variation (CV), the ratio of standard deviation to the mean, in parentheses. Asterisks indicate significant differences from replete, where
p < 0.05,
p < 0.005,
p < 0.0005, and
p < 0.0001 (one-way ANOVA with Fisher's LSD post-hoc test). Elemental ratios are molar. N/A, not measured.
Sequencing, assembly, annotation, and CEGMA completeness results for each species.
| 68.0 | 79.7 | 73.2 | 99,594 | 31 | 38 | 17 | 83.47 | |
| 70.0 | 42.7 | 58.3 | 96,684 | 23 | 29 | 14 | 76.61 | |
| 11.8 | 20.0 | 14.1 | 19,072 | 40 | 51 | 27 | 89.11 | |
| 26.0 | 28.7 | 31.0 | 38,577 | 29 | 57 | 21 | 84.68 | |
| 45.3 | 23.2 | 29.0 | 53,786 | 39 | 41 | 18 | 81.45 | |
The combined assembly represents an assembly of all treatments. Annotations are the percent of combined assembly, which were annotated via the NCGR pipeline (listing the largest percent obtained from all four databases surveyed), uniref90 database, and KEGG.
Figure 2Quantitative metabolic fingerprint depicting the proportion of reads assigned to contigs with KEGG ID's and binned by KEGG module for each species and treatment. White denotes no reads were mapped. Species are abbreviated as follows: Amo, A. monilatum; Pmi, P. minimum; Caf, C. affinis; Cpo, C. polylepis; and Goc, G. oceanica.
Figure 3Principal component analysis (PCA) of the proportion of reads assigned to contigs with KEGG ID's and binned by KEGG module for each species and treatment. Confidence (95%) ellipses are depicted for each species. Species are coded by color and treatment by shape.
Significant differential abundance results with ASC (Wu et al., 2010) displaying the percentage of contigs and orthologs with significant increases (ITA) or decreases (DTA) in transcript abundance (post-p > 0.95 of fold change > 2) relative to the replete condition.
| Low N | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.06 | |
| Low P | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.07 | |
| Low N | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.02 | |
| Low P | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.11 | 0.24 | |
| Low N | 34.27 | 16.89 | 33.44 | 14.99 | |
| Low P | 19.66 | 9.84 | 13.79 | 10.63 | |
| Low N | 8.71 | 3.43 | 7.95 | 3.70 | |
| Low P | 8.64 | 2.07 | 8.29 | 2.11 | |
| Low N | 1.43 | 1.01 | 0.98 | 0.82 | |
| Low P | 3.86 | 3.16 | 3.42 | 2.92 | |
Figure 4(A) Venn diagram displaying the number of orthologous groups shared between the five species and (B) the percent of total orthologous groups for each species that are core (shared by all species), shared (shared with one to three species), and unique (only found in that species).
Figure 5The distribution of conserved orthologous groups with significant (ASC, post-p > 0.95 of fold change > 2) differential abundance (log2-fold change relative to replete) where responses were shared between (A) two species and (B) three species for each treatment or in both treatments (Universal). Color denotes direction of abundance relative to replete with increased transcript abundance in red (↑), decreased transcript abundance in blue (↓), and both increased and decreased across species in gray (↑↓). (C) Heatmap of orthologs with universal response (all significantly decreased abundance across three species and both treatments). When no KEGG module could be identified, it was denoted as N/A.
Figure 6Schematic cell model depicting the significant (ASC, post-p > 0.95 of fold change > 2) ortholog responses associated with conserved nitrogen stress (green) and phosphorus stress (orange) responses in each species. Solid lines and arrows represent known pathways while dashed lines and arrows indicate potential pathways. For log2-fold change heat maps (treatment vs. replete), red colors denote increase in transcript abundance, blue colors denote decrease in transcript abundance, and gray denotes no differential expression. Orthologous group ID is above each fold change heat map box. The dinoflagellates were not included in this analysis. Caf, C. affinis; Cpo, C. polylepis; Goc, G. oceanica.