Literature DB >> 28769259

STUDY ON INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT IN A GOITRE PREVALENCE SURVEY.

P B Pillai1, G S Saiprasad1, D R Basannar2, A G Gokarn3.   

Abstract

Observers differ in their judgment while assessing physical signs in a patient. We had undertaken a goitre prevalence survey amongst school students in a Rural Health Training Centre, Pune district (Maharashtra) during October 1992. Four teams of trained observers were used for detection of goitre. This study was undertaken to estimate the extent and acceptability of interobserver agreement amongst the four teams. Observer variation/agreement was measured by two methods viz. kappa coefficient and proportion of agreement. The proportion of agreement appears to be a better measure of observer agreement as it could make a distinction between normality (absence of goitre) and abnormality (presence of goitre). In the present study, the proportion of agreement for abnormality ranged between 0.62 - 0.83. This measure was considered as indicating a good interobserver agreement in detecting goitre in the survey that was undertaken.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Confidence intervals; Epidemiologic methods; Health surveys; Observer variation

Year:  2017        PMID: 28769259      PMCID: PMC5529923          DOI: 10.1016/S0377-1237(17)30937-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India        ISSN: 0377-1237


  5 in total

1.  Technique of endemic goitre surveys.

Authors:  C PEREZ; N S SCRIMSHAW; J A MUNOZ
Journal:  Monogr Ser World Health Organ       Date:  1960

2.  Disagreement between observers in an epidemiological study of respiratory disease.

Authors:  R S SCHILLING; J P HUGHES; I DINGWALL-FORDYCE
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1955-01-08

3.  Finger clubbing; validity as a physical sign.

Authors:  D A PYKE
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1954-08-21       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  The fetal heart rate trace is normal, isn't it? Observer agreement of categorical assessments.

Authors:  J M Grant
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-01-26       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  A comparison of three methods of assessing inter-observer variation applied to measurement of the symphysis-fundal height.

Authors:  S M Bailey; P Sarmandal; J M Grant
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1989-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.