| Literature DB >> 28769091 |
Pinjing He1,2,3, Qinfang Yu1,2, Hua Zhang1,2, Liming Shao2,3, Fan Lü4,5.
Abstract
The effects of humic acid (HA) and fulvic acid (FA) on Cu2+ adsorption on biochar were investigated, with mechanisms confirmed by excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. HA loading enhanced Cu2+ adsorption on biochar, with the maximum enhancement of 55.0% occurring at an HA loading of 100 mg-C/L. The adsorbed HA introduced many additional functional groups to biochar, thus enhancing Cu2+ adsorption, which decreased at HA concentrations >100 mg-C/L due to self-association of HA at high loading concentrations. In contrast, FA loading caused no enhancement on Cu2+ adsorption on biochar. FA was adsorbed through H-bonding with the functional groups of biochar, which set up a competition with Cu2+ for adsorption on biochar. The functional groups occupied by adsorbed FA were offset by the newly introduced functional groups of FA, thus there was no net increase in the amount of Cu2+ adsorption upon FA loading. These findings imply that, because of the enhanced adsorption of HA-loaded biochar, the amount of Cu2+ immobilized would increase by 28.2% for mature compost and 31.9% for fresh compost if there exist interaction between biochar and HA compared with the amounts immobilized by non-interactive HA and biochar.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28769091 PMCID: PMC5541037 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07507-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Characteristics of biochar and DOM.
| Sample | Elemental composition | Molar H/C | Molar (O+N)/C | Acid groups (mmol/g) | Specific surface area (m2/g) | SUVA254 (L mg−1 m−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ash | C | H | N | O | ||||||
| (%dw) | ||||||||||
| Biochar | 14.3 | 69.2 | 3.6 | 0.6 | 12.3 | 0.62 ± 0.01 | 0.14 ± 0.04 | 1.20 | 8.9 | — |
| HA | 14.4 | 19.6 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 64.0 | 1.19 ± 0.09 | 2.46 ± 0.11 | — | — | 8.99 |
| FA | 24.9 | 26.8 | 4.1 | 2.2 | 42.0 | 1.84 ± 0.07 | 1.25 ± 0.01 | — | — | 2.29 |
Figure 1FTIR spectra of HA, FA, biochar, HA-loaded biochar, FA-loaded biochar, Cu-loaded biochar, Cu-HA-loaded biochar and Cu-FA-loaded biochar.
Figure 2(a) PARAFAC-derived component of HA; (b) PARAFAC-derived component of FA; and (c) Fluorescence quenching of four PARAFAC-derived components with the addition of Cu2+. F/F0 means the ratio of fluorescence intensity with Cu2+ addition to the initial fluorescence intensity.
Isotherm parameters for Cu2+ binding to DOM and adsorption on biochar.
| Adsorbent | Langmuir | Freundlich | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| R2 |
| n | R2 | |
| HA[1] | 222 ± 13 | 0.33 ± 0.05 | 0.992 | — | — | — |
| FA[1] | 128 ± 11 | 0.44 ± 0.10 | 0.976 | — | — | — |
| BC | 18.8 ± 1.7 | 0.013 ± 0.005 | 0.880 | 2.3 ± 0.3 | 3.2 ± 0.3 | 0.980 |
| BC-HA50 | 29.9 ± 1.9 | 0.009 ± 0.002 | 0.960 | 2.7 ± 0.5 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 0.978 |
| BC-HA250 | 19.5 ± 1.6 | 0.014 ± 0.004 | 0.893 | 2.5 ± 0.3 | 3.2 ± 0.2 | 0.985 |
| BC-FA50 | 15.3 ± 1.1 | 0.016 ± 0.005 | 0.901 | 2.4 ± 0.3 | 3.6 ± 0.4 | 0.958 |
| BC-FA200 | 16.9 ± 1.0 | 0.018 ± 0.005 | 0.921 | 3.0 ± 0.4 | 3.8 ± 0.3 | 0.978 |
[1]For HA and FA, g represents g-C.
Figure 3Adsorption isotherms of HA, FA, and FA in the presence of Cu2+ on biochar.
Figure 4Effects of (a) HA loading level and (b) FA loading level on the amount of Cu2+ adsorption on biochar.
Extractability of adsorbed Cu2+.
| Sample | Cu | Cu | Cu |
|---|---|---|---|
| BC | 14.9 ± 0.9 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 8.2 ± 0.3 |
| BC-HA50 | 23.0 ± 1.4 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 4.0 ± 0.2 |
| BC-HA250 | 17.3 ± 1.0 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 6.8 ± 0.2 |
| BC-FA50 | 14.6 ± 0.8 | 1.2 ± 0.0 | 8.3 ± 0.5 |
| BC-FA250 | 15.3 ± 1.6 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 8.1 ± 0.2 |
Figure 5Schematic diagram of the interactions between Cu2+ and (a) biochar; (b) low levels of HA-loaded biochar; (c) high levels of HA-loaded biochar; (d) FA-loaded biochar.
Potentially amounts of immobilized Cu2+ in fresh and mature compost.
| Items (per g-C-compost) | Substance | Fresh compost | Mature compost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Content (g[1]) | FA[1] in compost | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| HA[1] in compost | 0.03 | 0.10 | |
| Biochar | 0.91 | 1.85 | |
| Alone immobilized Cu (mg-Cu): biochar doesn’t adsorb FA or HA | FA in compost | 10.2 (soluble) | 10.2 (soluble) |
| HA in compost | 6.7 | 22.2 | |
| Biochar | 17.1 | 34.8 | |
| Sum1[2] | 34.0 | 67.2 | |
| Sum2[3] | 23.8 | 57 | |
| Combined immobilized Cu (mg-Cu): biochar adsorbs FA only | FA in compost (adsorption deducted) | 7.9 (soluble) | 7.7 (soluble) |
| HA in compost | 6.7 | 22.2 | |
| Biochar (loaded with FA) | 14.6 | 29.6 | |
| Sum1[2] | 29.2 | 59.5 | |
| Sum2[3] | 21.3 | 51.8 | |
| Combined immobilized Cu (mg-Cu): biochar adsorbs HA only | FA in compost | 10.2 (soluble) | 10.2 (soluble) |
| HA in compost (adsorption deducted) | 6.1 | 20.7 | |
| Biochar (loaded with HA) | 25.3 | 52.4 | |
| Sum1[2] | 41.6 | 83.3 | |
| Sum2[3] | 31.4 | 73.1 |
[1]For HA and FA, g represents g-C.
[2]Sum1 means the sum of Cu2+ immobilized by FA, HA and biochar.
[3]Sum2 means the sum of Cu2+ immobilized by HA and biochar, where FA-Cu complex is regarded as not immobilized.