Literature DB >> 28768782

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients : a systematic review.

U G Longo1, M Ciuffreda1, C Casciaro1, N Mannering2, V Candela1, G Salvatore1, V Denaro1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Different methods of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have been described for skeletally immature patients before closure of the growth plates. However, the outcome and complications following this treatment remain unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to analyse the outcome and complications of different techniques which may be used for reconstruction of the ACL in these patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. This involved a comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase and Google Scholar databases using the following combinations of keywords, "knee", "anterior cruciate ligament", "reconstruction", "injury", "children", "adolescent", "skeletally immature", "open physis" and "surgery".
RESULTS: A total of 53 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. The overall rate of disturbance of growth after ACL reconstruction was 2.6%, with no statistical difference between transphyseal and physeal-sparing techniques. Physeal-sparing techniques had a lower rate of post-operative complications compared with transphyseal techniques (p = 0.0045). Outcomes assessed were Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, the IKDC grade, the Tegner score and the KT-1000. Both techniques had similar clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: This review reveals low rates of disturbance of growth after ACL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients. Although limited, the available evidence did not support any particular surgical technique when considering disturbance of growth or clinical outcome. Further randomised controlled trials are needed to investigate the efficacy of differing surgical techniques on outcomes in skeletally immature patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1053-60. ©2017 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament; Children; Graft; Reconstruction; Skeletally immature

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28768782     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B8.BJJ-2016-1150.R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  17 in total

1.  Over the top anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with open physes: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Riccardo Maria Lanzetti; Valerio Pace; Alessandro Ciompi; Dario Perugia; Marco Spoliti; Francesco Falez; Caraffa Auro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Increasing incidence of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 17-year population-based study.

Authors:  Yuba Raj Paudel; Mark Sommerfeldt; Don Voaklander
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 4.114

3.  Lateral extra-articular tenodesis and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young patients: clinical results and return to sport.

Authors:  Amedeo Guarino; Luca Farinelli; Venanzio Iacono; Daniele Screpis; Gianluca Piovan; Maria Rizzo; Massimo Mariconda; Claudio Zorzi
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-04-25

4.  Posterior Approach With Small Incision Is a Safe Alternative to Anterior Approach for Hamstring Autograft Harvest in Adolescents.

Authors:  Alexandra H Aitchison; Lindsay M Schlichte; Madison R Heath; Peter D Fabricant; Daniel W Green
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2022-03-25

5.  Comparison of pain behaviour and osteoarthritis progression between anterior cruciate ligament transection and osteochondral injury in rat models.

Authors:  T Tawonsawatruk; O Sriwatananukulkit; W Himakhun; W Hemstapat
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 5.853

6.  The effect of femoral bone tunnel configuration on tendon-bone healing in an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An animal study.

Authors:  Y Sato; R Akagi; Y Akatsu; Y Matsuura; S Takahashi; S Yamaguchi; T Enomoto; R Nakagawa; H Hoshi; T Sasaki; S Kimura; Y Ogawa; A Sadamasu; S Ohtori; T Sasho
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 5.853

7.  Intrasubstance Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in the Pediatric Population.

Authors:  Alexandr Aylyarov; Mikhail Tretiakov; Sarah E Walker; Claude B Scott; Khalid Hesham; Aditya V Maheshwari
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  One in 5 Athletes Sustain Reinjury Upon Return to High-Risk Sports After ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review in 1239 Athletes Younger Than 20 Years.

Authors:  Sue Barber-Westin; Frank R Noyes
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.843

9.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Lateral Plasty in High-Risk Young Adolescents: Revisions, Subjective Evaluation, and the Role of Surgical Timing on Meniscal Preservation.

Authors:  Alberto Grassi; Luca Macchiarola; Gian Andrea Lucidi; Giacomo Dal Fabbro; Massimilano Mosca; Silvio Caravelli; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.355

10.  Use of a Modified All-Epiphyseal Technique for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the Skeletally Immature Patient.

Authors:  Andrew T Pennock; Henry G Chambers; Robby D Turk; Kristina M Parvanta; M Morgan Dennis; Eric W Edmonds
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-07-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.