| Literature DB >> 28768526 |
Fatemeh Khani-Varzegani1, Leila Erfanparast2, Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi3,4, Marziyeh Shokravi5, Fariba Azabdaftari6, Marziyeh Parto2, Behjat Shokrvash7.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to identify the oral health status and influencing factors in preschool children in Tabriz, Iran. A total of 756 children from 20% of the total district preschools were selected using a two-step random sampling procedure. Questionnaires were used to collect demographic and socio-economic data. Oral exams were conducted by a single pediatric dentist to assess the children's oral health, and to determine the number of decayed, missing, and filled teeth (dmft) according to the World Health Organization's (WHO) definition of caries.Entities:
Keywords: Dental caries; Iran; Oral health; Pediatric dentistry; dmft index
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28768526 PMCID: PMC5541691 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-017-2698-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Sample characteristics
| All (n = 756) | Boy (n = 389) | Girl (n = 367) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child age (years) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | 0.975* |
| 4 | 53 (7.0) | 27 (50.1) | 26 (49.1) | |
| 5 | 185 (24.5) | 95 (51.4) | 90 (48.6) | |
| 6 | 405 (53.6) | 209 (51.6) | 196 (48.4) | |
| 7 | 113 (14.9) | 58 (51.3) | 55 (48.7) | |
| M (SD) | 5.76 (0.78) | 5.76 (0.77) | 5.76 (0.79) | |
| Mother education (years) | 0.650** | |||
| 0–12 | 465 (61.5) | 243 (62.4) | 220 (60) | |
| ≥13 | 291 (38.5) | 146 (37.6) | 147 (40) | |
| M (SD) | 12.43 (3.56) | 12.24 (3.64) | 12.63 (3.45) | |
| Mother employment | 0.650** | |||
| Housewife | 587 (77.6) | 307 (78.9) | 280 (76.3) | |
| Employed out of home | 149 (19.7) | 73 (18.8) | 76 (20.7) | |
| Employed at home | 20 (2.6) | 9 (2.3) | 11 (3) | |
| FAS | 0.002** | |||
| Low (≤10) | 255 (33.7) | 148 (38) | 107 (29.2) | |
| Intermediate (11–13) | 336 (44.4) | 149 (38.3) | 187 (51) | |
| High (≥14) | 165 (21.8) | 92 (23.7) | 73 (19.9) | |
| M (SD) | 11.39 (2.93) | 11.38 (2.95) | 11.46 (2.74) | |
M (SD) mean (standard deviation), FAS family affluence scale
* P value based on Independent Sample T test
** P value based on Chi square Test
Distribution and comparison of dmft index by sex and age groups
| dmft index Med (25th–75th) | P value | |
|---|---|---|
| Child sex | 0.675* | |
| Boy (51.5%) | 4 (2–9) | |
| Girl | 5 (2–8) | |
| Child age (years) | <0.001** | |
| 4 | 2 (0–4) | |
| 5 | 3 (2–5) | |
| 6 | 5 (3–9) | |
| 7 | 8 (4–11) | |
| Mother education (years) | <0.001* | |
| 0–12 | 6 (3–10) | |
| ≥13 | 3 (1–6) | |
| M (SD) | 12.63 (3.45) | |
| Mother employment | <0.001** | |
| Housewife | 5 (2–9) | |
| Employed out of home | 3 (1–6) | |
| Employed at home | 4.5 (3–9.25) | |
| FAS | <0.001** | |
| Low (≤10) | 6 (3–10) | |
| Intermediate (11–13) | 4 (2–7) | |
| High (≥14) | 4 (2–7) |
dmft index decay, missing, filled teeth index, Med (25th–75th) median (25th–75th Percentile), M (SD) mean (standard deviation), FAS family affluence scale
* P value based on nonparametric Mann–Whitney U Test
** P value based on nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis Test
Distribution of dental decay prevalence among pre-school children by sex and age group
| Age (years) | All | Boy | Girl | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 756 (%100) | 380 (%51.5) | 367 (%48.5) | ||||
| Dental decay free N (%) | Dental decay ≥1 N (%) | Dental decay free N (%) | Dental decay ≥1 N (%) | Dental decay free N (%) | Dental decay ≥1 N (%) | |
| 4 | 14 (26.9) | 38 (73.1) | 6 (23.1) | 20 (76.9) | 8 (30.8) | 18 (69.2) |
| 5 | 41 (22.0) | 141 (78.0) | 25 (26.0) | 71 (74.0) | 16 (17.8) | 74 (82.2) |
| 6 | 50 (12.3) | 355 (87.7) | 28 (13.3) | 183 (86.7) | 22 (11.3) | 172 (88.7) |
| 7 | 10 (18.8) | 103 (91.2) | 8 (14.3) | 48 (85.7) | 2 (3.5) | 55 (96.5) |
| Total | 115 (15.2) | 641 (84.8) | 67 (17.2) | 322 (82.8) | 48 (13.1) | 319 (86.9) |
Multivariate analysis of underlying predictors of dmft index
| Coefficient | 95% (CI) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Child sex | |||
| Boy | Referent | – | – |
| Girl | 1.00 | (0.27 to 1.73) | 0.007 |
| Child age (years) | |||
| 4 | Referent | – | – |
| 5 | 1.00 | (−0.56 to 2.56) | 0.210 |
| 6 | 2.00 | (0.53 to 3.47) | 0.008 |
| 7 | 4.00 | (2.31 to 5.69) | <0.001 |
| Mothers education (years) | |||
| 0–12 | Referent | – | – |
| ≥13 | −2.00 | (−2.94 to −1.06) | <0.001 |
| Mother employment | |||
| Housewife | Referent | – | – |
| Employed out of home | 0.00 | (−1.11 to 1.11) | 1.000 |
| Employed at home | −1.00 | (−3.27 to 1.27) | 0.387 |
| FAS | |||
| Low (≤10) | Referent | – | – |
| Intermediate (11–13) | −1.00 | (−1.87 to −0.13) | 0.024 |
| High (≥14) | −1.00 | (−2.09 to 0.09) | 0.072 |
95% (CI) 95% (confidence interval), FAS family affluence scale
P value based on multivariate analysis by quintile regression