Literature DB >> 28767542

Factors Influencing Physicians' Selection of Continuous Professional Development Activities: A Cross-Specialty National Survey.

David A Cook1, David W Price, Christopher M Wittich, Colin P West, Morris J Blachman.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We sought to understand what influences physicians' decisions about participation in continuous professional development (CPD) activities, and how often physicians engage in specific CPD activities.
METHODS: From September 2015 to April 2016, we administered a survey to 4648 randomly sampled licensed US physicians. Survey items addressed perceived barriers to CPD, factors that might influence participation in four prototypical CPD activities (reading an article, or completing a local activity, online course, or far-away course), and frequency of CPD engagement.
RESULTS: Nine hundred eighty-eight (21.6%) physicians responded. The most important barriers were time (mean [SD] 3.5 [1.3], 1 = not important, 5 = extremely important) and cost (2.9 [1.3]). In prioritizing factors influencing participation in four prototypical CPD activities, topical relevance consistently had the highest average rank. Quality of content and time to complete the activity were also frequently selected. Over the past 3 years, most physicians reported having participated in patient-focused learning and self-directed learning on a weekly basis; quality improvement and local continuing medical education (CME) activities several times per year; online learning, on-site courses, and national board-related activities a few times per year; and interprofessional learning less than once per year. Physicians believed that they ought to engage more often in all of these activities except board-related activities. They would like CME credit for these activities much more often than currently obtained. DISCUSSION: The reasons physicians select a given CPD activity vary by activity, but invariably include topic and quality of content. Physicians want CME credit for the CPD activities they are already doing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28767542     DOI: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof        ISSN: 0894-1912            Impact factor:   1.355


  5 in total

1.  Barriers and facilitators to implementing a continuing medical education intervention in a primary health care setting.

Authors:  Teresa Reis; Inês Faria; Helena Serra; Miguel Xavier
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.908

2.  Physician engagement in regularly scheduled rounds.

Authors:  Adam Bass; Heather Armson; Kevin McLaughlin; Jocelyn Lockyer
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2021-04-30

3.  A qualitative study of clinicians' perspectives on independent rights advice for involuntary psychiatric patients in British Columbia, Canada.

Authors:  Iva W Cheung; Diego S Silva; Kimberly J Miller; Erin E Michalak; Charles H Goldsmith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Barriers to identifying and obtaining CME: a national survey of physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants.

Authors:  Maureen O'Brien Pott; Anissa S Blanshan; Kelly M Huneke; Barbara L Baasch Thomas; David A Cook
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Professional training on shared decision making with older adults living with neurocognitive disorders: a mixed-methods implementation study.

Authors:  Moulikatou Adouni Lawani; Luc Côté; Laetitia Coudert; Michèle Morin; Holly O Witteman; Danielle Caron; Edeltraut Kroger; Philippe Voyer; Charo Rodriguez; France Légaré; Anik M C Giguere
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.796

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.