Literature DB >> 28766905

Evidence for reduced neurogenesis in the aging human hippocampus despite stable stem cell markers.

Kathryn J Mathews1, Katherine M Allen2,3, Danny Boerrigter2,3, Helen Ball4, Cynthia Shannon Weickert2,3,5, Kay L Double1.   

Abstract

Reduced neurogenesis in the aging mammalian hippocampus has been linked to cognitive deficits and increased risk of dementia. We utilized postmortem human hippocampal tissue from 26 subjects aged 18-88 years to investigate changes in expression of six genes representing different stages of neurogenesis across the healthy adult lifespan. Progressive and significant decreases in mRNA levels of the proliferation marker Ki67 (MKI67) and the immature neuronal marker doublecortin (DCX) were found in the healthy human hippocampus over the lifespan. In contrast, expression of genes for the stem cell marker glial fibrillary acidic protein delta and the neuronal progenitor marker eomesodermin was unchanged with age. These data are consistent with a persistence of the hippocampal stem cell population with age. Age-associated expression of the proliferation and immature neuron markers MKI67 and DCX, respectively, was unrelated, suggesting that neurogenesis-associated processes are independently altered at these points in the development from stem cell to neuron. These data are the first to demonstrate normal age-related decreases at specific stages of adult human hippocampal neurogenesis.
© 2017 The Authors. Aging Cell published by the Anatomical Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ki67; cognition; doublecortin; healthy aging; hippocampus; neurogenesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28766905      PMCID: PMC5595679          DOI: 10.1111/acel.12641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Cell        ISSN: 1474-9718            Impact factor:   9.304


Introduction

Neurogenesis persists in the subgranular zone of the adult human hippocampus and arises from a pool of quiescent stem cells which, if appropriately stimulated, undergo proliferation and subsequent maturation into neurons. These new neurons are thought to play an important role in normal hippocampal function, particularly in the ongoing maintenance of hippocampus‐dependent spatial and declarative memory (Aimone et al., 2014; Christian et al., 2014). It has therefore been hypothesized that alterations in hippocampal neurogenesis may be a contributing factor to cognitive decline and dementia. This is supported by observations that radiation‐induced ablation of hippocampal neurogenesis in rats results in cognitive decline (Monje et al., 2002) and clinical evidence of cognitive changes in patients receiving radiation therapy and chemotherapy (Monje & Dietrich, 2012). Further evidence of a relationship between hippocampal neurogenesis and cognitive function is provided by disorders associated with cognitive decline, including Alzheimer's disease (Boekhoorn et al., 2006) and Parkinson's disease (Hoglinger et al., 2004) where stem cell proliferation and/or nascent neuron maturation is altered. The birth of new neurons is a complex, multistep process, any stage of which could potentially be altered with age (Fig. 1). Reduced neurogenesis in the aged rodent hippocampus has been attributed to impaired proliferation and maturation of neuronal precursors (Rao et al., 2006). The two available studies of neurogenesis in the aging human hippocampus using immunohistochemical (Knoth et al., 2010) and carbon dating (Spalding et al., 2013) techniques suggest that hippocampal neurogenesis is progressively reduced with age but employed markers that were either relatively restricted to a specific developmental stage or that broadly identified new cell birth (Fig. 1). To date, no studies have investigated the progression of neurogenesis through quiescence, proliferation, differentiation and maturation in the same hippocampal tissue over the healthy adult lifespan. Appreciating at which stage neurogenesis may fail with age in the human brain is critical to the development of strategies that aim to preserve neurogenesis and thus, cognitive function. Studies in aged rodents consistently report that interventions including exercise (Van Praag et al., 2005), environmental enrichment (Kempermann et al., 2002), inflammatory blockade (Monje et al., 2003; Ormerod et al., 2013; Speisman et al., 2013) or hormonal modulation (Montaron et al., 1999) are associated with both increased neurogenesis and improved cognition. The potential of similar interventions, such as exercise or cognitive training, in maintaining cognitive function in the healthy aged human brain is now recognized (Ballesteros et al., 2015), although for technical reasons linking these findings to human neurogenesis is more difficult. Such approaches will, however, be most effective if an adequate pool of quiescent stem cells are available to be influenced for therapeutic benefit.
Figure 1

Staging neurogenesis using transcripts representative of different developmental stages from stem cell to neuron. Neurogenesis‐associated genes are variably expressed throughout development from stem cell to functional neuron. In this study, expression of genes (blue) was chosen for their ability to identify discrete points of neurogenesis with minimal cross‐over between developmental stages. Previous studies of hippocampal neurogenesis over the human lifespan (orange) have reported either late‐stage development of neurons only or the broad birth of neurons without identifying different stages of neurogenesis. Arrows represent age‐related reductions (↓) or unchanged (↔) expression of the markers. δ – glial fibrillary acidic protein delta; , Ki67; eomesodermin; doublecortin; IHC, immunohistochemistry.

Staging neurogenesis using transcripts representative of different developmental stages from stem cell to neuron. Neurogenesis‐associated genes are variably expressed throughout development from stem cell to functional neuron. In this study, expression of genes (blue) was chosen for their ability to identify discrete points of neurogenesis with minimal cross‐over between developmental stages. Previous studies of hippocampal neurogenesis over the human lifespan (orange) have reported either late‐stage development of neurons only or the broad birth of neurons without identifying different stages of neurogenesis. Arrows represent age‐related reductions (↓) or unchanged (↔) expression of the markers. δ – glial fibrillary acidic protein delta; , Ki67; eomesodermin; doublecortin; IHC, immunohistochemistry. Despite these promising avenues of research, the effect of age upon the hippocampal stem cell population in the rodent brain remains a matter of debate and has not been explored in the human hippocampus. Hippocampal stem cells in the rodent brain were reported to possess no means of self‐renewal (Encinas et al., 2011), suggesting that a stem cell deficit may underlie the observed progressive decline in neurogenesis with age (Walter et al., 2011; Andersen et al., 2014). In contrast, other studies reported that hippocampal stem cells in the rodent brain are capable of self‐renewal (Suh et al., 2007) and that this ability persists throughout adulthood (Montaron et al., 1999; Hattiangady & Shetty, 2008; Bonaguidi et al., 2011), which may thus represent a tractable target for restoring age‐related decreases in neurogenesis. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of age upon multiple stages of neurogenesis by analysing changes to neurogenesis‐associated gene expression across the healthy adult human lifespan. Gene transcripts were chosen to estimate the proportion of cells at different stages of neurogenesis (Fig. 1, Table S2). Markers for stem cells (glial fibrillary acidic protein isoform delta; GFAPδ), cell proliferation (Ki67; MKI67), neuronal progenitor cells (eomesodermin; EOMES), immature neurons (doublecortin; DCX) and mature astrocytes (S100 calcium‐binding protein B; S100B and glial fibrillary acidic protein; GFAP – although GFAP also marks stem cells) were quantified using quantitative reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (qRT–PCR) from total RNA extracted from the hippocampus of 26 normal individuals aged 18–88 (Table S1, Data S1). In this study, we found that expression of genetic markers for cellular proliferation (MKI67; ρ(26) = −0.577; P = 0.002, Fig. 2a) and neuronal maturation (DCX; ρ(26) = −0.617; P = 0.001, Fig. 2b) declined significantly with age. Immunohistochemistry studies in both humans and rodents report declining protein expression of these markers with age (Rao et al., 2006; Knoth et al., 2010), and we show here that these findings likely reflect transcriptional changes preceding protein synthesis. We found no significant relationship between our markers of proliferation and of immature neurons (MKI67 and DCX mRNAs) when controlling for age (partial correlation, r(23) = −0.162; P = 0.439), suggesting that the decline in expression of these genes represents independent changes. In contrast to MKI67 and DCX mRNAs, expression of the stem cell marker GFAPδ (ρ(26) = 0.227; P = 0.264, Fig. 2c) and the neuronal progenitor marker EOMES (ρ(26) = −0.067; P = 0.745, Fig. 2d) was unchanged with age. Expression of GFAP was significantly increased with age (ρ(26) = 0.486; P = 0.012; Fig. 2e), while S100B was unchanged with age (ρ(26) = 0.070; P = 0.734; Fig. 2f).
Figure 2

Alterations in neurogenesis gene expression and astrocytic activation state with age. Expression of marker Ki67 () (a) and doublecortin () (b) was significantly reduced with age; in contrast, expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein isoform delta (δ) (c) and eomesodermin () (d) did not vary with age. expression (e) significantly increased with age, but expression of S100B was unchanged (f), suggesting that the rate of astrogliogenesis was unvaried. Astrocyte morphology was examined using immunofluorescence in a subset of five cases as indicated in Table S1 (supporting information). Astrocytes within the hippocampus of younger individuals (g; representative image from an 18‐year‐old) exhibited typical astrocyte morphology with narrow, radiating processes and small cell bodies. Astrocytes within the hippocampus of older individuals (h; representative image from a 73‐year‐old) primarily presented with larger cell bodies strongly stained for GFAP and thick radiating processes, consistent with the morphology of activated astrocytes. Scale bar = 75 μm. Inset: magnified images of the field bound by the dotted box.

Alterations in neurogenesis gene expression and astrocytic activation state with age. Expression of marker Ki67 () (a) and doublecortin () (b) was significantly reduced with age; in contrast, expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein isoform delta (δ) (c) and eomesodermin () (d) did not vary with age. expression (e) significantly increased with age, but expression of S100B was unchanged (f), suggesting that the rate of astrogliogenesis was unvaried. Astrocyte morphology was examined using immunofluorescence in a subset of five cases as indicated in Table S1 (supporting information). Astrocytes within the hippocampus of younger individuals (g; representative image from an 18‐year‐old) exhibited typical astrocyte morphology with narrow, radiating processes and small cell bodies. Astrocytes within the hippocampus of older individuals (h; representative image from a 73‐year‐old) primarily presented with larger cell bodies strongly stained for GFAP and thick radiating processes, consistent with the morphology of activated astrocytes. Scale bar = 75 μm. Inset: magnified images of the field bound by the dotted box. In order to explore the potential persistence of the hippocampal stem cell population with age, we investigated the expression of GFAPδ, an isoform of GFAP associated with quiescent stem cells (Roelofs et al., 2005). GFAPδ mRNA upregulation concurrent with GFAP mRNA upregulation has been reported (Roelofs et al., 2005) and has also been noted at the protein level in reactive astrocytes (Roelofs et al., 2005; Martinian et al., 2009). A partial correlation of age with GFAPδ expression, controlling for GFAP expression, however, found no relationship between these factors, (r(23) = −0.001; P = 0.995), demonstrating that expression of GFAPδ is independent of age despite the age‐associated increase in GFAP. Our finding of consistent GFAPδ expression, coupled with significantly reduced proliferation, suggests therefore that the stem cell pool in the aging human hippocampus is not depleted over time. Rather, intra‐ or extracellular factors triggering or supporting the conversion of stem cells to rapidly dividing precursors may be progressively altered with age. While further studies quantifying stem cell numbers in the aging human hippocampus will be invaluable to confirm this hypothesis, here we report data suggesting that declining neurogenesis with age may not be the result of stem cell depletion in the human hippocampus. Rather, our data are consistent with specific mechanistic changes at two independent stages of neurogenesis which influence proliferation and neuronal maturation. We also found that expression of DCX decreases significantly with age, consistent with previous studies of decreased DCX expression in the aged human subventricular zone (Weissleder et al., 2016). In our study in the hippocampus, the decline in DCX mRNA was accompanied by consistent expression of EOMES (Tbr2 in rodents), a transcription factor involved in neuronal fate decisions and expressed transiently in differentiating neurons in rodent studies (Hodge et al., 2012). These data suggest that neuronal progenitor cells, like quiescent stem cells, maintain a consistent population in which early neuronal specification is intact but where overall progenitor proliferation may be reduced. Reduced DCX expression, in conjunction with stable EOMES expression, suggests an unknown alteration in the hippocampal microenvironment specifically affecting the expression of genes influencing the successful maturation and migration of new neurons into the existing hippocampal circuitry. Alternatively, it may also indicate an uncontrolled exit from the immature neuronal state via early terminal differentiation or excessive cell death. Our data suggest that the early and intermediate phases of neurogenesis (represented by GFAPδ and EOMES) are unchanged, while the proliferation and early maturation stages are significantly reduced. We speculate that neurogenesis is altered in at least two distinct stages with age. The lack of any direct correlation between reduced cell proliferation and immature neuron markers supports the idea that the changes in neurogenesis at those stages may be the result of two separate physiological changes in the aging human brain. Neuroinflammation is one such factor which may differentially alter distinct stages of neurogenesis, being increasingly chronic in the aging hippocampus (Barrientos et al., 2015) and previously shown to modulate neurogenesis in in vivo rodent models (Ekdahl et al., 2003; Monje et al., 2003). While neuroinflammation is driven primarily by activated microglia, activated astrocytes have also recently been implicated in the regulation of the neuroinflammatory response (Jang et al., 2013). Experimentally, astrocyte activation is evidenced by increased GFAP mRNA (Nichols et al., 1993) and protein (David et al., 1997) in humans as well as morphological changes including hypertrophy and thickened radial processes (Rodríguez et al., 2014). Importantly, it has been suggested that the expression of GFAP influences the ability of new neurons to integrate into existing neural circuitry, with GFAP‐knockout mice reporting higher rates of neurogenesis in the hippocampus (Larsson et al., 2004; Widestrand et al., 2007). In our study, we found a significant increase in GFAP expression with age, consistent with previous studies. As GFAP is expressed in both astrocytes and stem cells, we also quantified the expression of the mature astrocyte marker S100B and found it to be unchanged with age, suggesting that the observed change is associated with increased astrocyte activation rather than astrogliogenesis. This is supported by our observation that astrocyte morphology in our aged cases is consistent with that reported for activated astrocytes (Fig. 2h). Partial correlation analysis showed that neither MKI67 (r(23) = −0.204; P = 0.327) nor DCX (r(23) = −0.342; P = 0.094) expression was associated with GFAP expression when controlling for age. This suggests that age‐related decreases in neurogenesis in the human hippocampus may not be a direct consequence of increased GFAP expression. In this study, we provide data supporting the hypothesis that the stem cell population of the human hippocampus may be maintained throughout adult life. We also found that mRNA markers of proliferation and of nascent neurons are concomitantly, but potentially independently, reduced with age. Our data suggest that human hippocampal neurogenesis is altered at specific developmental stages in the aging human brain. We suggest that these stages may thus be appropriate points for the development of treatments which aim to restore neurogenesis and thus potentially support cognitive function.

Author contributions

KM contributed to the conception and design of this study, experimental procedures, statistical analysis and writing of the manuscript. KA and DB contributed to the experimental procedures and editing of the manuscript. HB contributed to the statistical analysis and editing of the manuscript. CSW contributed to the conception and design of this study and editing of the manuscript. KD contributed to the conception and design of this study, statistical analysis and editing of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Discipline of Biomedical Science at the University of Sydney, the Schizophrenia Research Institute (utilizing infrastructure funding from the NSW Ministry of Health and the Macquarie Group Foundation), the University of New South Wales and Neuroscience Research Australia. CSW is a recipient of a National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) Principal Research Fellowship (PRF) (#1117079). Tissues were received from the New South Wales Brain Tissue Resource Centre at the University of Sydney supported by the Schizophrenia Research Institute and the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA).

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interest have been reported by any of the authors involved in the publication of this study. Table S1. Case demographics for qRT‐PCR and IF analysis. Table S2. TaqMan probes used in qRT‐PCR analysis. Click here for additional data file. Data S1. Experimental procedures. Click here for additional data file.
  34 in total

1.  Exercise enhances learning and hippocampal neurogenesis in aged mice.

Authors:  Henriette van Praag; Tiffany Shubert; Chunmei Zhao; Fred H Gage
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Increased proliferation reflects glial and vascular-associated changes, but not neurogenesis in the presenile Alzheimer hippocampus.

Authors:  Karin Boekhoorn; Marian Joels; Paul J Lucassen
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 5.996

3.  Complex and region-specific changes in astroglial markers in the aging brain.

Authors:  José J Rodríguez; Chia-Yu Yeh; Slavica Terzieva; Markel Olabarria; Magdalena Kulijewicz-Nawrot; Alexei Verkhratsky
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 4.673

4.  Increased cell proliferation and neurogenesis in the hippocampal dentate gyrus of old GFAP(-/-)Vim(-/-) mice.

Authors:  Asa Larsson; Ulrika Wilhelmsson; Marcela Pekna; Milos Pekny
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 5.  Functions and dysfunctions of adult hippocampal neurogenesis.

Authors:  Kimberly M Christian; Hongjun Song; Guo-li Ming
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 6.  Cognitive side effects of cancer therapy demonstrate a functional role for adult neurogenesis.

Authors:  Michelle Monje; Jörg Dietrich
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Neuroinflammation in the normal aging hippocampus.

Authors:  R M Barrientos; M M Kitt; L R Watkins; S F Maier
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Inflammation is detrimental for neurogenesis in adult brain.

Authors:  Christine T Ekdahl; Jan-Hendrik Claasen; Sara Bonde; Zaal Kokaia; Olle Lindvall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A transcriptional mechanism integrating inputs from extracellular signals to activate hippocampal stem cells.

Authors:  Jimena Andersen; Noelia Urbán; Angeliki Achimastou; Ayako Ito; Milesa Simic; Kristy Ullom; Ben Martynoga; Mélanie Lebel; Christian Göritz; Jonas Frisén; Masato Nakafuku; François Guillemot
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Decline in Proliferation and Immature Neuron Markers in the Human Subependymal Zone during Aging: Relationship to EGF- and FGF-Related Transcripts.

Authors:  Christin Weissleder; Samantha J Fung; Matthew W Wong; Guy Barry; Kay L Double; Glenda M Halliday; Maree J Webster; Cynthia Shannon Weickert
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 5.750

View more
  38 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of Central Nervous System Development by Class I Histone Deacetylases.

Authors:  Santosh R D'Mello
Journal:  Dev Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 2.  Age-dependent decline in neurogenesis of the hippocampus and extracellular nucleotides.

Authors:  Yoshinori Takei
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.174

3.  Co-treatment of vitamin D supplementation with enriched environment improves synaptic plasticity and spatial learning and memory in aged rats.

Authors:  Mahnaz Bayat; Kristi A Kohlmeier; Masoud Haghani; Afshin Borhani Haghighi; Azadeh Khalili; Gholamreza Bayat; Etrat Hooshmandi; Mohammad Shabani
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Human Adult Neurogenesis: Evidence and Remaining Questions.

Authors:  Gerd Kempermann; Fred H Gage; Ludwig Aigner; Hongjun Song; Maurice A Curtis; Sandrine Thuret; H Georg Kuhn; Sebastian Jessberger; Paul W Frankland; Heather A Cameron; Elizabeth Gould; Rene Hen; D Nora Abrous; Nicolas Toni; Alejandro F Schinder; Xinyu Zhao; Paul J Lucassen; Jonas Frisén
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 24.633

5.  Evidences for Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Humans.

Authors:  Elena P Moreno-Jiménez; Julia Terreros-Roncal; Miguel Flor-García; Alberto Rábano; María Llorens-Martín
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  A balanced evaluation of the evidence for adult neurogenesis in humans: implication for neuropsychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Alvaro Duque; Reynold Spector
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.270

Review 7.  Young at heart: Insights into hippocampal neurogenesis in the aged brain.

Authors:  Gregory W Kirschen; Shaoyu Ge
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Cypermethrin Impairs Hippocampal Neurogenesis and Cognitive Functions by Altering Neural Fate Decisions in the Rat Brain.

Authors:  Anuradha Yadav; Ankit Tandon; Brashket Seth; Shweta Goyal; Sangh Jyoti Singh; Shashi Kant Tiwari; Swati Agarwal; Saumya Nair; Rajnish Kumar Chaturvedi
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2020-09-13       Impact factor: 5.590

9.  Harnessing neurogenesis in the adult brain-A role in type 2 diabetes mellitus and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Orly Lazarov; Richard D Minshall; Marcelo G Bonini
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 3.230

Review 10.  Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis: A Coming-of-Age Story.

Authors:  H Georg Kuhn; Tomohisa Toda; Fred H Gage
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.