Literature DB >> 28766871

Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks.

L Lebert1,2, S-L Martz1,2, N Janecko1,2, A E Deckert1,2, A Agunos2, A Reid3, J E Rubin4, R J Reid-Smith1,2, S A McEwen1.   

Abstract

Surveillance is an important component of an overall strategy to address antimicrobial resistant bacteria in food animals and the food chain. The poultry market has many points of entry into the Canadian food chain, and some production practices are underrepresented in terms of surveillance. For example, pathogen carriage and antimicrobial resistance surveillance data are limited in smallholder chicken flocks raised for slaughter at provincially inspected abattoirs. In Canada, antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli and Salmonella isolated from commercial broiler chicken flocks, slaughtered at federally inspected abattoirs, is monitored by the Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (CIPARS). The objective of this study was to establish baseline information of antimicrobial resistance presence in E. coli and Salmonella isolated from smallholder flocks in Ontario, utilizing CIPARS collection and isolation methodologies, and to compare findings with CIPARS federally inspected abattoir data from Ontario, Canada. Five chickens per flock were sampled from 205 smallholder flocks. Of 1,025 samples, the E. coli prevalence was 99% (1,022/1,025), and 47% (483/1,022) of positive E. coli isolates were resistant to one or more of the 14 antimicrobials. Furthermore, as compared to results reported for the CIPARS commercial flocks, E. coli isolates from smallholder flocks had significantly lower resistance prevalence to six of 14 individual antimicrobials. Recovery of E. coli did not differ between federally inspected and provincially inspected flocks. Salmonella prevalence at the bird level in smallholder flocks was 0.3% (3/1,025), significantly lower (p ≪ 0.0001, 95% CI 0.080%-0.86%) than federally inspected commercial flocks. The overall differences found between the commercial and smallholder flocks may be explained by differences in poultry husbandry practices and hatchery sources.
© 2017 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada Zoonoses Public Health © 2017 Blackwell Verlag GmbH Reproduced with the permission of the Minister of OMAFRA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canadian Integrated System for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance; abattoir; chickens; smallholder flocks; surveillance; β-lactam

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28766871     DOI: 10.1111/zph.12381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health        ISSN: 1863-1959            Impact factor:   2.702


  4 in total

1.  A two-year prospective study of small poultry flocks in Ontario, Canada, part 2: causes of morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Nancy M Brochu; Michele T Guerin; Csaba Varga; Brandon N Lillie; Marina L Brash; Leonardo Susta
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 1.279

2.  A two-year prospective study of small poultry flocks in Ontario, Canada, part 1: prevalence of viral and bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  Nancy M Brochu; Michele T Guerin; Csaba Varga; Brandon N Lillie; Marina L Brash; Leonardo Susta
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 1.279

3.  Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella in poultry farms and in-contact humans in Adama and Modjo towns, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Betelhem Dagnew; Haile Alemayehu; Girmay Medhin; Tadesse Eguale
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica isolates: a two-year prospective study of small poultry flocks in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Csaba Varga; Michele T Guerin; Marina L Brash; Durda Slavic; Patrick Boerlin; Leonardo Susta
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 2.741

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.