| Literature DB >> 28766510 |
Nicolae Dan Tesloianu, Igor Nedelciuc, Vlad Ghizdovat, Maricel Agop1, Corina Lupascu-Ursulescu.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28766510 PMCID: PMC5731266 DOI: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.7825
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anatol J Cardiol ISSN: 2149-2263 Impact factor: 1.596
Figure 1(a–h) Acute thrombus formation in apparently healthy artery with no evidence of plaque dissection like as a responsible lesion — different interventional approach stages: patient 1 (a–d), patient 2 (e–f)
Average experimental parameters of blood flow through the right coronary artery for the two clinical cases
| Patient’s age (years) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52 | 4 | 70 | 9/75 mm Hg | 35±11 | 24±7 | 1060 | 3.04x10-6 at 36.5°C |
| 57 | 5 | 90 | 7/83 mm Hg | 35±11 | 24±7 | 1060 | 3.04x10-6 at 36.5°C |
| The method from [9] was used | The method from [9] was used | The method from [10] was used | The method from [10] was used | The method from [9] was used | |||
| 226 | 0.283 | 634 | 4.54 | ||||
| 283 | 0.226 | 457 | 5.52 | ||||
D - average experimental thrombus diameter; L - average experimental thrombus length; τ0 - average experimental deformation stress as a function of diastolic pressure; νd - average experimental diastolic velocity; νs - average experimental systolic velocity; ρ - average experimental blood density;η - average experimental kinetic viscosity coefficient; – Reynolds’ number; l - Darcy’s loss coefficient; Δ - pressure loss; - thrombus diameter determined using our model