Kristin Z Black1, La-Shell Johnson2,3, Carmen D Samuel-Hodge4, Lavanya Gupta5, Aditi Sundaresan6, Wanda K Nicholson7. 1. Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Campus Box #7440, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7440, USA. 2. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Old Clinic Building 3027, Campus Box #7570, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7570, USA. 3. Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Old Clinic Building 3027, Campus Box #7570, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7570, USA. 4. Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Campus Box #7426, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7426, USA. 5. Division of Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Control Branch, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, 100 Dickens Court #4, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA. 6. Patient-Centered Program on Women's Endocrine and Reproductive Health (PoWER), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1700 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Chapel Hill, NC, 27517, USA. 7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Center for Women's Health Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 3027 Old Clinic Building, Campus Box #7570, Chapel Hill, NC, 28599, USA. wknichol@med.unc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: African-American (AA) female cancer survivors share a disproportionate burden of diabetes compared to their white counterparts. Our objectives were to explore the perspectives of AA survivors with type 2 diabetes on perceived barriers to physical activity (PA) and preferences for a PA intervention and develop a framework for a PA program after cancer treatment. METHODS: Trained interviewers conducted semi-structured interviews with AA survivors of breast or endometrial cancer with diabetes (total n = 20; 16 breast, 4 endometrial). Thirteen open-ended questions were posed to stimulate discussions, which were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Two investigators independently reviewed transcriptions and extracted coded quotations to identify major themes. RESULTS: Median age of participants was 63 years. Nine themes were identified that focused on post-treatment physical symptoms (e.g., lymphedema, bone/joint pain, depression symptoms and self-motivation as barriers to PA, exercise routines tailored to physical limitations and peer partners and program leaders who understand their emotional health needs). The S.U.C.C.E.S.S. framework summarizes the survivors' preferences for an effective lifestyle intervention: Support efforts to maintain PA, Understand physical and depression symptoms, Collaborate with multi-disciplinary provider, Coordinate in-person intervention activities, Encourage partnerships among survivors for comorbidity risk reduction, develop Sustainable coping strategies for side effects of treatment, and Share local community resources. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors verbalized the need for a multi-disciplinary team to assist with their psychosocial needs and physical limitations to achieve their PA goals, as integrated into the S.U.C.C.E.S.S. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The S.U.C.C.E.S.S. framework reflects the perspectives of survivors with type 2 diabetes and may help to inform post-treatment programs.
PURPOSE: African-American (AA) female cancer survivors share a disproportionate burden of diabetes compared to their white counterparts. Our objectives were to explore the perspectives of AA survivors with type 2 diabetes on perceived barriers to physical activity (PA) and preferences for a PA intervention and develop a framework for a PA program after cancer treatment. METHODS: Trained interviewers conducted semi-structured interviews with AA survivors of breast or endometrial cancer with diabetes (total n = 20; 16 breast, 4 endometrial). Thirteen open-ended questions were posed to stimulate discussions, which were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Two investigators independently reviewed transcriptions and extracted coded quotations to identify major themes. RESULTS: Median age of participants was 63 years. Nine themes were identified that focused on post-treatment physical symptoms (e.g., lymphedema, bone/joint pain, depression symptoms and self-motivation as barriers to PA, exercise routines tailored to physical limitations and peer partners and program leaders who understand their emotional health needs). The S.U.C.C.E.S.S. framework summarizes the survivors' preferences for an effective lifestyle intervention: Support efforts to maintain PA, Understand physical and depression symptoms, Collaborate with multi-disciplinary provider, Coordinate in-person intervention activities, Encourage partnerships among survivors for comorbidity risk reduction, develop Sustainable coping strategies for side effects of treatment, and Share local community resources. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors verbalized the need for a multi-disciplinary team to assist with their psychosocial needs and physical limitations to achieve their PA goals, as integrated into the S.U.C.C.E.S.S. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The S.U.C.C.E.S.S. framework reflects the perspectives of survivors with type 2 diabetes and may help to inform post-treatment programs.
Entities:
Keywords:
African American women; Breast cancer; Cancer survivors; Endometrial cancer; Physical activity; Type 2 diabetes
Authors: Cheryl L Rock; Colleen Doyle; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Jeffrey Meyerhardt; Kerry S Courneya; Anna L Schwartz; Elisa V Bandera; Kathryn K Hamilton; Barbara Grant; Marji McCullough; Tim Byers; Ted Gansler Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Kristy K Ward; Nina R Shah; Cheryl C Saenz; Michael T McHale; Edwin A Alvarez; Steven C Plaxe Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2012-04-13 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Leslie H Clark; Emily M Ko; Amber Kernodle; Ariel Harris; Dominic T Moore; Paola A Gehrig; Victoria Bae-Jump Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Christine M Friedenreich; Kerry S Courneya; Sameer M Siddiqi; Anne McTiernan; Catherine M Alfano Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 13.506