Literature DB >> 28765996

Non-central peripherally inserted central catheters in neonatal intensive care: complication rates and longevity of catheters relative to tip position.

Bernard Goldwasser1, Catalina Baia2, Mimi Kim3, Benjamin H Taragin4,5, Robert M Angert6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) represent a mainstay of intravascular access in the neonatal intensive care setting when long-term vascular access is needed. Ideally, PICCs should be inserted and maintained in a central position with the tip ending in the superior or inferior vena cava. This is not always achievable, and sometimes the tip remains in a peripheral location. Higher complication rates have been reported with non-central PICCs; however these findings have not been confirmed in a solely neonatal series and PICCs with tips in peripheral veins have not been studied.
OBJECTIVE: To compare complication rates and length of catheter duration related to PICC position in neonates.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all PICCs inserted in term and preterm infants in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit between May 2007 and December 2009. A single pediatric radiologist reinterpreted the catheter tip site on initial anteroposterior (AP) chest radiographs and categorized sites as central (superior vena cava, inferior vena cava, brachiocephalic vein), intermediate (subclavian, axillary, common or external iliac veins), or peripheral (veins peripheral to axillary or external iliac veins). We analyzed complication rates and length of catheter duration among the three categories.
RESULTS: We collected data on a total of 176 PICCs. Infants with PICCs in a central location had a significantly lower complication rate (18/97, 19%) than those with the PICC tip in an intermediate (24/64, 38%) or peripheral (9/15, 60%) locations (P=0.0003). Length of catheter duration was noted to be longest with central, intermediate with intermediate, and shortest with peripheral PICC tip locations (17.7±14.8 days for central vs. 11.4±10.7 days for intermediate vs. 5.4±2.5 days for peripheral, P=0.0003).
CONCLUSION: A central location is ideal for the tip of a PICC. When this is not achievable, an intermediate location is preferable to a more peripheral position.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chest radiography; Intravascular access; Neonatal intensive care unit; Neonates; Peripherally inserted central catheter

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28765996     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-017-3939-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  11 in total

Review 1.  Neonatal vascular catheters and their complications.

Authors:  M J Hogan
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Fatal cardiac tamponade as a result of a peripherally inserted central venous catheter: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  R M L'E Orme; M M McSwiney; R F O Chamberlain-Webber
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Peripherally inserted central catheter complications in neonates with upper versus lower extremity insertion sites.

Authors:  Della Daugherty Wrightson
Journal:  Adv Neonatal Care       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.968

4.  Percutaneously inserted central catheter for total parenteral nutrition in neonates: complications rates related to upper versus lower extremity insertion.

Authors:  Viet Hoang; Jack Sills; Michelle Chandler; Erin Busalani; Robin Clifton-Koeppel; Houchang D Modanlou
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Association between Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter Insertion Site and Complication Rates in Preterm Infants.

Authors:  Rani A Bashir; Kamala Swarnam; Sakeer Vayalthrikkovil; Wendy Yee; Amuchou S Soraisham
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Peripherally inserted central catheter tip position and risk of associated complications in neonates.

Authors:  A Jain; P Deshpande; P Shah
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  Risk factors for peripherally inserted central venous catheter complications in children.

Authors:  Ketan Jumani; Sonali Advani; Nicholas G Reich; Leslie Gosey; Aaron M Milstone
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 16.193

8.  A case series of 72 neonates with renal vein thrombosis. Data from the 1-800-NO-CLOTS Registry.

Authors:  Stefan Kuhle; Patti Massicotte; Anthony Chan; Lesley Mitchell
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.249

9.  The safety and efficacy of midlines compared to peripherally inserted central catheters for adult cystic fibrosis patients: a retrospective, observational study.

Authors:  Rebecca Sharp; Adrian Esterman; Helen McCutcheon; Neville Hearse; Melita Cummings
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 5.837

10.  Unusual Presentation of Renal Vein Thrombosis in a Preterm Infant.

Authors:  Chang-Yo Yang; Ren-Huei Fu; Reyin Lien; Peng-Hong Yang
Journal:  Urol Case Rep       Date:  2014-03-22
View more
  3 in total

1.  [Effect of placement of peripherally inserted central catheter via the upper versus lower extremity veins: a Meta analysis].

Authors:  Xiu-Wen Chen; Le-Shan Zhou; Yan-Juan Tan; Yu-Shuang Chen; Zi-Rong Tao
Journal:  Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-12

2.  Machine Learning for Detection of Correct Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Tip Position from Radiology Reports in Infants.

Authors:  Manan Shah; Derek Shu; V B Surya Prasath; Yizhao Ni; Andrew H Schapiro; Kevin R Dufendach
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 2.762

3.  The correlation between weight gain and PICC tip shift in the very low birth weight infants.

Authors:  Meng Zhang; Wenyan Yang; Ling Yan; Lizhu Huang; Na Lin; Shiyi Zhang; Lilan He
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2020-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.