Hyun Gi Kim1, Won-Jin Moon2, JinJoo Han3, Jin Wook Choi4. 1. Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center, 164 World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 443-380, South Korea. 2. Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Hospital, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 4-12, Hwayang-dong, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, 143-914, South Korea. 3. Office of Biostatistics, Department of Humanities and Social Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164 World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 443-380, South Korea. 4. Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center, 164 World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 443-380, South Korea. radjwchoi@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of multiparametric quantitative MRI for myelination quantification in children. METHODS: We examined 22 children (age 0-14 years) with multiparametric quantitative MRI. The total volume of myelin partial volume (Msum), the percentage of Msum within the whole brain parenchyma (Mbpv), and the percentage of Msum within the intracranial volume (Micv) were obtained. Four developmental models of myelin maturation (the logarithmic, logistic, Gompertz, and modified Gompertz models) were examined to find the most representative model of the three parameters. We acquired myelin partial volume values in different brain regions and assessed the goodness of fit for the models. RESULTS: The ranges of Msum, Mbpv, and Micv were 0.8-160.9 ml, 0.2-13%, and 0.0-11.6%, respectively. The Gompertz model was the best fit for the three parameters. For developmental model analysis of myelin partial volume in each brain region, the Gompertz model was the best-fit model for pons (R 2 = 74.6%), middle cerebeller peduncle (R 2 = 76.4%), putamen (R2 = 95.8%), and centrum semiovale (R 2 = 77.7%). The logistic model was the best-fit model for the genu and splenium of the corpus callosum (R 2 = 79.7-93.6%), thalamus (R 2 = 81.7%), and frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital white matter (R 2 = 92.5-96.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Multiparametric quantitative MRI depicts the normal developmental pattern of myelination in children. It is a potential tool for research studies on pediatric brain development evaluation.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of multiparametric quantitative MRI for myelination quantification in children. METHODS: We examined 22 children (age 0-14 years) with multiparametric quantitative MRI. The total volume of myelin partial volume (Msum), the percentage of Msum within the whole brain parenchyma (Mbpv), and the percentage of Msum within the intracranial volume (Micv) were obtained. Four developmental models of myelin maturation (the logarithmic, logistic, Gompertz, and modified Gompertz models) were examined to find the most representative model of the three parameters. We acquired myelin partial volume values in different brain regions and assessed the goodness of fit for the models. RESULTS: The ranges of Msum, Mbpv, and Micv were 0.8-160.9 ml, 0.2-13%, and 0.0-11.6%, respectively. The Gompertz model was the best fit for the three parameters. For developmental model analysis of myelin partial volume in each brain region, the Gompertz model was the best-fit model for pons (R 2 = 74.6%), middle cerebeller peduncle (R 2 = 76.4%), putamen (R2 = 95.8%), and centrum semiovale (R 2 = 77.7%). The logistic model was the best-fit model for the genu and splenium of the corpus callosum (R 2 = 79.7-93.6%), thalamus (R 2 = 81.7%), and frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital white matter (R 2 = 92.5-96.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Multiparametric quantitative MRI depicts the normal developmental pattern of myelination in children. It is a potential tool for research studies on pediatric brain development evaluation.
Authors: M A van Buchem; S C Steens; H A Vrooman; A H Zwinderman; J C McGowan; M Rassek; V Engelbrecht Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: James J Levitt; Robert W McCarley; Chandlee C Dickey; Martina M Voglmaier; Margaret A Niznikiewicz; Larry J Seidman; Yoshio Hirayasu; Aleksandra A Ciszewski; Ron Kikinis; Ferenc A Jolesz; Martha E Shenton Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Aaron W Grossman; James D Churchill; Brandon C McKinney; Ian M Kodish; Stephani L Otte; William T Greenough Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Hollie West; James L Leach; Blaise V Jones; Marguerite Care; Rupa Radhakrishnan; Arnold C Merrow; Enrique Alvarado; Suraj D Serai Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2016-11-26 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: T Granberg; M Uppman; F Hashim; C Cananau; L E Nordin; S Shams; J Berglund; Y Forslin; P Aspelin; S Fredrikson; M Kristoffersen-Wiberg Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Sean C L Deoni; Douglas C Dean; Jonathan O'Muircheartaigh; Holly Dirks; Beth A Jerskey Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2012-08-02 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: T Vanderhasselt; M Naeyaert; N Watté; G-J Allemeersch; S Raeymaeckers; J Dudink; J de Mey; H Raeymaekers Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 3.825