Literature DB >> 28765750

Bioptome Perforation at Superior Vena Cava Anastomosis Site in Transplanted Heart.

In-Cheol Kim1, Jaewon Oh1, Chan-Joo Lee1, Jin-Young Kim2, Young-Nam Youn3, Seok-Min Kang1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28765750      PMCID: PMC5537160          DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2017.0015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean Circ J        ISSN: 1738-5520            Impact factor:   3.243


× No keyword cloud information.
A 42-year-old male successfully underwent orthotopic heart transplantation with a bicaval technique. During routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) before discharge, some resistance to passage of the bioptome (7Fr, Johnson and Johnson Medical, NV, USA) was noted. However, several attempts with gentle maneuvers helped the bioptome pass through the superior vena cava (SVC). On fluoroscopy, the bioptome (arrow) course was unusual and a right ventricular (RV) approach was not achieved. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed the bioptome to be in the pericardial space at the RV anterior side with newly developed pericardial effusion (Fig. 1A, asterisk: pericardial effusion, left ventricle [LV], RV). After removal of the bioptome, an agitated-saline bubble test was performed, but leakage into the pericardial space was not noted suggesting pressure equalization with the venous system (Fig 1B, Supplementary video 1 in the online-only Data Supplement). Cardiac computed tomography (CT) showed stricture of the SVC anastomosis site (Fig. 2A, arrow: pericardial effusion, dotted arrow: internal jugular venous sheath, SVC [R]: recipient part of SVC, SVC [D]: donor part of SVC). Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction further demonstrated invagination (Fig. 2B, C, indicators and abbreviations are same as Fig. 2A). The stricture and pouch-like invagination could have impeded bioptome advance, which penetrated to the pericardial space through the SVC anastomosis site. After the procedure, vital signs were stable and follow-up transthoracic echocardiography revealed no increase in pericardial effusion. The patient was discharged uneventfully 2 days later.
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Patients undergoing EMB are at risk of complications.1)2) The previously reported cardiac perforation incidence after EMB was 0.05–0.08%.1)3) Perforation through the SVC has been reported more rarely.4) With the help of 3D-CT, we visualized the exact SVC anastomosis site anatomy which was the perforation focus. Future EMB might be performed more safely with a bioptome approach through the medial side.
  4 in total

1.  Complications of endomyocardial biopsy in heart transplant patients: a retrospective study of 2117 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  F Saraiva; V Matos; L Gonçalves; M Antunes; L A Providência
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.066

2.  Endomyocardial biopsy technique for orthotopic heart transplantation and cardiac stem-cell harvesting.

Authors:  M Awad; A Ruzza; C Soliman; J Pinzás; E Marban; A Trento; L S C Czer
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  Complication rate of right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy via the femoral approach: a retrospective and prospective study analyzing 3048 diagnostic procedures over an 11-year period.

Authors:  Matthias Holzmann; Alexander Nicko; Uwe Kühl; Michel Noutsias; Wolfgang Poller; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Andreas Morguet; Bernhard Witzenbichler; Carsten Tschöpe; Heinz-Peter Schultheiss; Matthias Pauschinger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Early Parasympathetic Reinnervation Is Not Related to Reconnection of Major Branches of the Vagus Nerve after Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  So-Ryoung Lee; Do-Yoon Kang; Youngjin Cho; Hyun-Jai Cho; Hae-Young Lee; Eue-Keun Choi; Seil Oh
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.243

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Understanding the Current Status of Korean Heart Transplantation Based on Initial KOTRY Report.

Authors:  In Cheol Kim; Jong Chan Youn
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.243

Review 2.  The Past, Present and Future of Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  In Cheol Kim; Jong Chan Youn; Jon A Kobashigawa
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.243

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.