Literature DB >> 28765718

Checklist of bees (Apoidea) from a private conservation property in west-central Montana.

Marirose Kuhlman1, Skyler Burrows2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Here we present preliminary results from the first three years of a long-term bee survey conducted at a 3,840-ha private conservation property in the northern Sapphire Mountains and Bitterroot River Valley, and a pilot study at an associated 80-ha property in the Swan River Valley, Missoula County, Montana, USA. The survey includes hand-net, bowl-trap, and blue-vane trap collections. The resulting checklist comprises 229 bee species and morphospecies within 5 families, 38 genera and 91 subgenera. Of the total species in the list, 34 of them represent first state records Montana. This survey expands the number of bee species recorded in Montana to 366. Included in these species is Megachile (Eutricharaea) apicalis Spinola, showing a range expansion for this introduced bee. NEW INFORMATION: We present new distributional records for 34 bee species, including Megachile (Eutricharaea) apicalis Spinola, an introduced bee that was discovered to be resident in North America in 1984 in Santa Barbara County, California. This species has since expanded its range in the across the west, but had not been previously recorded in Montana.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hymenoptera ; Intermountain West; Megachile apicalis; North America; adventive; biodiversity; introduced; invasive species; native species; pollinator; range expansion

Year:  2017        PMID: 28765718      PMCID: PMC5515105          DOI: 10.3897/BDJ.5.e11506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biodivers Data J        ISSN: 1314-2828


Introduction

Wild bees play a vital role as pollinators in both agricultural and natural systems, and may be important to the success of habitat restoration projects (Menz et al. 2011, Williams 2011). Work has been done to document bee faunas of some western regions of North America, including Colorado (Scott et al. 2011), the Columbia Basin (Tepedino and Griswold 1995), north-central Washington (Wilson et al. 2010), and some US national parks and monuments (e.g. Messinger and Griswold 2002); but there are few large-scale bee surveys from Montana. Reported here is the bee species list from the first three years of a long-term bee monitoring study we initiated in 2013 at MPG Ranch, a privately-owned conservation property in the northern Bitterroot Valley and Sapphire Mountains, and a pilot study from MPG North, an associated property in the Swan Valley. Both properties are in Missoula County of west-central Montana. A purpose of this study is to inventory the bee fauna on the properties.

Materials and methods

Study Site

The 3,840 hectare MPG Ranch is a privately-owned conservation property in west-central Montana, in the Bitterroot River Valley and Sapphire Mountains of Missoula County (Fig. 1). Elevations range from 975m at the valley floor along the Bitterroot River, to 1860m on Mount Baldy, its highest point. The region has a mild, semi-arid climate with cool, moist winters and warm, dry summers. Mean precipitation ranges from 300mm at the valley floor to 350mm on mountain summits; most precipitation occurs in the winter as snow. Mean temperatures for the nearby town of Stevensville range from -3.6°C in December to 20.0°C in July.
Figure 1.

Map of Montana and surrounding states with Missoula County boundary and property locations marked.

For over a century prior to 2009, this property had been managed for livestock and agricultural crop production. During that time, most of the lower elevation grasslands were replaced with irrigated crops or introduced forage grasses. These areas are now out of production and undergoing restoration treatments to return them to a more natural state. Livestock has also been removed from the property as part of the restoration effort, and native ungulates (elk, mule deer, and whitetail deer) currently comprise the majority of vertebrate grazers. Habitats on the property include riparian bottomlands, dry open forests, mid-elevation sagebrush steppe and grasslands, montane grasslands, and montane mixed-conifer forest. The MPG North, an associated 81 hectare conservation property separated from MPG Ranch by over 100 kilometers, is located in the Swan River Valley, also in Missoula County (Fig. 1), at an elevation of 1200m. The climate in the Swan River Valley is cooler and wetter than the Bitterroot River Valley. At the nearby town of Seeley Lake, mean temperatures range from -6.1°C in December to 17.5°C in July, and mean annual preciptiation is 530mm. MPG North's habitat consists of mixed-conifer forest and clearings, and some small wetlands.

Collection Methods

We captured bees from MPG Ranch using the protocol outlined in A Standardized Method for Monitoring Bee Populations: The Bee Inventory (BI) Plot (LeBuhn et al. 2003), modified by reducing the amount of time spent netting from 60 minutes to 30 minutes. We used 24 plots that had been chosen for a larger, multi-organism surveying effort occurring on the property. These 24 sampling plots were placed along an elevational gradient, from approximately 975m elevation to 1850m elevation. At each location we laid out two 50m transects, intersecting at 25m, creating an "X". We deployed 21, 3.25oz Solo brand plastic cups (Solo brand stock number PB6-0099) filled with soapy water at each sampling plot and placed them about 5m apart along the transects. Bowls were spray-painted fluorescent blue, fluorescent yellow, or left white. Seven bowls of each of the three colors were used at each site. With the exception of the first sampling round, we placed traps out at all sampling plots on the same day by 9am and collected the contents after 3pm, providing a snapshot of the bee species composition for that day. We seived bowl-trapped bees in the field and transferred them into 4oz Whirl-Pak bags with 70% isopropanol. We kept these samples refrigerated until shipment to the USDA-ARS Pollinating Insects Research Unit in Logan, UT, for identification. A total of 30 minutes of netting occurred at each site on each collection day in 2013 and 2015, when time and field staff availability permitted. Netting took place on bowl-trapping days or the following day, and was limited to a 100m radius of plot center. Samplers netted bees throughout the plot and attempted to sample from as many different floral resources as possible within the time frame. Netted bees were dispatched with ethyl acetate and kept frozen in labeled collection tubes until processed. We sampled every 2-4 weeks throughout as much of the field season as possible to capture as much of the bee fauna as we could. We sampled each of the plots five times in 2013 (June 10-17, July 1, July 22, August 12, and September 9), seven times in 2014 (May 1, May 15, June 12, July 10, July 31, August 28, and September 17), and nine times in 2015 (April 21, May 4, May 18, June 8, June 29, July 20, August 10, September 1, and September 23). Collecting events at MPG North were part of a pilot study and consisted of a small number of blue vane trap collections and some hand-netting in 2014 and 2015. Bee species caught at MPG North are included in this species checklist. Species accumulation estimates were determined by using EstimateS (Colwell 2013).

Species Identification

Bees were identified by Skyler Burrows with help from Harold Ikerd, Zachary Portman, Michael Orr, and Terry Griswold. Family, genus, and subgenus classifications follow Michener 2007 except in the some of the subgenera (which follow Gibbs et al. 2012). Species determinations were made using the following taxonomic keys: (Snelling 1966a, Snelling 1966b, Snelling 1970, Stephen 1954), (Bouseman and LaBerge 1978, LaBerge and Bouseman 1970, LaBerge 1969, LaBerge 1973, LaBerge and Ribble 1975, LaBerge 1977, LaBerge 1980, LaBerge 1985, LaBerge 1986, LaBerge 1989, Ribble 1967, Ribble 1974, Thorp 1969, Timberlake 1956, Timberlake 1960) (Dumesh and Sheffield 2012, McGinley 1986, McGinley 2003, Roberts 1972, Roberts 1973), (Baker 1975, Gonzalez and Griswold 2013, Grigarick and Stange 1968, Hurd and Michener 1955, Michener 1938a, Michener 1938b, Michener 1939, Hurd 1958, Michener 1947, Sandhouse 1939, Sheffield et al. 2011), (Brumley 1965, Daly 1973, Koch et al. 2012, Hurd and Linsley 1951, LaBerge 1956a, LaBerge 1956b, LaBerge 1961, Laberge 1963, Rightmyer 2008, Sipes 2001, Thorp and Horning 1983, Timberlake 1969). In addition, reference specimens from the U.S. National Pollinating Insect Collection were used for species verification and identification. Bees that could be morphologically distinguished from each other but lacked taxonomic literature to determine species level were separated into morphospecies and given alphanumeric titles. When male and female morphospecies could not be associated, male morphospecies were given letters (e.g sp. A) and female morphospecies were given numbers (eg. sp. 01). We only included the gender with the larger number of morphospecies in our species counts to avoid falsely inflating the number of species. Bee specimens were pinned and labeled with location information, date, collection method, and collector name. Except for two synoptic sets of voucher specimens that are kept at MPG Ranch, specimens are deposited in the U.S. National Pollinating Insect Collection at Logan, Utah. bees in the subgenus were identified only to subgenus due to the difficulty in distinguishing between species and the lack of comprehensive keys for the western United States. Species in the genus were also only identified to genus level due to the lack of available taxonomic literature for the area.

Range

Species ranges were determined using Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), DiscoverLife.org (Ascher and Pickering 2016), and U.S. National Pollinating Insects databases in order to determine how many species records were new to the state of Montana.

Checklists

Checklist

Cresson 1868 Cockerell 1906 Swenk 1904 Cockerell 1898 (Linnaeus 1758) (Metz 1911) (Cockerell 1896) (Cockerell 1896) (Cockerell 1896) (Cockerell 1896) Graenicher 1903 LaBerge 1980

Notes

New species record for Montana Graenicher 1903 Viereck 1904 Linsley & MacSwain 1961 New species record for Montana Viereck & Cockerell 1914 Viereck & Cockerell 1914 (Ashmead 1890) Cockerell 1897 Robertson 1891 (Kirby 1802) Smith 1853 Viereck 1904 Smith 1853 Viereck 1904 New species record for Montana Robertson 1891 Cockerell 1898 New species record for Montana Cockerell 1922 Viereck 1904 New species record for Montana Lanham 1987 Robertson 1893 Cockerell 1896 Cockerell 1901 Viereck 1904 Viereck 1924 New species record for Montana Viereck 1904 (Viereck 1904) Smith 1879 Cockerell 1902 Viereck 1904 (Viereck 1904) Cockerell 1901 Robertson 1891 Smith 1879 Cockerell 1897 Smith 1879 (Rozen 1958) New species record for Montana (Cresson 1878) Cockerell 1896 Crawford 1915 New species record for Montana Timberlake 1956 (Cockerell 1908) New species record for Montana (Provancher 1888) New species record for Montana Cresson 1872 (Fabricius 1775) (Cockerell 1925) (Cresson 1878) Bohart 1948 Smith 1853 Say 1837 (Christ 1791) Smith 1853 Cockerell 1895 (Crawford 1907) (Cockerell 1916) (Cockerell 1898) New species record for Montana (Cockerell 1898) New species record for Montana (Crawford 1907) New species record for Montana McGinley 1986 (Sandhouse 1933) (Vachal 1904) McGinley 1986 (Cockerell 1895) (Cresson 1874) (Smith 1848) (Crawford 1906) (Cresson 1872) Cresson 1868 Cresson 1878 Swenk 1914 (Say 1837) (Cockerell 1897) (Ashmead 1897) New species record for Montana (Cresson 1879) New species record for Montana (Michener 1936) Crawford 1916 New species record for Montana Crawford 1914 Cresson 1864 Say 1824 Smith 1854 Smith 1854 Cresson 1872 New species record for Montana Cockerell 1900 (Smith 1854) (Cresson 1879) Swenk 1914 (Cresson 1878) Cockerell 1910 New species record for Montana Cresson 1864 (Cresson 1872) Cockerell 1910 New species record for Montana (Cresson 1864) (Cresson 1864) Titus 1904 New species record for Montana (Cockerell 1906) (Kirby 1837) (Cresson 1864) Smith 1853 Cockerell 1902 New species record for Montana Spinola 1808 New species record for Montana (Fabricius 1793) Say 1837 Cockerell 1915 New species record for Montana Cockerell 1900 Cockerell 1905 Thomson 1872 Cresson 1878 Cresson 1878 Mitchell 1934 Cresson 1878 Say 1837 Smith 1853 Cockerell 1898 Cresson 1878 Cresson 1864 Cresson 1864 Cresson 1878 Cresson 1864 Cresson 1878 Cockerell 1906 Cockerell 1897 Michener 1936 New species record for Montana Cresson 1864 Cockerell 1897 Cockerell 1897 Cockerell 1906 Cresson 1864 Cockerell 1907 Cresson 1864 Cockerell 1897 New species record for Montana Cockerell 1916 New species record for Montana Sandhouse 1924 Cresson 1864 Cresson 1864 Cockerell 1897 Cockerell 1897 Sandhouse 1924 Cresson 1864 Timberlake 1941 (Cockerell 1925) Cresson 1864 Cresson 1864 Cresson 1869 Cresson 1878 New species record for Montana Cockerell 1900 Cresson 1869 Kirby 1838 Cresson 1869 Cresson 1878 Cresson 1869 New species record for Montana Linnaeus 1758 Cresson 1874 Greene 1858 Cresson 1863 Smith 1854 (Fabricius 1798) (Franklin 1911) (Smith 1861) Cresson 1878 Cresson 1864 Cresson 1863 Greene 1860 Cresson 1878 Smith 1854 Cresson 1878 Provancher 1895 New species record for Montana Cockerell 1897 Cockerell 1901 (Cresson 1878) (Cresson 1878) Cresson 1878 (Robertson 1902) New species record for Montana (Cresson 1878) (Provancher 1888) (Cresson 1878) (Timberlake 1969) New species record for Montana (Smith 1879) Cresson 1878 Cresson 1879 Cresson 1875 New species record for Montana Tucker 1909 Cresson 1878 Cresson 1878 Cockerell 1905 Cresson 1872 (Cresson 1873) New species record for Montana Cresson 1878 (Cockerell & Sandhouse 1924) New species record for Montana Robertson 1903 (Viereck 1905) (Cresson 1878)

Analysis

Between 2013 and 2015 we collected a total of 64,747 bees representing 229 species and morphospecies across 38 genera in 5 bee families (Suppl. material 1). We had a total of 558 collection events (unique combinations of site and collection date). The number of species we collected is near the number of species we would expect to find in our study area based on species accumulation estimates, which predict the number of bee species in the area to be 255 (Fig. 2). Net collections yielded a total of 110 species, only three of which were species not also collected by pantraps. This number is lower than would be expected based on previous studies showing from 23% and 53% of the bee species collected by net to be unique when compared to pantraps (Grundel et al. 2011, Roulston et al. 2007, Wilson et al. 2008). This may be due to the reduced net collection time period (30 minutes instead of 60 minutes). In addition, many of the net collectors had no prior experience with insect collecting. Increased collection periods and improved collector training could raise the number of unique net collected species.
Figure 2.

Species accumulation curve generated for bee species sampled in 558 collection events between 2013 and 2015. Species estimates were generated using EstimateS. The blue line represents the mean species accumulation, and the light blue shaded area represents the upper and lower bound of 95% confidence interval for species estimate.

Discussion

Prior to our investigation, the number of known wild bee species in Montana was 337. Our study increases this number to a total of 366. This result may not be unexpected since Montana is largely rural and there have been few large scale bee inventories in the state. Fewer than 1200 collected bee specimens have been reported each year in Montana prior to 2013 (GBIF 2016, U. S. National Pollinating Insects Database 2016). Our species list is relevant to other areas within the Montana Valley and Foothill Prairies Ecoregion (Taylor 2012), but may not reflect bee species present in other ecoregions in Montana, especially the Northwestern Great Plains and Northwestern Glaciated Plains Ecoregions. Investigations in the sparsely populated central and eastern portions of Montana may yield more species to a state bee species checklist.

is an Old World species in the subgenus . Although there are North American records for prior to 1932, no established populations were recorded until 1984, when resident populations were documented in Santa Barbara County, CA (Cooper 1984). Subsquent collections showed that the species had expanded its range to Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia, Canada, along with its most common floral host, (Barthell et al. 2001, McIver et al. 2009, Sheffield et al. 2011), a widespread, introduced weed that invades rangelands in the western United States. There is evidence for a positive link between the spread of non-native weeds and the presence of non-native bees (Hanley and Goulson 2003). has a strong association with and some researchers have suggested that these two Old World species, along with , form an invasive mutualism (Barthell et al. 2001, McIver et al. 2009), in which each of the three species within the mutualism benefits from the presence of, and encourages the spread of the other species within the mutualism. Our collections are the first documentation of in Montana, indicating further range expansion of this adventive bee. , a close relative of , is a problematic weed species throughout MPG Ranch and Montana. captures increase in late summer/early autumn, when bloom intensity peaks (MPG Ranch unpublished data), suggesting that may be preferentially using this species in our area. Additionally, appears to be integrated throughout the MPG Ranch, since we have found at most of our sampling locations. MPG species with male and female counts Data type: Occurence Brief description: MPG species list with number of males and females of each species collected from 2013-2015. File: oo_125429.xlsx
  2 in total

1.  Reconnecting plants and pollinators: challenges in the restoration of pollination mutualisms.

Authors:  Myles H M Menz; Ryan D Phillips; Rachael Winfree; Claire Kremen; Marcelo A Aizen; Steven D Johnson; Kingsley W Dixon
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 18.313

2.  Revision and reclassification of Lasioglossum (Evylaeus), L. (Hemihalictus) and L. (Sphecodogastra) in eastern North America (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Halictidae).

Authors:  Jason Gibbs; Laurence Packer; Sheila Dumesh; Bryan N Danforth
Journal:  Zootaxa       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.091

  2 in total
  3 in total

1.  A list of bees from three locations in the Northern Rockies Ecoregion (NRE) of western Montana.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Reese; Laura A Burkle; Casey M Delphia; Terry Griswold
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2018-10-30

2.  Checklist of bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) from small diversified vegetable farms in south-western Montana.

Authors:  Casey M Delphia; Terry Griswold; Elizabeth G Reese; Kevin M O'Neill; Laura A Burkle
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2019-01-28

3.  Decades of native bee biodiversity surveys at Pinnacles National Park highlight the importance of monitoring natural areas over time.

Authors:  Joan M Meiners; Terry L Griswold; Olivia Messinger Carril
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.