Literature DB >> 28765439

Will a Short Training Session Improve Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Quality by Dental School Faculty? A Pilot Study.

Mark A Dellinges1, Donald A Curtis2.   

Abstract

Faculty members are expected to write high-quality multiple-choice questions (MCQs) in order to accurately assess dental students' achievement. However, most dental school faculty members are not trained to write MCQs. Extensive faculty development programs have been used to help educators write better test items. The aim of this pilot study was to determine if a short workshop would result in improved MCQ item-writing by dental school faculty at one U.S. dental school. A total of 24 dental school faculty members who had previously written MCQs were randomized into a no-intervention group and an intervention group in 2015. Six previously written MCQs were randomly selected from each of the faculty members and given an item quality score. The intervention group participated in a training session of one-hour duration that focused on reviewing standard item-writing guidelines to improve in-house MCQs. The no-intervention group did not receive any training but did receive encouragement and an explanation of why good MCQ writing was important. The faculty members were then asked to revise their previously written questions, and these were given an item quality score. The item quality scores for each faculty member were averaged, and the difference from pre-training to post-training scores was evaluated. The results showed a significant difference between pre-training and post-training MCQ difference scores for the intervention group (p=0.04). This pilot study provides evidence that the training session of short duration was effective in improving the quality of in-house MCQs.

Keywords:  assessment; dental education; dental faculty; faculty development; item-writing flaws; multiple-choice questions

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28765439     DOI: 10.21815/JDE.017.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Educ        ISSN: 0022-0337            Impact factor:   2.264


  7 in total

1.  Effect of Faculty Training on Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions.

Authors:  Piyush Gupta; Pinky Meena; Amir Maroof Khan; Rajeev Kumar Malhotra; Tejinder Singh
Journal:  Int J Appl Basic Med Res       Date:  2020-07-11

2.  Evaluating the Quality of Multiple Choice Question in Paediatric Dentistry Postgraduate Examinations.

Authors:  Mawlood Kowash; Iyad Hussein; Manal Al Halabi
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2019-09-08

3.  The interrelationship between confidence and correctness in a multiple-choice assessment: pointing out misconceptions and assuring valuable questions.

Authors:  Renata Grazziotin-Soares; Coca Blue; Rachel Feraro; Kristen Tochor; Thiago Machado Ardenghi; Donald Curtis; Diego Machado Ardenghi
Journal:  BDJ Open       Date:  2021-02-12

4.  Quality of multiple-choice questions in medical internship qualification examination determined by item response theory at Debre Tabor University, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Lalem Menber Belay; Tegbar Yigzaw Sendekie; Fantu Abebe Eyowas
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 3.263

5.  Knowledge of dental faculty in gulf cooperation council states of multiple-choice questions' item writing flaws.

Authors:  Mawlood Kowash; Hazza Alhobeira; Iyad Hussein; Manal Al Halabi; Saif Khan
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2020-12

6.  Evaluation of an Intervention to Improve Quality of Single-best Answer Multiple-choice Questions.

Authors:  Kevin R Scott; Andrew M King; Molly K Estes; Lauren W Conlon; Jonathan S Jones; Andrew W Phillips
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-12-03

7.  Evaluation of One-Day Multiple-Choice Question Workshop for Anesthesiology Faculty Members.

Authors:  Parissa Sezari; Ardeshir Tajbakhsh; Nilofar Massoudi; Ali Arhami Dolatabadi; Soodeh Tabashi; Shahram Sayyadi; Maryam Vosoughian; Ali Dabbagh
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2020-12-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.