Literature DB >> 28765256

Engaging Stakeholders and Promoting Uptake of OMERACT Core Outcome Instrument Sets.

Sean R Tunis1,2,3, Lara J Maxwell4,5,6, Ian D Graham1,2,3, Beverley J Shea1,2,3, Dorcas E Beaton1,2,3, Clifton O Bingham1,2,3, Peter Brooks1,2,3, Philip G Conaghan1,2,3, Maria Antonietta D'Agostino1,2,3, Maarten P de Wit1,2,3, Laure Gossec1,2,3, Lyn M March1,2,3, Lee S Simon1,2,3, Jasvinder A Singh1,2,3, Vibeke Strand1,2,3, George A Wells1,2,3, Peter Tugwell1,2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: While there has been substantial progress in the development of core outcomes sets, the degree to which these are used by researchers is variable. We convened a special workshop on knowledge translation at the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) 2016 with 2 main goals. The first focused on the development of a formal knowledge translation framework and the second on promoting uptake of recommended core outcome domain and instrument sets.
METHODS: We invited all 189 OMERACT 2016 attendees to the workshop; 86 attended, representing patient research partners (n = 15), healthcare providers/clinician researchers (n = 52), industry (n = 4), regulatory agencies (n = 4), and OMERACT fellows (n = 11). Participants were given an introduction to knowledge translation and were asked to propose and discuss recommendations for the OMERACT community to (1) strengthen stakeholder involvement in the core outcome instrument set development process, and (2) promote uptake of core outcome sets with a specific focus on the potential role of post-regulatory decision makers.
RESULTS: We developed the novel "OMERACT integrated knowledge translation" framework, which formalizes OMERACT's knowledge translation strategies. We produced strategies to improve stakeholder engagement throughout the process of core outcome set development and created a list of creative and innovative ways to promote the uptake of OMERACT's core outcome sets.
CONCLUSION: The guidance provided in this paper is preliminary and is based on the views of the participants. Future work will engage OMERACT groups, "post-regulatory decision makers," and a broad range of different stakeholders to identify and evaluate the most useful methods and processes, and to revise guidance accordingly.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ARTHRITIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RHEUMATOLOGY; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28765256     DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.161273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  7 in total

1.  Implementing core outcomes in kidney disease: report of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology (SONG) implementation workshop.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Braden Manns; Angela Yee Moon Wang; Brenda Hemmelgarn; David C Wheeler; John Gill; Peter Tugwell; Robert Pecoits-Filho; Sally Crowe; Tess Harris; Wim Van Biesen; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Adeera Levin; Aliza Thompson; Vlado Perkovic; Angela Ju; Talia Gutman; Amelie Bernier-Jean; Andrea K Viecelli; Emma O'Lone; Jenny Shen; Michelle A Josephson; Yeoungjee Cho; David W Johnson; Bénédicte Sautenet; Marcello Tonelli; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 10.612

2.  Clinicians' and researchers' perspectives on establishing and implementing core outcomes in haemodialysis: semistructured interview study.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Sally Crowe; John S Gill; Tess Harris; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Braden Manns; Roberto Pecoits-Filho; Peter Tugwell; Wim van Biesen; Angela Yee Moon Wang; David C Wheeler; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Talia Gutman; Angela Ju; Emma O'Lone; Benedicte Sautenet; Andrea Viecelli; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement.

Authors:  Jamie J Kirkham; Sarah Gorst; Douglas G Altman; Jane M Blazeby; Mike Clarke; Sean Tunis; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 4.  Practical guidance for engaging patients in health research, treatment guidelines and regulatory processes: results of an expert group meeting organized by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO).

Authors:  Maarten de Wit; Cyrus Cooper; Peter Tugwell; Nathalie Bere; John Kirwan; Philip G Conaghan; Charlotte Roberts; Isabelle Aujoulat; Nasser Al-Daghri; Islene Araujo de Carvalho; Mary Barker; Nicola Bedlington; Maria Luisa Brandi; Olivier Bruyère; Nansa Burlet; Philippe Halbout; Mickaël Hiligsmann; Famida Jiwa; John A Kanis; Andrea Laslop; Wendy Lawrence; Daniel Pinto; Concepción Prieto Yerro; Véronique Rabenda; René Rizzoli; Marieke Scholte-Voshaar; Mila Vlaskovska; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  A survey of knowledge, perceptions and use of core outcome sets among clinical trialists.

Authors:  Chiara Bellucci; Karen Hughes; Elaine Toomey; Paula R Williamson; Karen Matvienko-Sikar
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-12-19       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Radiation therapy for melanoma brain metastases: a systematic review.

Authors:  John F Thompson; Gabrielle J Williams; Angela M Hong
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2022-08-14       Impact factor: 4.214

7.  Community first response and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Identifying priorities for data collection, analysis, and use via the nominal group technique.

Authors:  Eithne Heffernan; Dylan Keegan; Jenny Mc Sharry; Tomás Barry; Peter Tugwell; Andrew W Murphy; Conor Deasy; David Menzies; Cathal O'Donnell; Siobhan Masterson
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2022-01-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.